Should the billing process be part of ISO 9001:2008?

Should the billing/invoicing process be explicitly part of ISO 9001:2008?

  • Yes. Billing/invoicing processes should be explicitly part of the new ISO 9001

    Votes: 24 55.8%
  • No. Billing/invoicing processes should not be part of the new ISO 9001

    Votes: 19 44.2%

  • Total voters
    43

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Staff member
Admin
#1
We all know that, for the most part, ISO 9001 is used in the Business World where goods are exchanged for money. We also know that ISO 9001 focus on customer satisfaction and one of the most common sources for customer dissatisfaction is incorrect billing.
So, shouldn't the ISO 9001 standard have more explicit requirements concerning the billing/invoicing process as it affects customer satisfaction?
Most QMS that I have assessed do not include the billing/invoicing processes. Even though it is a process that, without a question, is critical to both the supplier and the customer.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

harry

Super Moderator
#2
Some companies have complicated accounting practices - various types of billing, invoicing, discounts and what nots including transactions which we do not like to know of (some of which are customer request). On top of that, yearly submission of audited accounts in my country is a legal requirement.

Therefore, over here we normally advise our clients to leave billing and invoicing (accounting) out of the system and let the other 'auditor' crack his head.

Otherwise, it is certaintly a good suggestion Sidney - for it can go a long way to improve customer satisfaction.
 
G

Greg B

#3
I am in Logistics (one of many hats) and as such I'm part of our customer service group. We do fall under the scope of our QMS and detail all of our processes up to and including documentation to customers/customs/shipping lines etc including invoicing and bills of lading etc but the final money handling transaction aspects of these processes are covered under our financial accounting systems which are audited separately to our QMS. It is a federal legislative requirement that it be audited independently so we do not see the benefit of having it audited twice.
 

Howard Atkins

Forum Administrator
Staff member
Admin
#4
There are two aspects of the auditing requirement for the financial side of the company.
The first which is the requirement of the country to audit the actual financial records which is based on the need to ensure that the government gets all its taxes.
The reason that I believe that the billing process should be part of the QMS as it is a vital part of customer satisfaction.
The requirements of the financial community and the requirements of the QMS are different, one emphasis the accuracy and the other the manner and the method.
The other advantage is that it will connect all aspects of the company together.

As you can guess I voted YES
 
C

Clausterphobic

#5
different standards being merged?

Greg B said:
It is a federal legislative requirement that it be audited independently so we do not see the benefit of having it audited twice.
I can see that there's a tendency for the ISO merging different standards although I must admit that billing is a part of the business process. But as GregB said, I don't see the benefit of being audited twice.:nope:

:topic: what would this mean? ISO auditors should also be adept with accounting(billing) procedures? I should be studying right now!:read:

Obviously I voted no.
 
#6
Sidney Vianna said:
So, shouldn't the ISO 9001 standard have more explicit requirements concerning the billing/invoicing process as it affects customer satisfaction?
I do agree that this is an important aspect of the customer supplier relationship, but I'm not so sure about adding requirements. There is nothing to prevent us from including it in our systems as it is (7.2).

Lets discuss what those new requirements should look like, should they be added. (I have not voted yet).

/Claes
 

Howard Atkins

Forum Administrator
Staff member
Admin
#7
In my opinion it is not auditing twice, rather different aspects.
I believe that the financial audits are involved with the accuracy of the calculations and the method of calculating various aspects of the actual allowed exceptions.
There is no audit from a customer, internal and external viewpoint.
Financial institutions are ISO9001 registered and audited as suppliers of services by the registrars and audited by the various bodies for financial aspects.
These services are by all definitions Customer Orientated Processes and to exclude them is incorrect
 

Coury Ferguson

Moderator here to help
Staff member
Super Moderator
#8
Sidney Vianna said:
We all know that, for the most part, ISO 9001 is used in the Business World where goods are exchanged for money. We also know that ISO 9001 focus on customer satisfaction and one of the most common sources for customer dissatisfaction is incorrect billing.
So, shouldn't the ISO 9001 standard have more explicit requirements concerning the billing/invoicing process as it affects customer satisfaction?
Most QMS that I have assessed do not include the billing/invoicing processes. Even though it is a process that, without a question, is critical to both the supplier and the customer.

The billing process should not be part of the ISO requirements, in my opinion. Any complaints would be handled through the Customer Satisfaction requirement.
 
Last edited:

RoxaneB

Super Moderator
Super Moderator
#9
As Howard so aptly phrased it, billing/invoicing is a Customer-orientated process. If the "taking" of Customer requirements is worthy of 'shall' statements, why not the other end of the process? In essence, this would be completing the loop as it pertains to relations with the Customer.

The auditing of billing/invoicing would focus on conformance to the requirements as opposed to compliance to financial regulations. For those of us who fall under the Sarbanes-Oxley umbrella, I'm curious to know how ISO 9001 companies are integrating the financial processes into their BMS (if at all).

