Standards for determining calibration frequencies for gages

Elsmar Forum Sponsor

CarolX

Trusted Information Resource
#2
MK,

Nope. It is up to you to deterimine how often.

We calibrate standard measuring equipment (micrometer, caslipers, etc.) monthly. Everything else is yearly.

Regards,
CarolX
 

Jerry Eldred

Forum Moderator
Super Moderator
#3
There are a few options for setting calibration intervals.

1. Use manufacturer's recommended intervals (drawbacks: they don't all give you a recommended interval; you don't know for certain that it is adequate; it doesn't allow for equipment aging/variety of use conditions etc).

2. Set fixed intervals. Using some info from (1), and good "engineering intuition", set conservative fixed intervals (normally should be short enough to give a high confidence that the unit will maintain in-tolerance throughout the interval). This is convenient because you can create a somewhat predictable workload, and adjust for even workflow from month to month. This also has the same drawbacks as (1), that it doesn't account for variety of conditions, usages, equipment aging and user needs.

3. Set intervals statistically based on a percent probability (typically about 95%) that the instruments will remain in-tolerance for the length of the interval. This is done by evaluating prior calibration history of the cal'd units at a given interval. Measure the percent of them that were in-tolerance at that interval. If the percent in-tolerance falls within your defined in-tolerance confidence level, the interval remains the same. If too many of the units were in-tolerance, you are calibrating too often and so need to lengthen the interval. If too few of the units were in-tolerance, the interval needs to be shortened. Drawbacks are that it is more cumbersome to maintain. Our in-house database has a module programmed into it which automatically adjusts intervals so that all instruments in the program (about 12,000 units at our site) stay in-tolerance for the defined percentage confidence level. Advantages are that you optimize the best calibration interval length. This helps keep our operating cost at a minimum and our instruments at an acceptable confidence level that they will remain in-tolerance.

Problems with the statistical method are that it is more difficult to manage in a small lab (not enough population sometimes to make statistically significant evaluations). I used to run a small lab, and set up an interval analysis system on paper. I ran a report once a year and did interval analysis and adjustment once each year.

NCSL (National Conference Of Standards Laboratories) has a recommended practice for the establishment and adjustment of calibration intervals. That is probably one of the best practices on that topic. I believe their web address is ncsl-hq.org .

I will also not recommend a specific confidence level. That needs to be done locally to meet your particular company's needs.
 

Marc

Fully vaccinated are you?
Leader
Admin
#4
Originally posted by JerryStem:

When we were going thru ISO Guide 25 accreditation by A2LA, I asked the program manager there about due dates.

Their opinion was to not even list one when certifying a customers equipment/standards.
True, true. You only calibrate it. You cannot determine it's use cycle unless you are part of the company.
 
J

JerryStem

#5
When we were going thru ISO Guide 25 accreditation by A2LA, I asked the program manager there about due dates.

Their opinion was to not even list one when certifying a customers equipment/standards. Since we weren't "guaranteeing" the calibration for 6 mo/1 yr/... they said why list one? (If I certified a foil for 6 months and the next day the customer rips it in half, obviously I can't say it's still the right thickness).

I know this is off topic slightly, but just wanted to give my 2 cents. They also went into cycle dates, saying they had no guideance for them either. You set your own but it had to be "reasonable". 10 years was a little long...

Jerry
 
D

Dan Larsen

#6
Extending on Jerry's point (3)...

The statistical approach is good if you have the time and resources. YOU set the calibration frequency, and the driving force, I think, is the requirement that you justify all prior results if you find a gage out of calibration. If you set the calibration frequency too close, you'll never have a situation to react to, but you may be spending too much on calibration. If you set the calibration frequency out too far, you'll likely have an out of calibration situation that will be difficult and time consuming to justify (and may have a recall situation as well). Look at the history of the gage, not just whether it's "OK" or "NOT OK", but the actual found values. Set the calibration frequency based on the expected drift of the gage, so that you calibrate befor it drifts to the point you have to react.

I suggest (for small companies with limited resources) that they start out with a high frequency, then evaluate the situation after three cal cycles. If the gage doesn't drift, extend the cal cycle. Repeat. When you see a change, recalibrate and hold the cycle. Monitor for three more cycles and see if it works for you. This may not be statistically accurate, but it works from a logical standpoint. And in my mind, statistics (properly applied) is nothing but logic!
 

