Special Vs Non-Special Processes

#1
I've been looking for easy and simple way to assess Special Vs Non-Special processes for validation purpose. I don't simply want to depend upon what manufacturing engineer tells me. Is reading their mfg procedure or walk through the Mfg process itself would benefit? please help.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Staff member
Admin
#2
Your question is not clear. Are you asking how to determine if a process should be considered "special" and be validated?

Or are you asking how to determine the validation of special processes?

Have you looked at the "similar discussion threads"? scroll down.
 
#3
I'm asking for the easy way or tools to assess the mfg processes and sub-processes to see if they are special, hence I can perform the validation. I'm not worried about how to perform validation part. Thank you.
 

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Staff member
Admin
#4
There is no "easy" method.

You have to assess what are the critical characteristics of the products after the processes and ascertain if you can determine by examination if such characteristics are achieved or not, without a destructive test.

If you can't, very likely, you have to control process parameters which have demonstrated (by validation, including destructive testing) that results in conforming product.

One must have a good understanding of the product, application, context, materials and production processes to determine if the process needs validation or not.
 

Big Jim

Super Moderator
#5
If the only way to see if something turned out correctly is with destructive testing then it is clearly a special process.

If it can be determined with inspection or test, but the inspection or test isn't economically feasible, you should consider it as a special process.

There can be other factors to consider as well, but the one that fall into the two above categories should be clear and you should start with them.

The poster child list for special processes include welding, brazing, soldering, heat treating, and plating. Often other coatings and painting fall into that category.

This is not an exhaustive list.
 

armani

Involved In Discussions
#6
OK, but what about the fact that the inspection itself is considered special process? - see NADCAP...:(
A process can be a special process....but inspection of a process can be a special process too?? That doesnt fit the definition, because the inspection cannot be inspected etc...
That confuses me.
 

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Staff member
Admin
#9
Why are you still referring to the 2008 edition? There is a REQUIREMENT in 9001 that certain processes need to be validated and re-validated. Most Non Destructive Examinations have to be performed by specially qualified personnel, using specialized equipment and following specialized methods. That screams validation. Try doing an X-ray testing without any training, for example. Not only you will not accomplish the end goal, but might getting yourself exposed to nocive radiation from a radioactive source. Without a question, most NDT processes need to be validated, due to their nature and characteristics. If you have a specific example you want to discuss, bring it up for discussion.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
A Non-destructive testing methods are special processes? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 18
A Special Procedures for Non Aerospace Customers AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
D Control charts for non-normal distributions - Do I need to do anything special? Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 5
samer Oracle computer records - Special procedure for dealing with non-paper Records? Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 2
J 1.11 Preliminary Identification of Special Product and Process Characteristics APQP and PPAP 4
J EU MDR getting closer - Special offer for Elsmar members 10/2020 EU Medical Device Regulations 9
earl62 What is the best way to control special characteristics in Control plan? Is it Mandatory to have SPC for IATF 16949? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
Y What are different Special Inspection Level 1-4 and General spesification 1-3 ? AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 0
L Special Processes for SERVICES AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 10
K PSA Special characteristics Customer and Company Specific Requirements 0
Watchcat Advantages to pursuing a Special 510(k) instead of a Traditional 510(k) Other US Medical Device Regulations 5
qualprod Managing a "special" customer into the QMS? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 10
S Special 510(K) - Labeling change from Rx to OTC Other US Medical Device Regulations 11
M Special Controls and Class II Medical Devices Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 18
A ISO 10993-7:2008/ Amd.1:2019 - Classification of special populations Other Medical Device Related Standards 3
H SPC for special characteristics - CSR - Control of SC and CC Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 1
L Special Processes - Technical reason concerning torque - Anaerobic compounds Manufacturing and Related Processes 10
M Informational US FDA Final Guidance – Special Premarket Notification [510(k)] Pathway Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
F Replacement Bone Screws - Traditional 510(k) or Special 510(k)? Other US Medical Device Regulations 7
F Assignment of Special Characteristics to government regulations IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
qualprod ISO 9001:2015 8.5.1 f - Scope with customer special process requirements ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
J ISO 13485 - 7.5.2 cleanliness , 6.4.2 validation of special processes, and 6.4.2 contamination ability to be exempt? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
L Injection Moulding Process (Special Process) Validation Food Safety - ISO 22000, HACCP (21 CFR 120) 2
S The key differences in 510k types - Traditional vs. Abbreviated vs. Special US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 0
D I'm new in IMDS special using the IMDS application Manufacturing and Related Processes 8
S VW Special status condition IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
K Letter to file vs Special 510 for additional accessory in orthopaedic kit Other US Medical Device Regulations 1
P Special 510(k) - Modified Medical Device Description Other US Medical Device Regulations 8
P V&V for Special 510k 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
F CQI-23 Special Process Molding - Controls IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
B AS9100 - Are special process suppliers required to be NADCAP accredited? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 15
P Sanctioned Interpretations - IATF 16949 Cl. 8.3.3.3 Special characteristics IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
E IATF 16949 Cl. 8.2.3.1.2 - Customer-designated special characteristics IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
T Customer special status and initial IATF certification IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 12
J NADCAP - Supplier Special Processes Certifications Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
D Customer-Designated Special Characteristics vs. Special Characteristics IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
S IATF 16949 Clause 8.3.3.3 - Documentation of all Special Characteristics in Drawings IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
M AS9110C Clause 8.5.1.2 Validation and Control of Special Processes for Repair Station AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
C AS9102 Form 2 Information - Special Processes - Plating AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
S Metal Radiographic and Ultrasonic Testing - Special Processes AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 11
M Special Characteristic - IATF Definition IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
W AS9100D Clause 8.5.1.2 Validation and Control of Special Processes AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 37
I Special 510k Imported Legacy Blogs 0
Marc A special Supermoon comes—but what causes it? 14 November 2016 Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 0
J Are Product Special Characteristic(s) Mandatory? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
Crimpshrine13 PFMEA Scope - Oversized Special Characteristic FMEA and Control Plans 4
Q US FDA UDI Compliance Question - Class II (Special Controls) Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 4
Q Special 510(k) or New Traditional - Currently Inactive Products Other US Medical Device Regulations 2
E Special 510(k) for software change Other US Medical Device Regulations 1
E 'Special' 510k as a Predicate Medical Device? Other US Medical Device Regulations 3

Similar threads

Top Bottom