It's difficult to know what the expectation is here, I guess case history will develop as more companies are audited against the MDR. Our procedure covers responsibilities, device classification, essential requirements, conformity assessment route, QMS, changes, hosting audits, compliance with standards, suppliers, economic actors, vigilance, PMS and EU Rep. Not in any detail as most of these have their own procedures, I just threw in anything that had a 'regulatory compliance' element. It seems to me that they are trying to crack down on the rogues who don't have anyone or anything in place to ensure they are compliant, so a procedure that covers who does what will hopefully suffice. Of course, a procedure is just a procedure and needs to be backed up by actual regulatory compliance.