Should the Quality Department be independent of Operations

M

muohio

#1
I work for a smallish steel coating facility. Recently the head of operations received a promotion that put him over my boss as well as the entire quality department. Before that we were an independent department reporting to the VP of manufacturing, who oversaw all the engineers, maintenance, operations, and quality. My question is this: Is having operations oversee the quality dept. create a sort of "conflict of interest"? Several areas where we can be prodded to make decisions that favor prime yield instead of customer satisfaction come to mind. Thanks for any feedback.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
#3
I work for a smallish steel coating facility. Recently the head of operations received a promotion that put him over my boss as well as the entire quality department. Before that we were an independent department reporting to the VP of manufacturing, who oversaw all the engineers, maintenance, operations, and quality. My question is this: Is having operations oversee the quality dept. create a sort of "conflict of interest"? Several areas where we can be prodded to make decisions that favor prime yield instead of customer satisfaction come to mind. Thanks for any feedback.
Whether or not independence is an issue is wholly dependent on local conditions, assuming there are no regulatory requirements. If there is a significant emphasis on "making the month" in billing, there's a good chance that the independence of QA would be a good thing. Ironically, that's also the type of situation where you're least likely to find an independent QA function, for obvious reasons. Beware of managers who, in giving the OK to ship NC product, describe it as a "business decision."
 
Q

qualityboi

#4
It shouldn't have to but because of human nature, conflict of interest which has happened many times in my career it should be separate. The mantra of having quality "embedded" into manufacturing sounds good in theory and works if the top management support the quality system. More often than not top management knows nothing of the quality system and appoints someone to "handle that stuff". In practice, keeping the quality department separate really helps to maintain the integrity of the company.
Often I wonder if someone from say the legal department really dug into my audit reports there are some write ups that could be interpreted as negligence on managements part.

Good luck!
 

Kales Veggie

People: The Vital Few
#5
I work for a smallish steel coating facility. Recently the head of operations received a promotion that put him over my boss as well as the entire quality department. Before that we were an independent department reporting to the VP of manufacturing, who oversaw all the engineers, maintenance, operations, and quality. My question is this: Is having operations oversee the quality dept. create a sort of "conflict of interest"? Several areas where we can be prodded to make decisions that favor prime yield instead of customer satisfaction come to mind. Thanks for any feedback.
It all depends on the local culture and the "quality" of the individuals in key positions.

The VP of Mfg is also operations. What is the difference? Is it a person issue and not a title issue?
 
M

muohio

#6
It all depends on the local culture and the "quality" of the individuals in key positions.

The VP of Mfg is also operations. What is the difference? Is it a person issue and not a title issue?
The current person in the position is actually the former head of operations. He received a change in title but essentially has the same responsibilities. VP of Mfg is over a lot more than operations, and he has a much broader scope involving business planning and direction. Very much hands off as far as the day to day. The new person is much more involved in day to day, and we get a lot of questions involving actual disposition of product, such as "why did you downclass this product", etc. So that in a nutshell is the difference.
 
K

kgott

#7
I work for a smallish steel coating facility. Recently the head of operations received a promotion that put him over my boss as well as the entire quality department. Before that we were an independent department reporting to the VP of manufacturing, who oversaw all the engineers, maintenance, operations, and quality. My question is this: Is having operations oversee the quality dept. create a sort of "conflict of interest"? Several areas where we can be prodded to make decisions that favor prime yield instead of customer satisfaction come to mind. Thanks for any feedback.
I can't disagree more. The quality department should not be in the business of regulating the quality of the product, that is the role of the process owners. Such a claim has its parraell in OHS where line managers believe that the safety advisors/whatever, should be responsible for regulating the behaviour of the workforce and not the supervisors or the managers.

Suggesting that quality people should regulate product quality is going back to the dark old days where its the worker not the system that produces bad product, unsafe behaviour or accidents.
 

Golfman25

Trusted Information Resource
#8
I can't disagree more. The quality department should not be in the business of regulating the quality of the product, that is the role of the process owners. Such a claim has its parraell in OHS where line managers believe that the safety advisors/whatever, should be responsible for regulating the behaviour of the workforce and not the supervisors or the managers.

Suggesting that quality people should regulate product quality is going back to the dark old days where its the worker not the system that produces bad product, unsafe behaviour or accidents.
The old "cops and robbers" system.

I would agree. The Quality "department" should be there to assist production, not regulate them. At some point, especially in smaller companies, the decision comes down to one person - ship or hold. Thus, "independence" is a myth anyway. Good luck.
 
K

KathySmith

#9
It doesn't matter were QC reports, if the quality person knows how to build a general consensus. At the end of day, the top guy can make the call to ship regardless of what the quality system says in a smallish shops. Know when to stand on principle and retreat or be pragmatic.

