SBS - The best value in QMS software

SI 5 06 - ISO/TS 169494:2002 7.4.1.2 Supplier quality management system development

Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Howard Atkins

Forum Administrator
Staff member
Admin
#22
Re: SI 5 06 - ISO/TS 169494:2002 7.4.1.2 Supplier quality management system developme

SI's are mandatory from publication
These requirements already appeared in the Ford and GM CSR's.

There is in fact a legal loophole to the demand of 100%certification to ISO9001
 

Douglas E. Purdy

Quite Involved in Discussions
#23
Re: SI 5 06 - ISO/TS 169494:2002 7.4.1.2 Supplier quality management system developme

This discussion has motivated me to purchase the new 17021. Hardly an opportunity purchase....not like a new tool...:biglaugh:

Both documents are focused on development and maintenance of a creditable audit program. The only area that I see may have some additional value to this discussion is Section 4.2 of 17021 that deals with Impartiality. 17021 is written for Certification Bodies and issues of ownership/partnership or other business relationships that may jeopardize impartiality are discussed here. I think this may also be an issue with 2nd party audits of suppliers with whom the organization has some arrangement of mutual benefit. Section 4.2 points out four areas called "threats to impartiality":

1. Self interest threats: Interests the client has in assessing the auditee as compliant [my words here and below, not 17021]. How about "spin off businesses"? My owner's cousin runs the company that supplies us with parts (See 4. Intimidation below)
2. Self review threats: Looking at your own work. Don't send an engineer to audit a vendor that builds parts according to your prints. Can I assign purchasing people, QC inspectors, Shipping and Receving people?
3. Familiarity: The vendor has bailed us out of many jams and we love them.
4. Intimidation: If the vendor audit report shows noncompliant areas, what will my registrar's anal-retentive auditor think about my status. Am I gaining another finding from my registrar everytime I write a nonconformance to my vendor?

Some food for thought in each of these.

It is still snowing.......
What about Section 9? What does it add to the SI?

Thanks,
Doug
 

Douglas E. Purdy

Quite Involved in Discussions
#24
Re: SI 5 06 - ISO/TS 169494:2002 7.4.1.2 Supplier quality management system developme

The company just procured ISO/IEC 17021 and when I began Reading Section 9, I became very upset with this Sanctioned Interpretation. The 10 pages that make up Section 9, Process Requirements, is full of requirements for a certification body. Do we really have to meet all these requirements in order to establish a 2nd Party Audit System for those suppliers who are not registered to ISO 9001? I would like to see how someone, who is not a certification body, developed their 2nd Party Audit System.

(See also ISO 17021:2006), Section 9.

That one goofy looking sentence really adds a whallop to the Sanctioned Interpretation!

Doug
 

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Staff member
Admin
#25
Re: SI 5 06 - ISO/TS 169494:2002 7.4.1.2 Supplier quality management system developme

Do we really have to meet all these requirements in order to establish a 2nd Party Audit System for those suppliers who are not registered to ISO 9001?
(See also ISO 17021:2006), Section 9.

That one goofy looking sentence really adds a whallop to the Sanctioned Interpretation!

Doug
I understand your frustration, but the phrase (See also ISO 17021:2006), Section 9. can be understood differently from The organization must comply with ISO 17021:2006, Section 9.
As long as you ask here, you will get opinions and opinions only. The only authoritative source for a definite answer would be the IATF/IAOB. I would encourage you to contact them.
 

Wes Bucey

Prophet of Profit
#26
Re: SI 5 06 - ISO/TS 169494:2002 7.4.1.2 Supplier quality management system developme

I understand your frustration, but the phrase (See also ISO 17021:2006), Section 9. can be understood differently from The organization must comply with ISO 17021:2006, Section 9.
As long as you ask here, you will get opinions and opinions only. The only authoritative source for a definite answer would be the IATF/IAOB. I would encourage you to contact them.
I've always looked at this type of "dilemma" similarly to the way I looked at tax laws as a business exec:

  1. First, I talked to my professional advisors and determined a "best course of action." (In this case, an organization registered to a Standard would ask its registrar for an opinion/interpretation which the registrar would use during an audit based on the organization's circumstances in the same manner as I asked our CPA and attorneys.)
  2. Second, if we (us and advisors) couldn't agree, we considered asking the IRS for a "letter opinion." (Actually, this isn't as scary as it sounds - akin to following Sidney's advice re: IATF/IAOB. )
Usually, our decision to seek a letter opinion only came about if we faced a criminal sanction (read jail) versus a civil one (read $$$) - for $$$ sanctions, many organizations are willing to gamble; only fools gamble with jail time. With TS, the worst that can happen is the registrar changes his mind and issues an NC - which the organization then "fixes." Doesn't seem like a terrible penalty or high likelihood of occurrence (think of this as FMEA.)
 

