Should we have Work Instructions for HR or not

reunalla

Involved In Discussions
#1
Hallo All!

I need some help about document.

I am arguing with the HR Manager of my company whether we should have work instructions for HR or not. We have global company procedures for the all locations in the World, we have some related to HR: about trainings, new hire etc. My opinion is that we have to have some plant level WIs for the HR processes as well since the global procedures are too general and in my opinion do not include all relevant info (e.g recording, record keeping), also they are in Englishe which is not my country's native. The guy does not accept my opinion and wants to see a quote from a standard.

7.5.1 only says "Controlled conditions shall include, as applicable the availability of work instructions, as necessary"
also
7.5.1.2 says: "The organization shall prepare documented work instructions for all employees having responsibilities for the operation of processes that impact conformity to product requirements."
I personally do not think that HR processes impact product quality so it is not very useably for me.

Any ideas who to convince him that we need to have plant level WIs in our native language? What quote can I show him?

Thanks in advance.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
J

Jamie_

#2
As mentioned by a couple of people upthread, we all do this differently. I personally use WI very sparingly and only for those things where there can be no deviation.

What kind of work instructions do you want them to have for HR? In our QMS HR is about training and related record keeping. I don't know what WI I would write for that as our record control matrix shows which records are to be kept, where, for how long, etc.

An example of a WI I have is how to fill out an NCF tag. The SOP states who is responsible, etc. but having a document which shows the tag fields and spells out what information is required makes it easier for our people to follow and I have it in all needed languages. That way if they are new or forget they can reference a handy WI - and the requirements never vary so I can laminate, post a controlled WI, and make it easier for them to comply.

I have 6 WI which I made after it was clear they would assist people in carrying out certain tasks step by step if they had more detailed instructions than the SOP. 3 are simple flow charts and two are step by step calibration instructions.

Edited to because I forgot to quote.
 

Uriel Alejandro

Involved In Discussions
#3
Hi Renualla

What kind of records do you want to control with this new WIs? Because if they are not the ones required by the standard it may be an extra load for your QMS.

I think the main criteria for create a new process should be if that process has a added value for your operation. Unnecessary processes are one of the most common waste (muda) in operations but one of the less considered.
My recommendation it?s to make an analysis of added value and show it to the process owner and someone of the top management and let them to decide but if they still don't think it?s needed for the organization it may not be kind of battle you want to fight. I have experienced something similar and it always was a nightmare try to deal with the corrective actions resulting of missing records because owners and management didn?t really cared about that information.

About the documents in English, for me it's the most critical, if they?re on a foreign language and it difficult understanding of users it totally have to be fixed.
 

reunalla

Involved In Discussions
#4
Hallo!

We accually have WIs, 10 all together:
about training for direct and indirect employees, new hire process, general tasks regarding for examle of each staff member's responsibility in trainings (technicians, engineers, shift leaders, trainer, team leaders - we have 1850 co-workers in this location, from which 1700 are operators at the lines) - also they discribe where and which form exactly we do need to keep the training records and incomming job applications

So we have the WI-s but the HR guy just does not want to keep them (to much work to check them once every year - yearly review of every document is required by company standard). The global procedures are very general and not in our language which is my main concern - based on my understanding the documents should be available to the person who needs to use them or to whom it may concern and I think something in a foreign language does not qualify as available, also the staff here besides our native speaks mostly German not English. I am totally not against to throw away the ones that we do not use or need but for example the ones about training responsibility and training record keeping are the ones I want to keep because we have issues in that area (missing trainings, missing training records, pepole do not want to train operators - and we just had 2 internal audits and both auditor wrote up that we have problems with training)
 
J

Jamie_

#5
I agree that documents in an language the people required to follow them cannot read are useless. Regarding words in the standard to force them into complying I'd go with the following:

4.2.3 e) "to ensure that documents remain legible and readily identifiable."

In common use legible usually refers to readable handwriting, but the definition is actually,
1.: capable of being read or deciphered,
2: capable of being discovered or understood

It's amazing to me this is even a conversation you have to have with them. It's common sense to make it as easy as possible for people to follow the procedure - because if they can't refer to it you're counting on them all getting it right based on memory. All it takes is one person to deviate and with nothing to reference compliance can be out the window.

But if you need explicit requirement from the standard I'd hang my hat on the use of the word legible. If they can't be read or understood they aren't legible to these people. If they want to get pedantic back and claim it meets the standard because they can be read/understood by others than they are just being difficult because that's counterproductive.


