P
Palt88
Two comments:
1. Each cavity must be evaluated separately. Mixing streams of production will only confound the data. The delta Xbars between cavities will impact the evaluation of sigma.
2. Since injection molding is an auto-correlated process, the use of Xbar/R charts are invalid as the premise of independence has been violated (again sigma will not be accurately estimated). The more appropriate tool should be IX/MR.
1. Ok but following each cavities separately is almost impossible to manage...
I can see that in case of variations, all cavities separately , or the mean of a "shot", is going have the same trends. Is this match with the subject you are thinking of?
2 thanks for the point. Do you mean it's better to follow moving range of standard and/or mean of subgroups?
Thanks
Last edited by a moderator: