Skipping Document Revision Levels

D

DocGuy

#1
I want to throw out a question to the forum regarding skipping revisions on documentation.

Issue is that this part is currently at Rev A, and on of my collegues checked it out in January to rev it to B. That change is on hold, and not sure when or if it will be resolved.

Another collegue made revisions but also included the changes from A to B but had parts made to C before the document change was approved formerly through our Change Process.

How do other Medical Device companies or other industries handle this. I only skip I,O,Q and it's written in a procedure.

Would a memo to file be sufficient, would that hold up in an FDA audit?

Thanks,
Kevin
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
J

JaneB

#3
What's the common sense solution? It sounds as though rev. C has been approved and released, yes?

In that case, I'd write a File Note/similar to explain why the version jumped from Rev A to C. Naturally, I'd include in the File Note that the changes from A to B were also reviewed and approved via the release of version C.

Cannot answer the question of an FDA audit - someone else probably can - but this would satisfy any reasonable external auditor.

I don't understand what you mean about rev B still being 'on hold' - that one has to now be cancelled. Any further changes MUST be to revC as normal (and taken up to D).
 
A

Al Dyer

#4
Sounds like total disregard for a document control system that should be in place and the total process revision aspect of an entire manufacturing system. Discuss with us why or how you think this happened?????

Al...
 

harry

Super Moderator
#5
FDA or not, the expectation of a perfect record is a myth. What is more important is having a system that is able to demonstrate or prove that nonconformances or breaches can be detected and acted upon.

Is this an isolated incident or were there similar issues previously? Set the relevant provisions in your system into motion and take appropriate actions as provided.
 
K

Ka Pilo

#6
FDA or not, the expectation of a perfect record is a myth. What is more important is having a system that is able to demonstrate or prove that nonconformances or breaches can be detected and acted upon.

Is this an isolated incident or were there similar issues previously? Set the relevant provisions in your system into motion and take appropriate actions as provided.
I agree with Harry. If there is nonconformity to the Control of Documents Procedure, you need to record such non-conformity thru your CPAR/CAPA, determine the root causes of non-conformity and corrective action with corresponding timelines, implement action plans and review effectiveness, follow up implemented action plan.

Make your Corrective Action Procedure works for you.
 
J

JaneB

#7
FDA or not, the expectation of a perfect record is a myth. What is more important is having a system that is able to demonstrate or prove that nonconformances or breaches can be detected and acted upon..
Yes, I agree totally Harry.

That's the real purpose.
 
J

JaneB

#8
If there is nonconformity to the Control of Documents Procedure, you need to record such non-conformity thru your CPAR/CAPA, determine the root causes of non-conformity and corrective action with corresponding timelines, implement action plans and review effectiveness, follow up implemented action plan.

Make your Corrective Action Procedure works for you.
Sorry, I disagree with this also. While I do agree that one's CA procedure should work for one, I definitely don't want to use a sledgehammer to crack a nut. After all, we are merely talking about ONE single instance of a breach here.

Are you seriously saying that you would move straight into issuing a formal NC on the basis of one single, solitary instance, without even taking any time to find out a bit more about how/why it occurred? Without having any more evidence than that? :confused:

I would not. To me, that's pretty much a recipe for making the name of Quality a dirty word and overly extreme action for one single instance.
 
K

Ka Pilo

#9
Sorry, I disagree with this also. While I do agree that one's CA procedure should work for one, I definitely don't want to use a sledgehammer to crack a nut. After all, we are merely talking about ONE single instance of a breach here.

Are you seriously saying that you would move straight into issuing a formal NC on the basis of one single, solitary instance, without even taking any time to find out a bit more about how/why it occurred? Without having any more evidence than that? :confused:

I would not. To me, that's pretty much a recipe for making the name of Quality a dirty word and overly extreme action for one single instance.
Your reasoning is sound and fair.
 
D

DocGuy

#10
Thank you all,

The procedure describes the process for engineering changes to a released production level part. The problem is Engineering didn't follow the procedure.