 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
M Who should write Departmental Work Instructions Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 6
D Should Work Instructions contain Tool Change Intervals? Inserts, Drills, End Mills ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 15
A How should I implement work instructions when we are sort of a job shop? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 6
T Work Instructions - Where and what departments should have them? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 25
B Should Tooling Documentation (such as tooling setup instructions) be Controlled? QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 1
J Should Loading and Unloading be Included in Cycle Times? Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 13
E Manufacturers should develop a testing device for covid19 Service Industry Specific Topics 0
T 510(k) submission - Which name should I use in the submission? Other US Medical Device Regulations 3
N ISO 19011:2018 - 5.4.2 "...audit program should engage in appropriate continual development..." Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 4
G Should I perform Gage R&R only at the beginning of a new project? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 6
DuncanGibbons Should the requirements FAA/EASA Part 21 be addressed within the QMS and AS9100D quality manual? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
M Should 510(k) Predicates be Actively Listed Devices? Other US Medical Device Regulations 12
B Why the Greek god Hephaestus should have done a design FMEA (DFMEA) on his giant robot APQP and PPAP 1
J On PFMEA for danger labels - Label always should be assigned severity 10 ? FMEA and Control Plans 3
H Who should be listed as the manufacturer/distributor on the box? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 15
M MDR, RED and LVD - Should our device comply with them? EU Medical Device Regulations 2
BeaBea How Many Processes should be created for each Department? Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 5
M Should volume of sales be factored into risk probability assessments? ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 33
MrTetris Should potential bugs be considered in software risk analysis? ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 5
S Should safety checks be included in the Control Plan? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
M Which incubation condition should be selected to recover both bacteria and fungus effectively Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 3
D Is there a specific location for PPE such as safety glass holders and glove dispensers should be mounted Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 10
Robert Stanley Which Registrar Should I Choose for ISO 9001:2015 registration? Registrars and Notified Bodies 10
M Who should receive the bills from suppliers and vendors, account payable or procurement? Consultants and Consulting 4
V IATF 16949 8.4.1 Control of externally provided processes, products and services - Should the CB be on our Approved Supplier List? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 10
A We are ISO 13485:2016 should we be audited to ISO 14971 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 16
E Received a Major finding during IATF Surveillance audit for loss of BIQS Level 3 (more than 6 SPPS in 6 months)...how should we address SYSTEMIC CA? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 11
J Organization merger. Should we keep two separate ISO 13485 certificates? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
S Companies that maintain your machine should be in ASL? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
S Use of "Shall" versus "Should" in Procedures ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 21
D Class II medical device - When should a complaint be closed? Customer Complaints 6
Sidney Vianna IATF 16949 News Presentations from the latest IATF Stakeholder Event - Expectation that IATF 16949 certification should equate with product quality. Misguided? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
L Clause 0.4 of ISO 9001 and EHS - Where should I stop the inclusion of EHS in my QMS ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
Ed Panek Part 11 Self Certify Memo - What else should it cover? Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 5
H Should I mention machine/Equipment password In SOP? Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 4
D How long should we keep the spare parts available for our medical device, after we have stopped the production? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 0
H Statistical Techniques Procedure - What should be included Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 4
Q How should I analyze measurement correlation between me and customer? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 12
Sidney Vianna Interesting Discussion ISO 9001:2024 - What should be changed in the next Edition of ISO 9001? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 82
N Should it even be on the hazard analysis (software)? FMEA and Control Plans 2
V Which batches should or could be considered for design validation and design verification? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 0
L A Taiwan company want to sell Class I medical device (510(k) exempt) on Amazon, should we register with FDA? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 4
M Routine testing of medical electrical systems - What specific electrical safety tests should be performed? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 5
G ISO 17025:2017 7.1.2 - Should I produce a document for the customer? ISO 17025 related Discussions 8
F Quality Objectives - Where in the QMS Quality Objectives should be located ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
P ISO 80369-7 standard - Interpreting which Parts should be in scope Other Medical Device Related Standards 7
V Who should define and own the Design and Development Plan and how to maintain the updates and revisions. ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
A How should the Medical Device OEMs be declared to ANVISA? Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
D Should "Waste" be included as Output in SIPOC Chart? Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 8
N Control plan evaluation methods - Which methods should be carried over from the PFMEA? FMEA and Control Plans 3

Similar threads

Top Bottom