There are many times I was cornered, abused for not shipping, I instruct inspectors it's never their decision to send NC product. Have operations sign off on the inspection reports ok to ship. Of course, certain industries, bound by contract and specified customer requirements will frown on operation folks signing off on NC material.

Also be on guard for "fear".... Fear of change and a new head boss. The human nature stuff... now is not the time to be starting debates out in the shop on were quality needs to report. You will be the first on the new boss short list of changes. Quality is a customer service department to operations as well as customers. Be ready to have three bosses in a single day every day.
 
M

muohio

#10
I can't disagree more. The quality department should not be in the business of regulating the quality of the product, that is the role of the process owners. Such a claim has its parraell in OHS where line managers believe that the safety advisors/whatever, should be responsible for regulating the behaviour of the workforce and not the supervisors or the managers.

Suggesting that quality people should regulate product quality is going back to the dark old days where its the worker not the system that produces bad product, unsafe behaviour or accidents.
Having trouble figuring out what "claim" you disagree with. Being that I asked a question, seems very contrarion to disagree with it. If you have an opinion that's fine, I asked for them. Please quote the "claim" you're referring to.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
G Should the Quality Department originate a Request for Deviation to the Customer? Nonconformance and Corrective Action 3
L Supplier Approval Process – Should the Quality Department be Excluded? Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 7
M Should QA (Quality Assurance) be its own independent Department? Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 33
DuncanGibbons Should the requirements FAA/EASA Part 21 be addressed within the QMS and AS9100D quality manual? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
Sidney Vianna IATF 16949 News Presentations from the latest IATF Stakeholder Event - Expectation that IATF 16949 certification should equate with product quality. Misguided? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
F Quality Objectives - Where in the QMS Quality Objectives should be located ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
M Should Quality be an independent organization in aerospace company? Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 25
A Why Quality functions (QA, QC) should act independently ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
B Quality Records - Should any record be signed? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
O Should ISO 9001:2008 be treated as a standalone quality standard alongside AS9120A? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
S Should we get Quality Policy re-signed if the signatories leave? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
M What training or certificate should I take to work in Quality? Career and Occupation Discussions 2
L What are some SOPs that a Quality Manager should have? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 6
P What should a Quality Plan Include and Examples Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 3
T What should I put on my Quality Notice Board? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
F What Training should a Quality Manager have? Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 32
Q Engineering Documents Names should follow Quality Naming Coding? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
M What qualifications should a Quality Assurance Manager have? Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 3
D Use Remote Design Center - How should 7.3 be addressed in Quality Manual? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 13
JoCam What period of time should Quality Management Reviews cover? Management Review Meetings and related Processes 10
A How should I continue my quality career in U.S.? Career and Occupation Discussions 6
I What should be the Quality Inspection regime for a new plant? Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 2
somashekar The Quality Policy - How General or Specific should a Quality Policy be stated? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
G What should be in the Quality Open Items Register Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 5
J How many Quality Objectives should a company have ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
H Second Quality Engineer Position Interview - What should I brush up on? Career and Occupation Discussions 6
R NQA-1 Quality Manual vs. Standard - How much should they differ Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 7
C What Should We Deliver as an experienced team of Quality Specalists and Auditors ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
C How should I establish Quality Systems in my small company Manufacturing and Related Processes 7
T Where should Validation and/or Testing Report to? Engineering? Quality? Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 3
F Should I purchase a Quality System Kit? Design and Development of Products and Processes 14
A Quality Metrics that I should include if I were reporting Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 6
I Quality should own document control - WHY is finance getting involved?? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 5
S Quality Manual Review - Should the manual link all procedures Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 5
J Quality Policy - should a brief description of the company & its product be included? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
F Should I remove references to AS9120 / ISO 9001 from my Quality Manual and QMS? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 7
T What should a quality engineer be doing in a company (manufacturing)? Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 8
F Should a Quality Policy have Revision Control? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 65
S Should Quality System scope cover non-medical devices? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
G Definition Quality or Quality Assurance - The term "assurance" should not be used? Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations Listed Alphabetically 40
J Gage & Quality Burn Out - Should I stay in quality? Career and Occupation Discussions 13
D Should the average everday Quality Control Manager need a copy of ISO 17025? ISO 17025 related Discussions 5
K Quality Objectives - How in depth should we go with our quality objectives? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 25
N Quality Engineer Job Description - What should be the function of a Quality Engineer? Career and Occupation Discussions 9
J Should Quality folks be just policemen & policewomen? Philosophy, Gurus, Innovation and Evolution 73
S Should Quality Policy be marketing oriented? Contracting firm for aerospace software AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 4
C How should Quality Professionals dress? Career and Occupation Discussions 78
R Resourcing Proposals - Quality Team - Should include salaries and role detai Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
M Complete revamp of quality systems required - Major pitfalls I should try to avoid Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 12
B Should manufacturing efficiency be a quality function? Yes or No? Manufacturing and Related Processes 72

Similar threads

Top Bottom