Struggling with ISO 13485:2016 Clause 6.2 - Level of Risk Associated with Work

tebusse

Involved In Discussions
#1
All,

I know this clause has been discussed, however, I think I'm getting a little wrapped around the axle with how to implement the requirements.


The company for which I work is a team of 8 with 3 people manufacturing and the remainder doing operations (excluding me with QA/RA), therefore, I want to keep this procedure manageable and simple.

However, I'm stuck with level of risk associated with work not being done properly and demonstrating competency regarding the different levels of risk. Does the risk level have to be defined for each training task (this would be cumbersome)? Or, can the procedure be more generalized with an overview of high or low risk? For example, training for technical procedures is high risk and (e.g. laboratory processes, shipping of product, etc.) shall consist of trainee observation of processes and demonstration of processes under the supervision of a qualified trainer. Once the trainer finds the trainee competent, the trainee is signed off for that process.

For low risk, non-technical procedures, the training platform may be a read/understand, discussion, presentation.

Any assistance would be most helpful.

Tonia
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

yodon

Leader
Super Moderator
#2
Without intending to wax philosophical, I think it's important to consider how 13485:2016 addresses risk:

When the term “risk” is used, the application of the term within the scope of this International Standard pertains to safety or performance requirements of the medical device or meeting applicable regulatory requirements.

So when assessing effectiveness of training (or other action!), the methodology should be based on the risk (per the above) of that individual failing to properly perform that function.

So the point is that I don't know if equating all "technical procedures" to high risk is appropriate. There are some functions that, if not performed correctly, would either be caught immediately or pose no real risk (per the context above).

Further, for truly high-risk functions, maybe a one-time observation is not sufficient. Is there any follow-up to ensure no regression? I know of one company that has the supervisor observe each operator doing "high risk" functions during the course of the week to ensure comprehension / competence. Maybe that's too much for your organization but is just intended to show that it's a journey sometimes.

Without knowing your business or the risks (per above), it's hard to say if the system you proposed is sufficient to check effectiveness. It may well be.
 

Jean_B

Trusted Information Resource
#3
Considering the increased alignment between the 2016 edition of the 13485 standard and the lack of change from the previous standards for this clause, some implicit meaning could perhaps be gleamed from interpreting the FDA QSR personnel clause (21 CFR 820.25).

Personnel (especially, but not limited to manufacturing alone) needs to be aware which defects may occur from their improper performance. (From 21 CFR 820.25, (1))

Furthermore, personnel performing verification and validation need to be aware both of what defects, and what errors, they may encounter in their tasks. (From 21 CFR 820.25, (2))
To my mind this applies to knowing what to check for (defect) and what can result in false positives/negatives in checking (errors).

It might be best if someone else confirms whether this interpretation holds for the 13485 in all regions.

21 CFR 820.25 extract:
...
(1) As part of their training, personnel shall be made aware of device defects which may occur from the improper performance of their specific jobs.
(2) Personnel who perform verification and validation activities shall be made aware of defects and errors that may be encountered as part of their job functions.
The pertinent parts for risk then seem to be linked to process risk management (possibly through PFMEA/Control plans) on critical aspects of the product (usually determined in the risk management of the design phase, and updated through post-market surveillance).
 
N

ninacborges

#4
Tonia,

Did you ever come up with a solution? I'm assuming you've already changed the Employee Training SOP to reflect the ISO 13485:2016 modifications.

I researched some of the same issues you were discussing, and want to make this the least burdensome as possible. Should I implement a training matrix, with a grading system of risk levels associated with the training module? This seems tedious.....
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
B Struggling with using the 5.6 version Ford Capacity Analysis Report APQP and PPAP 5
F Struggling with a root cause analysis - Customer Returns - Escape issue Problem Solving, Root Cause Fault and Failure Analysis 15
Proud Liberal Struggling w/ GR&R on ID Spline Runout Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 0
I Struggling with Training and Competence ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 10
S Struggling with definition of Initial Importer and First Title 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
B Struggling With Writing PA (Preventive Action) Procedure Preventive Action and Continuous Improvement 11
M A newbie to RM struggling with the policy ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 1
S Are you struggling with your IEC 60601-1 3rd edition testing lab? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 16
K Struggling with the Gap Analysis Documentation for IEC 60601 IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
A Struggling with Process and Sub-Process Validation - Brain Catheter Design and Development of Products and Processes 2
L Struggling with Writing Effective Root Cause Statements Problem Solving, Root Cause Fault and Failure Analysis 13
B Quality Planning process map - Struggling to define all the inputs and outputs Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 17
M ASME NQA-1-1994 Standards - Struggling with the supplement references Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 16
C Struggling to teach a co-worker how to read dial calipers, any advice? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 13
K Repetitive Nonconformance (Struggling with Corrective Action Tools) - Need Help! Nonconformance and Corrective Action 14
K Struggling with keeping part-time internal auditors in our program Internal Auditing 15
H Still Struggling.... Control chart practice problems for the CQT Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 3
A ISO 80601-2-30 - the rated range of cuff pressure in the IFU Other Medical Device Related Standards 0
V ISO 17025 Accreditation Consulting Needed ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
S ISO 13485 certification training Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 1
B New to ISO 14971. Comparing to MIL-STD-882 ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 7
Sidney Vianna Informational ISO Net Zero Guidelines - Free Download Sustainability, Green Initiatives and Ecology 4
Sidney Vianna Tesla Lacks Major Automotive Quality Certifications such as IATF 16949 and ISO 9001 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 15
D Is Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) Required in ISO 17025? ISO 17025 related Discussions 4
Ed Panek ISO 13485 Reporting Requirements ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
Cats Clause ISO 9001 - verification of Tape Measures and Steel rules ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 33
W Looking for IATF 16949 (and ISO 17025) QMS software Suggestions Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 8
Doninina Risk management file according MDR or ISO 14971:P2019 ? EU Medical Device Regulations 2
B Multisite Certification Requirements for ISO 27001 IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 8
D ISO 27001:2022 Harmonisation Timeline IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 3
R Process Maps for ISO 17025 ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
S ISO 9001 Quality Management System and its processes ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 16
K Becoming a Trainer for ISO/AS Lead Auditor and AATT Courses Professional Certifications and Degrees 2
M Preservation of Raw Materials in ISO 9001:2015 Standard ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
B ISO 13485 Qualification of R&D Equipment Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 1
J Recognised/reputable courses for ISO 13485 Section 7.3 (Design & Development)? Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 1
S ISO 14001 Operational Planning and Control - Proving evidence of communicating environmental requirements to suppliers ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
L Assignment on the link between Quality Gurus & ISO 9001:2015 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
jeancloude17 Advice for ISO 9001 for software Design and Development of Products and Processes 2
J Properly referencing ISO standards ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 66
Q ISO 13485 certificate needed if I go for MDSAP certification? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
Sidney Vianna Informational ISO/TS 10020:2022 Quality management systems — Organizational change management — Processes Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 0
Ed Panek ISO 9001 Cert Scope Adjustment ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 11
P ISO 9001: Quality Management as a process ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 14
K ISO 2859-5 (single run production) control plan issues FMEA and Control Plans 2
K ISO 17025 Method Validation and Verification for Test Lab ISO 17025 related Discussions 4
K ISO 13485 Design Requirement with respect to "component" manufacturers ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 11
P Registrar Cancelled ISO 13485 Auditors multiple times? Registrars and Notified Bodies 1
rob3027 ISO 13485 justification for design and development exclusion for medical packaging ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 18
A Help understanding what it takes to implement a QMS that is ISO 13485 compliant ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4

Similar threads

Top Bottom