I look at the financial audit process as being two-fold, comparable to EMS audits. One is a compliance audit the regulations, rules and statutes. One is a conformance audit to the requirements of the management system.

I am curious, however, to see how it would fit into the existing standard...
 

RoxaneB

Super Moderator
Super Moderator
#10
Coury Ferguson said:
The billing process should not be part of the ISO requirements, in my opion. Any complaints would be handled through the Customer Satisfaction requirement.

Coury Ferguson
But shouldn't a company be striving to not have complaints...especially in something as simple as paperwork? The fact that complaints are occuring in this area (for some companies it's the bulk of their errors) should give us reason to pause and consider that perhaps controls are needed in this part of the Customer-oriented process?
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Sidney Vianna Interesting Discussion Should ISO 9004 be changed from a guidance standard to a requirements standard? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
A Should I take an online course for a career in Occupational Health and Safety? Career and Occupation Discussions 2
J Should a Class 1 medical device with an option to measure body weight be considered Class 1m? EU Medical Device Regulations 0
K Should APQP/PPAP has its own section in a QM? Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 1
S What should i choose for "testing procedure" characteristics? (N95) General Information Resources 0
P Should eIFU link per ISO 15223-1:2016 be added to labels out of scope of Reg 207/2012? EU Medical Device Regulations 1
S Which Sampling Plan(s) Should I Use? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 7
A Document release vs its related training. Which should come first? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 18
S Which department should prepare the control plan? could you show me a standard regarding to this matter. FMEA and Control Plans 17
J Help settle a disagreement: Should external providers of preventive maintenance be on your ASL? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
N Master Samples - What should we be keeping? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9
G Supplier delivered recent PPAP, should he deliver yearly layout inspection? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
John Broomfield Vote - Should ISO9004 Become a Requirements Standard? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
A Capability Study - in the beginning of your career what should you have known about the tool Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 11
J Should Loading and Unloading be Included in Cycle Times? Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 14
E Manufacturers should develop a testing device for covid19 Service Industry Specific Topics 0
T 510(k) submission - Which name should I use in the submission? Other US Medical Device Regulations 3
N ISO 19011:2018 - 5.4.2 "...audit program should engage in appropriate continual development..." Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 4
G Should I perform Gage R&R only at the beginning of a new project? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 6
DuncanGibbons Should the requirements FAA/EASA Part 21 be addressed within the QMS and AS9100D quality manual? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
M Should 510(k) Predicates be Actively Listed Devices? Other US Medical Device Regulations 12
B Why the Greek god Hephaestus should have done a design FMEA (DFMEA) on his giant robot APQP and PPAP 1
J On PFMEA for danger labels - Label always should be assigned severity 10 ? FMEA and Control Plans 3
H Who should be listed as the manufacturer/distributor on the box? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 15
M MDR, RED and LVD - Should our device comply with them? EU Medical Device Regulations 3
BeaBea How Many Processes should be created for each Department? Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 5
M Should volume of sales be factored into risk probability assessments? ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 33
MrTetris Should potential bugs be considered in software risk analysis? ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 5
S Should safety checks be included in the Control Plan? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
M Which incubation condition should be selected to recover both bacteria and fungus effectively Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 3
D Is there a specific location for PPE such as safety glass holders and glove dispensers should be mounted Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 10
Robert Stanley Which Registrar Should I Choose for ISO 9001:2015 registration? Registrars and Notified Bodies 10
M Who should receive the bills from suppliers and vendors, account payable or procurement? Consultants and Consulting 4
V IATF 16949 8.4.1 Control of externally provided processes, products and services - Should the CB be on our Approved Supplier List? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 10
A We are ISO 13485:2016 should we be audited to ISO 14971 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 16
E Received a Major finding during IATF Surveillance audit for loss of BIQS Level 3 (more than 6 SPPS in 6 months)...how should we address SYSTEMIC CA? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 11
J Organization merger. Should we keep two separate ISO 13485 certificates? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
S Companies that maintain your machine should be in ASL? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
S Use of "Shall" versus "Should" in Procedures ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 26
D Class II medical device - When should a complaint be closed? Customer Complaints 6
Sidney Vianna IATF 16949 News Presentations from the latest IATF Stakeholder Event - Expectation that IATF 16949 certification should equate with product quality. Misguided? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
L Clause 0.4 of ISO 9001 and EHS - Where should I stop the inclusion of EHS in my QMS ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
Ed Panek Part 11 Self Certify Memo - What else should it cover? Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 5
H Should I mention machine/Equipment password In SOP? Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 4
D How long should we keep the spare parts available for our medical device, after we have stopped the production? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 0
H Statistical Techniques Procedure - What should be included Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 4
Q How should I analyze measurement correlation between me and customer? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 12
Sidney Vianna Interesting Discussion ISO 9001:2024 - What should be changed in the next Edition of ISO 9001? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 113
N Should it even be on the hazard analysis (software)? FMEA and Control Plans 2
V Which batches should or could be considered for design validation and design verification? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 0

Similar threads

Top Bottom