Shigeo Shingo case studies often begin with the statement that "worker vigilance" was used to prevent errors. You could then be 100% sure errors were occurring because administrative controls are rarely 100% effective in preventing trouble regardless of how vigilant people try to be. Engineering controls (poka yoke) that make the trouble impossible will however work. From what I see of the AIAG's new
FMEA manual, error proofing is the ONLY way to earn a 1 detection or occurrence rating. In fact, for process occurrence ratings, the preventive controls must not only be present, they must be "extremely effective" and the failure mode "...cannot be physically produced due to the failure cause."
From what I see of the Detection ratings, the detection control must ALWAYS detect the failure mode or failure cause (and prevent its escape) to earn a 1 rating.
I wonder if there is a way to error-proof the pin issue. I am not a mechanical engineer so I cannot give engineering advice but Shingo covers all kinds of applications of this nature. Can the parts be redesigned, and/or a jig or fixture added to the process, that forces the parts to align properly?