Spark Testing for Coating Applications

E

energy

#1
Does anybody have experience in calibrating a High Frequency Generator Tester for Leak Detection? We have an Electro Technic Products Model BD-60 (2,000-40,000 @ 1/2 Megahertz Frequency) that is used to detect pin holes in our Pressure Vessels interior lining. My question has to do with the Calibrator we purchased to determine the proper spark length (gap). We will be, undoubtably, be questioned on the calibration of this device by our future Registrar Auditor. The instructions that came with the Calibrator has caused me some concern as to the proper method for determining the actual voltage applied to the coated surface. Any help will be appreciated. I figure I would try here before getting into it with the Manufacturer. You know, practical hands-on experience?
:ko: :smokin:
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Jerry Eldred

Forum Moderator
Super Moderator
#2
I don't think I'll be of much solace. I don't know anything about the particular manufacturer of the unit. But my experience has been that manufacturer's calibration instructions range anywhere from excellent to nothing.

In the cases where there is apparently nothing, there is no substitute in my experience for doing the digging. you'll have to pull out the claimed specifications, then spend some time on the phone with them digging out their method for making the measurements traceable.

There is the possibility in some cases that manufacturer's won't be forthcoming. The best you can do in some cases is get their method good or bad, and use that method. If the traceability seems inadequate, there is a grey line somewhere between doing it the same way the manufacturer does... period; and determining the manufacturer's method simply isn't adequate.

I took a look at their website. I didn't see any plu/minus tolerances listed. Some of the issue depends on how tight they spec the units. If it is simply a range of voltages, it isn't uncommon to see a spec of < for the bottom end to > for the top end. If that is the case, the required method won't be any more stringent than the spec (which in my example is very loose).

I think the test method would probably need to be a high voltage probe with adequate bandwidth and voltage. I'd be curious to see the calibration instructions. If you have something you could email to me, I may be able to give you some more detailed comment offline.
 
E

energy

#3
Thanks, Jerry

I kind of thought so. You're interest in this is appreciated. The fact that you went to their website looking for assistance, impressed me. I will scan the instructions and send them to you along with what I see as a problem. Please stay tuned. :bigwave: :ko: :smokin:
 
E

energy

#4
What, me Worry?

Jerry,

The concern I had regarding the amount of voltage applied to the lining of our vessels has diminished considerably since I obtained the Operating Sheet for the Calibrator. The instructions are pretty much what you alluded to in your post. Statements such as “may vary between 200-400V per Mil of thickness” and “to adjust sensitivity, reduce sensitivity somewhat” and “there is approx. ¼” spark difference between starting voltage and breaking voltage”, indicates that there is no exact voltage measurement possible between coating applications. It would drive someone with a desire to “measure” actual voltage, batty. The calibrator gets you in the ballpark with the generator settings. So, I can have the machine set to deliver a voltage between 2 to 4kV for a 10 Mils of coating. 4kV-8kV for 20 mils and so on. We typically apply a minimum of 60 mils up to 80-100 mils. It’s a spray and bake operation. You can do the math. One good thing came from this, besides peace of mind. Whoever wrote our work instruction saying we apply 6000-8000 Volts to our lining must have only read the first sentence, or were out to lunch. As I was simulating the spark gap we usually use, the calibrator was indicating approx. 25,000 Volts. I was verifying the procedure, before releasing it. We will put in the voltage ranges we may be obtaining in the procedure and simply scribe a reference mark on the power setting and the sensitivity setting to make sure that the knobs are in the same location all the time. (approx.) Once a quarter, we will verify the settings and ranges and document it. As for the Calibrator, I will probably send it out to the Manufacturer every two years for its own verification. Maybe three years. The use for this device is really to make sure that you are not applying excessive voltage/corona that could damage the lining and enough voltage to ensure that there are no pinholes or bare spots. There is a wide spread between the two parameters. Thanks for the response. If you see anything here that you think would cause an Auditor concern, let me know.
And, yes, we have self calibrating Coating Thickness Tester.

:ko: :smokin:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
S GR&R for Hardness Tester and Arc Spark Spectrometer Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 15
Q Is anyone using MasterControl Spark? I have a question ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
C Uncertainty Estimation for Spark Optical Emission Device Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 1
E XRF vs. Spark Test for RoHS Compliance Verification RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 24
Marc Power cuts in Germany spark wave of blackouts across Europe World News 2
M Cosmetic Shelf Life Testing Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 2
S Safety testing IEC 60601 series Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
M EE's - Laptops/Printer Change and Emissions Testing IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 6
keya1tos EU to UK plug adapter correct testing standard CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 8
D IEC 60601-1-2: Is EMC immunity testing required for a device without essential performance? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 15
M Oral irritation testing Medical Information Technology, Medical Software and Health Informatics 0
A Fire Testing - EN 50339 Not 20 minutes ISO 17025 related Discussions 0
M Biological testing at the end of the real time of MD Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
M In Vitro irritation testing according to ISO 10993-23 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
R SaMD Performance Testing US Medical Device Regulations 5
J 'Failure rate leading to false-negatives and repeat testing' - MDCG and Common Tech Specs Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
M Extractables testing replicates - Chemical Characterization ISO 10993-18 EU Medical Device Regulations 2
C Strategies to Mitigate Fails in DV Testing Design and Development of Products and Processes 3
E 17025 Accredited Microbiological Testing Laboratory ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
X Looking for 17025 auditor to perform internal audit on IT software testing laboratory ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
J Design Verification Testing and Statistics Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 3
W External PSU Providing a MOOP -- Will This Necessitate Conducted Emissions Testing? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
G How to Record Informal Testing (Not Verification/Validation) Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 15
J Medical Device Component Change - Testing, Sampling Criteria ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 3
R Microbiological test (USP61, USP62, USP71, ISO 11137.1, ISO11137.2) --- Testing flow chart Other Medical Device Related Standards 0
R GB9706.1:2020 - in-country testing China Medical Device Regulations 0
A Bench Testing US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
R Validation of Software used in Verification Testing ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
M Do i need to have equipment validation if 100% testing is completed? Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 6
E Biocompatibility testing of our applied part seems redundant Other Medical Device Related Standards 2
A Recommended testing methods for weather stripping Manufacturing and Related Processes 6
T Shrinkage Testing for EPDM Material Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 5
J Managing design verification regression testing of design changes Design and Development of Products and Processes 1
D Conductivity Water Samples testing temperature Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 2
G Pricing Structure for Physical Mechanical Testing of Labs Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
S Skipped/Reduced testing in Pharma for Raw materials and Intermediates Manufacturing and Related Processes 0
S Pharmaceutical Shelf Life Testing Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 0
D How to testing of Pressure relief valve as per API 6D ? Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 1
J Impact Testing--Is conversion between Izod and Sharpy Possible? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
O Should a Covid vaccine and testing policy be included as part of ISO9001 or AS9100 risk management? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
V How to select the tests for proficiency testing Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 0
B Customer Preference Testing Customer and Company Specific Requirements 2
N Pre-Clinical Performance Testing Design and Development of Products and Processes 3
I Software (SaMD) mobile application verification testing: objective evidence Medical Information Technology, Medical Software and Health Informatics 2
I How to find required testing for a specific device? Other US Medical Device Regulations 3
J CQI-9v4 Alternative TUS Testing Methods Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 1
M ASTM F1717 Static and Dynamic Testing 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
T Mold Limits for Microbiology Testing Other Medical Device Related Standards 3
S Orthopedic implant sterility testing Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
H Independence between the development and testing IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 6

Similar threads

Top Bottom