Specificity in Weigh Scale Calibration Frequencies

H

horselady

#1
This is the first time I've used this forum so I hope I am entering the question in the appropriate area. If not, I apologize... My question is - when determining frequencies for weigh scale calibration due dates, is it sufficient to set a month and year (i.e. July 2006)? Is this acceptable for ISO9001? My gut feeling is that an actual date (July 15, 2006: ) should be designated. My Q.A. Manager feels otherwise. I work for a Foundry and the scales are used to weigh molds and cores to determine if they are weighing within the required range of acceptance.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Coury Ferguson

Moderator here to help
Staff member
Super Moderator
#2
This is the first time I've used this forum so I hope I am entering the question in the appropriate area. If not, I apologize... My question is - when determining frequencies for weigh scale calibration due dates, is it sufficient to set a month and year (i.e. July 2006)? Is this acceptable for ISO9001? My gut feeling is that an actual date (July 15, 2006:thanks: ) should be designated. My Q.A. Manager feels otherwise. I work for a Foundry and the scales are used to weigh molds and cores to determine if they are weighing within the required range of acceptance.

I moved this thread to this forum to help get better responses on your question.

In previous companies I worked for we preferred to only require Month and Year on the calibration dates. To eliminate the possibility of missing the "specific" date. It was easier to maintain the calibration records using month and year.
 

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
#3
This is the first time I've used this forum so I hope I am entering the question in the appropriate area. If not, I apologize... My question is - when determining frequencies for weigh scale calibration due dates, is it sufficient to set a month and year (i.e. July 2006)? Is this acceptable for ISO9001? My gut feeling is that an actual date (July 15, 2006:thanks: ) should be designated. My Q.A. Manager feels otherwise. I work for a Foundry and the scales are used to weigh molds and cores to determine if they are weighing within the required range of acceptance.
Welcome to the Cove. :bigwave: If you go to the main forums page and scroll down, you'll see a list of all of the different forums available. Just pick the appropriate one. In most cases, if there's one that's more appropriate than the one you choose, a moderator will move the post, which is what will happen here, I'm sure.

As to your question, you can specify a month rather than a specific date so long as what you do doesn't conflict with a customer requirement. You need to be careful, though, not to create conflicting requirements in your documentation. If you specify "12 months" as the mandated interval, it could be construed to mean that a specific anniversary date is the endpoint. Explain in your documentation that an interval endpoint expressed as 10/06 (October of 2006) means that the recalibration must be done before November 1 of 2006.
 
C

crendfrey

#4
Greetings and welcome Horselady,:bigwave:

I agree whole heartedly with the above posts.
I work for a calibration lab. We require our technicians to enter only the month and year of the due dates.
This eliminates a whole host of scheduling conflicts both for us and our customers. :bonk:
If we had a specific date to meet, we would eventually miss way too many calibrations.
It is the nature of the business. Every customer is important. Emergency service is also part of what we do. If you are out of business because your scale is down you go way up on the list. Sometimes regular calibrations at smoothly running customers simply must wait another 24 hours.
Our calibration agreements state monthly, bimonthly instead of 30 days or 60 days. This keeps everyone out of the proverbial box.
We DO however have a few customers (mostly TS16949) where we actually schedule a date and time for calibrations like a Dr. Appointment. This obviously comes with a fee.:D
Your accredited calibration house should be able to meet YOUR requirements, whatever they may be.
 
H

horselady

#5
Makes sense to me - thanks for the input. This is going to be great having a place to go with questions..
 

BradM

Staff member
Admin
#6
Hello!

This is a good question, and it comes up quite often. Basically, Jim's response is a good one.

I've had customers who have done month/day/year as the due date, and month/ year. Guess who had more equipment past due during audits?

But like Jim said, it it contingent on customer requirements and regulatory compliance. Some industries are a bit more picky than others.

Setting calibration frequency dates is an exercise in risk/return. The longer you go between calibration frequencies, the more work you may have to review should you have an out-of-calibration situation. How much risk can you accept?

If your equipment has never been calibrated, you may want to stick to a "shorter" time interval (I'll just throw out, say six months), until you find your equipment within tolerance, or stable. Then you can spread it out more (given that your requirements allow you to perform this.) Again, the interval will depend on the performance of the equipment, requirements, and the critical/non-critical nature of the process
 

RoxaneB

Super Moderator
Super Moderator
#7
We put month/year on our stickers after learning a hard lesson during an external audit.

Day 2 of a 3 day audit...we were in our second testing lab on day 2, having been in the first on Day 1...

Auditor : Oh look, this equipment was due yesterday.
QC Mgr : So it was.
Auditor : Why wasn't it done?
QC Mgr : Because you were here...I was with you.
Auditor : That's no excuse.

Never put day/month/year on the stickers since! :lol:
 
K

Ken K

#8
Personally, I don't agree with the answers given:notme:

Let's say, for discussion sake, the scale in question is scheduled for calibration each month. It's measurements are critical to the process.

So the following dates are listed on the calibration report:

01/03/06
02/28/06
03/02/06
04/28/06
05/07/06

On the 4/28 calibration the scale is found significantly out of tolerance. Instead of worrying about 30 days of nonconforming product, you now have 57 days to consider (7 day work week).

But your all saying thats fine because you just list the month/year and not a specific date and all your calibrations have a tolerance of +/- 30 days:confused:
 

BradM

Staff member
Admin
#9
Hey Ken,

Good question. Thanks for asking.

