Standards for determining calibration frequencies for gages

Elsmar Forum Sponsor

CarolX

Super Moderator
Super Moderator
#2
MK,

Nope. It is up to you to deterimine how often.

We calibrate standard measuring equipment (micrometer, caslipers, etc.) monthly. Everything else is yearly.

Regards,
CarolX
 

Jerry Eldred

Forum Moderator
Super Moderator
#3
There are a few options for setting calibration intervals.

1. Use manufacturer's recommended intervals (drawbacks: they don't all give you a recommended interval; you don't know for certain that it is adequate; it doesn't allow for equipment aging/variety of use conditions etc).

2. Set fixed intervals. Using some info from (1), and good "engineering intuition", set conservative fixed intervals (normally should be short enough to give a high confidence that the unit will maintain in-tolerance throughout the interval). This is convenient because you can create a somewhat predictable workload, and adjust for even workflow from month to month. This also has the same drawbacks as (1), that it doesn't account for variety of conditions, usages, equipment aging and user needs.

3. Set intervals statistically based on a percent probability (typically about 95%) that the instruments will remain in-tolerance for the length of the interval. This is done by evaluating prior calibration history of the cal'd units at a given interval. Measure the percent of them that were in-tolerance at that interval. If the percent in-tolerance falls within your defined in-tolerance confidence level, the interval remains the same. If too many of the units were in-tolerance, you are calibrating too often and so need to lengthen the interval. If too few of the units were in-tolerance, the interval needs to be shortened. Drawbacks are that it is more cumbersome to maintain. Our in-house database has a module programmed into it which automatically adjusts intervals so that all instruments in the program (about 12,000 units at our site) stay in-tolerance for the defined percentage confidence level. Advantages are that you optimize the best calibration interval length. This helps keep our operating cost at a minimum and our instruments at an acceptable confidence level that they will remain in-tolerance.

Problems with the statistical method are that it is more difficult to manage in a small lab (not enough population sometimes to make statistically significant evaluations). I used to run a small lab, and set up an interval analysis system on paper. I ran a report once a year and did interval analysis and adjustment once each year.

NCSL (National Conference Of Standards Laboratories) has a recommended practice for the establishment and adjustment of calibration intervals. That is probably one of the best practices on that topic. I believe their web address is ncsl-hq.org .

I will also not recommend a specific confidence level. That needs to be done locally to meet your particular company's needs.
 

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#4
Originally posted by JerryStem:

When we were going thru ISO Guide 25 accreditation by A2LA, I asked the program manager there about due dates.

Their opinion was to not even list one when certifying a customers equipment/standards.
True, true. You only calibrate it. You cannot determine it's use cycle unless you are part of the company.
 
J

JerryStem

#5
When we were going thru ISO Guide 25 accreditation by A2LA, I asked the program manager there about due dates.

Their opinion was to not even list one when certifying a customers equipment/standards. Since we weren't "guaranteeing" the calibration for 6 mo/1 yr/... they said why list one? (If I certified a foil for 6 months and the next day the customer rips it in half, obviously I can't say it's still the right thickness).

I know this is off topic slightly, but just wanted to give my 2 cents. They also went into cycle dates, saying they had no guideance for them either. You set your own but it had to be "reasonable". 10 years was a little long...

Jerry
 
D

Dan Larsen

#6
Extending on Jerry's point (3)...

The statistical approach is good if you have the time and resources. YOU set the calibration frequency, and the driving force, I think, is the requirement that you justify all prior results if you find a gage out of calibration. If you set the calibration frequency too close, you'll never have a situation to react to, but you may be spending too much on calibration. If you set the calibration frequency out too far, you'll likely have an out of calibration situation that will be difficult and time consuming to justify (and may have a recall situation as well). Look at the history of the gage, not just whether it's "OK" or "NOT OK", but the actual found values. Set the calibration frequency based on the expected drift of the gage, so that you calibrate befor it drifts to the point you have to react.

I suggest (for small companies with limited resources) that they start out with a high frequency, then evaluate the situation after three cal cycles. If the gage doesn't drift, extend the cal cycle. Repeat. When you see a change, recalibrate and hold the cycle. Monitor for three more cycles and see if it works for you. This may not be statistically accurate, but it works from a logical standpoint. And in my mind, statistics (properly applied) is nothing but logic!
 