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Staff member
Admin
#27
Re: SI 5 06 - ISO/TS 169494:2002 7.4.1.2 Supplier quality management system developme

With TS, the worst that can happen is the registrar changes his mind and issues an NC - which the organization then "fixes." Doesn't seem like a terrible penalty or high likelihood of occurrence (think of this as FMEA.)
Wes has a very good point here. If your registrar is expected to confirm if your supplier oversight process follows the ISO 17021 Section 9 requirements, chances are, the TS auditors have never seen nor have a copy of ISO 17021....:mg:
 

Wes Bucey

Prophet of Profit
#30
Re: SI 5 06 - ISO/TS 169494:2002 7.4.1.2 Supplier quality management system developme

Re: ethics of sharing.
My interpretation is the INTENDED recipient (Doug) can do anything he wants with the message.

My interpretation of the message itself:
"ignore the clause!"
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
G ISO 13485 Certification - Can we get the ISO 13485 certification prior to shipment of the device? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
Richard Regalado Informational ISO/IEC DIS 27001:2021, to be published soon. IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 0
Q Audit report template ISO 9001/14001 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 13
N Does anyone use SGS for ISO 13485 / CE certification Registrars and Notified Bodies 0
Q Process matrix examples of ISO 9001 & 14001 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
S Need ISO 15189:2012 Documentation toolkit. Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 0
chris1price Archiving of paper records - ISO 9001 7.5.3.1b Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 4
M Transferring ISO 17025 from one company to another ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
D Common practices in ISO 9001 deployment ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 17
Q ISO 9001-2015 Internal audit finding Internal Auditing 12
P Audit check for IT company (ISO 9001) ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
M Label Making & Printing Standards ISO / ASTM ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
Sidney Vianna Interesting Discussion Should ISO 9004 be changed from a guidance document to a requirements standard? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
Ed Panek ISO 13485:2016 Section 5.5.3 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
Q Do these certificates of calibration meet ISO 9001 requirements for traceability to NIST? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
ebrahim QMS as per ISO 13485, Clause 4.2 Requirements for regulatory purposes for Medical Devices Authorized Representatives. ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
S ISO 2768-mk print call out Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 11
T ISO 17024, clauses 4.3.8. and 5.1.1. Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 4
C ISO 14001:2015 6.1.3 Compliance Obligations - Legal requirements monitoring ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 0
C Requirement to link Quality Manual to ISO 9001 clause numbers? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 13
D ISO 13485 scope (implantable) - Polymers for dental application EU Medical Device Regulations 9
W First time being audited (ISO 9001), asking for advice ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
John C. Abnet ISO 26262 ISO 26262 - Road vehicles – Functional safety 3
Marc ISO 26262- Road vehicles – Functional safety ISO 26262 - Road vehicles – Functional safety 0
John C. Abnet ISO 26262 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 0
A ISO/DIS 15223-1:2020 - Country of manufacture label (IEC 60417 No. 6049) - Which national law requires this symbol? Other Medical Device Related Standards 0
P ISO 14644 Class 8 Cleanroom Air Filter Requirements Other Medical Device Related Standards 4
K PDCA cycle and ISO processes alternative model Quality Management System (QMS) Manuals 14
N ISO 13485 7.3.9 Change control in medical device software ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
A ISO 13485 procedure change and reflect to legacy manufacture items ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
D ISO 13485 & CE Certification for Surgical Gloves CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 0
S ISO 11137- Simulated product vs SIP Other Medical Device Related Standards 2
D Which ISO Standard to purchase? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
V ISO 10360-5: 2020 Gap analysis and Action plan Excel .xls Spreadsheet Templates and Tools 1
Q ISO 9001 - Reseller Exclusions ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
S Inventory Listing and ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
C ISO 45001 6.1.2.1 Hazard Identification Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 1
T The difference between ISO 14644-3:2005 and ISO 14644:2019 Other Medical Device Related Standards 2
S Any ISO standards around Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning? Medical Information Technology, Medical Software and Health Informatics 4
R AS9100D internal audit checklist or ISO 9001 2015 to AS9100 D AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
M ISO 13485:2016 Certification Scope ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
N ISO 9001 - Training business with fewer than 5 employees ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
P Should eIFU link per ISO 15223-1:2016 be added to labels out of scope of Reg 207/2012? EU Medical Device Regulations 1
J Opportunity in ISO 9001:2015 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 27
D Reports under change management | ISO 13485:2016 & ISO 9001:2015 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
P ISO 8 classified medical manufacturing room Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 1
Le Chiffre Online training available for ISO/IEC 17021-1: Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of management systems Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 3
B ISO 6508 and portable hardness measurement instruments General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 0
M Scope for ISO 13485 Certification of a Translation Service Provider ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 17
S Knee Implant (Femoral -Cobalt chrome)-Sub chronic toxicity test (ISO 10993-11)choice of root Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 2

Similar threads

Top Bottom