The document control system is manual and when someone wants to revise a part or document there is no communication with document control.

Revision B is on a change document and the package is stalled sitting on someone's desk, another engineer went into the engineering system and made a change to the same part and the engineering system forces the revision to change to C.

The change to revision C is now in a new change package. Revision B was never released in the documentation system.

I so wish my company could afford to buy an electronic document control system, working a manual system is so frustrating and plain tiring.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
S Skipping internal audits in internal laboratory IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 15
B Do IFU designs have to be document controlled under ISO 13485? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
C Certificate of Conformance Form - COC for each customer a controlled document? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
A Document "Correspondence IATF 16949 vs ISO13485" available? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 0
R Document Retention - Discard hard-copies after scanning? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
P Mylar plot suppliers in accordance with D6-51991 document AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 4
A Document Change Notice vs complete System re-write Manufacturing and Related Processes 4
Q Document approval through SharePoint (without signature) Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 4
S What is considered a "core algorithm"? (From an FDA guidance document) Medical Information Technology, Medical Software and Health Informatics 4
U Document Approval - Software company ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
O Please, help with document on ISO/ TS 17758 and (IDF 87: 1979). Thank you. Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
K Proper document of SMPS used in infant warmer for IEC 60601-1 testing IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
I Nitpicking on document released dates ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
I Document Control on Log Files ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
Q Refusal to Document Complaints Customer Complaints 39
Q Tracking Procedure Revisions (Document Control) Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 9
C Document Control Stamps - Does anyone still stamp their documents? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 24
I Master Document Access - ISO 9001:2015 clause 7.5.3 Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 5
I Question 1 - Nitpicking on Document Approval - can a document approval record be separate? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
I Control of Documentation Distribution - Document Control ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
T Advice needed - Environmental MS - unwritten but customer requests policy document ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 5
T Control of downloaded document copies by employees Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
T Document control ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
I Is highlighting on a printed document considered a change? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
C QMS Document Management Software Recommendations Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools and Solutions 16
E Part 11 Compliance, Excel living documents (i.e. document master list, equipment list, approved supplier list) Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 3
Sidney Vianna Informational New IAQG Document - AS9100 Clarifications of Intent AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 3
S How to determine & document Organizational Knowledge of a company Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 4
D Are medical device companies required to document every change made to their website? Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
M Informational IMDRF draft document – Principles and Practices for Medical Device Cybersecurity Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Nonconformity for missing form number on the job description document Nonconformance and Corrective Action 1
R Training Matrix for Document revisions ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
S Controlled Document Location Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
M Setting deadlines (ex. 45 days) for Document Registration & Review Cycle Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
M Informational IMDRF draft document – Requirements for Regulatory Authority Recognition of Conformity Assessment Bodies Conducting Medical Device Regulatory Reviews Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
B AS9110 Audit Check Sheet wanted Excel or Word Document AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 2
D Document review on already approved registrations requested by China's NMPA? China Medical Device Regulations 3
O Vendor vs Engineering Document Control ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
Z 21 CFR and Annex 11 mapping document Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 1
A ISO9001:2015 Document control and training aids ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
Sidney Vianna AS9100 News New AS9104-1 Document to be released around April 2020 AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 1
I Tracking Protoype Changes; 8D or simple document revision? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
H Transfer of Document Ownership Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
M Informational IMDRF proposed document – IMDRF terminologies for categorized Adverse Event Reporting (AER): terms, terminology structure and codes (Edition 4) – Anne Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
GreatNate Document Control info - What is required on a controlled form/document for ISO 9001: 2015? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
G Warning about Deltronic Gage Pins - The "Certification of Accuracy" document General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 13
M Informational EU – Guidance document Implant Card relating to the application of Article 18 Regulation (EU) 2017/745 of the European Parliament and of the Council o Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 2
M Informational Health Canada guidance document – Pre-market Requirements for Medical Device Cybersecurity Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
G ISO 17025:2017 7.1.2 - Should I produce a document for the customer? ISO 17025 related Discussions 8
J Document Control Software Needed ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
Similar threads


















































Top Bottom