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#7
Calibration Intervals

You might look at RP-1. If you have access to NASA Reference Publication 1342, you'll find this to be a useful source also.

RP-1 is currently under revision by the Calibration Interval Subcommittee of NCSLI's Metrology Practices Committee, but the current edition is pretty up to date. The software that comes with RP-1 applies a statistical decision algorithm that is useful for items with sparse service history data. The software has been updated and is available at www.isgmax.com.

Also see http://Elsmar.com/Forums/showthread.php?t=927
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
B Standards Needed In House - Determining what standards are applicable Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 3
D Imaging/Image Quality Standards Other Medical Device Related Standards 0
R ECG Risk Analysis Standards ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 2
I Management review in conformity assessment standards - Certification Bodies Management Review Meetings and related Processes 6
Govind Informational ISO COVID-19 response: freely available ISO standards Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 1
C Does a CE mark infer meeting all applicable standards? CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 1
T Assessing Hazard-Related Use Scenarios where control measures exist through standards IEC 62366 - Medical Device Usability Engineering 14
Richard Regalado Informational ISO makes available relevant BCMS standards free for online access Business Continuity & Resiliency Planning (BCRP) 5
A Technical File - Updating Applied Standards EU Medical Device Regulations 4
A NB (Notified Body) Audit of Standards ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
R Applicability of new non-harmonized standards (MDD/MDR) EU Medical Device Regulations 8
dgrainger Informational EU published new Harmonised Standards List for the Directives (25/3/2020) Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
P Static Electricity/Pacemaker - Standards for static electricity generation CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 3
M Referencing Harmonised Standards in Declarations of Conformity EU Medical Device Regulations 4
Pmarszal External Standards and Regulations Management Process Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 10
S IVF medical devices standards and test methods Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 4
M What are the standards for malls management? ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 1
A Complaint alert levels - Industry standards pertaining to alert levels for complaints Customer Complaints 5
R MDR standards - which standards to comply with ? EU Medical Device Regulations 3
D Why does Official Journal list superseded standards? EU Medical Device Regulations 6
M MDR "Common Specifications" (CS) - If not standards, then what? EU Medical Device Regulations 3
L In house calibration - Our CMM's are outside certified can I use them to certify our standards General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
F AS9100D, raw material standards are a requirement for manufacturing? AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 5
S Industry Labelling Standards - non medical Manufacturing and Related Processes 0
J Medical device related standards or regulations - Disposed records log ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
S How many mandays required for the below mentioned standards IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 3
M Standards Subscription Service and Standards Tracking Service Pros and Cons? Other US Medical Device Regulations 3
P European versions of standards - ISO 10993-1 and ISO 11607-1 EU Medical Device Regulations 6
Q Interpreting China Medical Device regulations/standards China Medical Device Regulations 1
M Informational US FDA – Modifications to the List of Recognized Standards, Recognition List Number: 052 Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M EMC Directive and product safety standards CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 1
M Referenced Standards and/or "State of the Art"? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 4
Sidney Vianna Informational List of ISO Management System Standards Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 0
C How medical device manufacturers are implementing standards like GDPR and HIPAA Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 5
R Rationale for changes to ISO Standards Other Medical Device Related Standards 4
D IEC EN 61326 Dated Standards - Dated standards for test protocols CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 3
M Microbiological Testing Lab - Layout & Standards Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
M Different procedure templates for different standards - We have two different management systems ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
DuncanGibbons Are there aerospace standards for the development and manufacture of euipment and tools? AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 3
W ISO standards /Social Audit Franchise (Accredited & Non Accredited) Service Industry Specific Topics 6
S How to consider the relevant standards during development of ISO13482:2016 for IVD manufacturing Blood grouping Other Medical Device Related Standards 6
S Standards for real time stability for medical devices Other Medical Device Related Standards 2
S Mammography standards or regulations for radiology software (no hardware)? Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 0
E Standards Management Tool Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 1
DuncanGibbons To what extent are NASA standards applicable to commercial aviation? AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 14
A MDRS Standards Harmonisation - copy of ISO 15223-1 EU Medical Device Regulations 3
K Verifying gas tight glass syringe used for making standards General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
L Getting Notice of Revision and Accessing Public Draft Copies of ISO Standards Service Industry Specific Topics 2
A Timeline for harmonised standards to be published under MDR CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 5
M EU Harmonized Standards - Withdrawals and Replacements EU Medical Device Regulations 14
Similar threads


















































Top Bottom