In your example above, all calibrations are being done monthly. You calibrate on 1/03, with 02/06 as the due date. It does not matter when in 02 you verify it. If it's critical, then perform it on 02/01/06. You really do not need to force your system by putting a 02/01/06 date on the sticker, do you?

If you're checking a weigh scale monthly and it's OOT, you have bigger problems than the date on the sticker. Something is wrong.

In essence, you are correct. There are other methods, though (including daily/weekly performance checks on the balance) to minimize the exposure. Adding a day/week/month date to the due date only creates more stress for those wishing to stay in compliance, with hundreds/thousands of intruments in their system.

Even with month/year on the sticker, you could check it twice, three times in the month. But you have only made a mandate to have it done by the end of the month.

Don't let your system trap you. Please post again if this does not address your concern.
 
K

Ken K

#10
In your example above, all calibrations are being done monthly. You calibrate on 1/03, with 02/06 as the due date. It does not matter when in 02 you verify it.

Brad, with all due respect, are you serious?

We have equipment calibrated by outside sources. When they are done with the calibrations, we require them to schedule the next calibration before they leave. Actually, Tinius Olsen does that on their own before they leave. The date of the calibration / next calibration is also on their stickers. In fact, it's on all our outside calibration labels.

Maybe I'm missing something here, but just the month listed would not be acceptable in our lab. A written nonconformance in the past and a lively discussion here led to an update in our calibration procedure.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
T Design Input detail & specificity ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
C Question regarding Quality Manual Content and Specificity ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
J Sensitivity vs. Specificity - FDA won't even allow those words ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
Q Weigh Scale Electronics - Suggested Storage Humidity and Temperature Manufacturing and Related Processes 7
Q Translating FDA Searches - Neonatal incubator weigh scales US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 5
B Procedures necessary for things such as the floor cleaner or weigh scale ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
S Is calibration of a weigh scale required? Calibration Frequency (Interval) 8
M Establishment of Acceptance Criteria for a Weigh Balance General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
Q 93/42/EEC Class I Medical Device Weigh Scale - Class A under EN 62304? IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 15
Q EN 60601-1 - Cable requirement low voltage DC - Medical weigh scale IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 6
R Calibration of Scales for Weigh Counting General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 19
J Should weigh count scales be in the Calibration System? QS-9000 - American Automotive Manufacturers Standard 4
D Limited Range Calibration - 5000 lb Industrial floor scale General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
supadrai Remote Opportunity - Large Scale Glove Factory QMS / RA / Legal Job Openings, Consulting and Employment Opportunities 0
A Attribute Analysis for colour matching scale Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 5
A Earth leakage current test for Permanently installed Large scale MEE IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 5
G APQP Scope and scale tool APQP and PPAP 2
G Glass scale calibration at 74 degrees F? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
N Heavy tare to simulate high load in a routine sensitivity test of a floor scale? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
G Does pitch/increment/resolution of a ruled scale apply to measurement uncertainty as line item? Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 10
WEAVER Electronic Weighing Scale Calibration Tolerance Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
dhuot1990 USP 41 Hanging Scale - Is it possible to make a hang scale adhere to USP41 Standards? ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
Q FDA 3500A Reports - Trip and Fall - Weight scale with a fold out platform Other US Medical Device Regulations 1
G Uncertainty of staging a short line scale standard on longer measuring machine? Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 4
A Does the scale for counting need Validation? Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 6
G Sample Size, Significant Figures, Scale General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
S IEC 60601-2-27: What does "linear within ±20% of the full scale output" mean? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 6
S Is a GR&R necessary for Weighing Scale? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 7
G Metal Scale (SIP-Societe Genevoise) change in size over time? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 8
M What is 'Loft' which is used in Boeing company to express 1/1 scale 2D drawing Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 2
M What is the criteria for "small-scale device" regarding CE marking? EU Medical Device Regulations 2
D Verification of weighing scale 150kg capacity 0.05g accuracy General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 9
J Digital Scale Re-Calibration Interval Frequency General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 10
N Definition of Large-Scale Fixed Installation per the RoHS2 Directive EU Medical Device Regulations 3
D Single-Point Scale Calibration - Very Large Scales General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
L Hardness Testing - Rockwell 15T Scale Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 1
S Steel Coil Scale Verification Resolution Calibration Frequency (Interval) 7
W Weighing Scale used in Phamaceutical Production - Daily Verification Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 8
A Scale Error Calculator wanted General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
K Where do I find Frequencies and Composite Scale in Minitab? Using Minitab Software 2
K Calibration Standards - Master weight having more tolerance than our gram scale General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
D What is a Ford Single Scale? Customer and Company Specific Requirements 2
K What does Data Logger Accuracy = ? 0.25% of Full scale ? 1 Digit Mean? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
K How to group 5 questions to be one variable for Likert Scale question Using Minitab Software 11
P Chemical Purity Testing - FMEA Severity Scale FMEA and Control Plans 2
I Connection of Secondary Circuits to Medical Weight Scale Enclosure IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
D Conductivity Meter Specification - What Is Accuracy +/- 1% Full Scale + 1 digit General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 15
S Count (Bolts and Nuts) Scale - Class of Calibration Weights Calibration and Metrology Software and Hardware 3
S Offline Laboratory Scale Gauges for Min Max Diameter of Round Steel Bars General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 6
K Preventing Shortage of Product Quantity - Hand Count and Scale Count Manufacturing and Related Processes 13

Similar threads

Top Bottom