Source of practice to Evaluate Risks? (ISO 9001:2015)

[QAMTY]

Hi everybody

When analysing risks under 9001 2015, lately on the web, I have seen some practices to do a more complete assessment.

When a risk is found, it is suggested to consider several perspectives:

Finance, Clients, processes, training, stakeholders and interested parties
it is ranked each perspective and the final value it is the average.

E.g. not having the ISO certification (risk) , in general, we can give a value
based on past events or what we have in mind at that time, but when is evaluated under every perspective, we may have different final value.

I know it may be better this method (more precise), but I wonder, where is the source of this method or idea?

I heard somewhere that is based on Kaplan scorecard method, but not on ISO.

The idea is to have more knowledge in case of implementing it.

Thanks for your help.

 

[dsanabria]

Hi everybody

When analysing risks under 9001 2015, lately on the web, I have seen some practices to do a more complete assessment.

When a risk is found, it is suggested to consider several perspectives:

Finance, Clients, processes, training, stakeholders and interested parties
it is ranked each perspective and the final value it is the average.

E.g. not having the ISO certification (risk) , in general, we can give a value
based on past events or what we have in mind at that time, but when is evaluated under every perspective, we may have different final value.

I know it may be better this method (more precise), but I wonder, where is the source of this method or idea?

I heard somewhere that is based on Kaplan scorecard method, but not on ISO.

The idea is to have more knowledge in case of implementing it.

Thanks for your help.

To expand your perspective go to the Supply Chain Management Handbook and download 7.3.2 Risk Management Storyboard.

(note: you might need to sign in - free and no harassment)

http://www.sae.org/servlets/registr...T_TYPE=SCMHGeneral&PAGE=getSCMHBOOK&REF=login