Marc

Fully vaccinated are you?
Leader
Admin
#7
Calibration Intervals

You might look at RP-1. If you have access to NASA Reference Publication 1342, you'll find this to be a useful source also.

RP-1 is currently under revision by the Calibration Interval Subcommittee of NCSLI's Metrology Practices Committee, but the current edition is pretty up to date. The software that comes with RP-1 applies a statistical decision algorithm that is useful for items with sparse service history data. The software has been updated and is available at www.isgmax.com.

Also see http://Elsmar.com/Forums/showthread.php?t=927
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
B Standards Needed In House - Determining what standards are applicable Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 3
A Common Specifications versus Harmonized Standards EU Medical Device Regulations 3
Sidney Vianna IAQG News Designation of aerospace standards to be modified - from AS91X0 (in the Americas) to IA91X0 (International Aerospace) AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 0
T Justification of use of non-harmonized standards for MDR conformity Other Medical Device Related Standards 12
I Hold Time studies for Primary Reference standards Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 0
G How to find applicable standards for a new product? EU Medical Device Regulations 3
A How to find Info about updated Standards EU Medical Device Regulations 2
C Producing to Inactive ASTM and IEC Standards Manufacturing and Related Processes 10
Sidney Vianna Informational Changes to Terms and Definitions in ISO/TC 176 Standards since ISO 9000:2015 was issued. ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 0
A How to monitor new versions of external standards in your business Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 2
Ajit Basrur Any standards relating to ESG requirements? ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 1
H Regarding confusion of the validity of the European implementation of IEC standards Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
shimonv FDA-recognized Standards US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 0
C By when should harmonized standards be complied with? EU Medical Device Regulations 5
C Deadline for compliance with added MDR harmonized standards CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 2
Ed Panek MDR Harmonized Standards Updated EU Medical Device Regulations 4
B Calibration of Thread Gages with Metric Standards with Conversion to Imperial Units General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
E Sources of every single paragraph of the ISO 9001 standards? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
E Do I need test reports for all standards mentioned in my 510k application? Other Medical Device Related Standards 8
Q Harmonised Standards (EN ISO 13485 / EN ISO 14971) in MDR (2017/745/EU) ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
placebo_master How to comprehend the paragraph architecture of OSHA standards in 1910 Subpart S Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 6
K MHLW MO169 2021 Japan Ministerial Ordinance on Standards for Manufacturing Control and Quality Control for Medical Devices and In-Vitro Diagnostics Japan Medical Device Regulations 2
M Periodically verifying revision levels of published standards Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 4
S Which ISO Standards to Purchase - EN ISO and/or ISO Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
D Customer requirements on specific standards Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 6
M Does 4.5 - Alternative RISK CONTROL apply to the Particular Standards? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
N How to validate Regulations and Standards? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 12
E Comparison of Personal Protective Equipment Standards EN 14605 vs GB24539 and ISO 13982 vs GB 24539 Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 0
E Comparison of Respiratory Protective Equipment Standards (China Standard Compare with EU standard of EN149 Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 2
Watchcat REGULATORY WATCHCAT - De Novo Proposed Rule - Special Controls and Standards Other US Medical Device Regulations 0
A Industry Standards for Cosmetic Inspection Criteria Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 1
G How to record Regulations and Standards as Design Inputs? Design and Development of Products and Processes 15
Ed Panek External Standards List - Should this document include previously revised standards? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
S MDR GSPR Standards EU Medical Device Regulations 1
S Class 1 and 2 changes in CM standards (aerospace industry) Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 0
S 316 Stainless Steel Standards Other Medical Device Related Standards 3
U Is there any website out there that summarizes all relevant standards? Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
M Packaging standards - ASTM vs ISTA Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
M Label Making & Printing Standards ISO / ASTM ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
M Why are EU harmonized particular standards so old & out-of-date? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 11
R Weld Penetration Standards and Requirements Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
S Any ISO standards around Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning? Medical Information Technology, Medical Software and Health Informatics 4
M ERP / QMS related software standards for Validation IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 6
M MDR harmonized standards EU Medical Device Regulations 7
S Where do l get calibration standards to run a calibration lab? Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 2
C Appendix Z in Harmonised Standards? EU Medical Device Regulations 15
Ajit Basrur Corporate management standards ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
Revision36 Engineering Change Order Industry Standards Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 7
R Applicable ISO standards - packaging and others Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 4
Q Standards for Shipping by Sea US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2

Similar threads

Top Bottom