Struggling with ISO 13485:2016 Clause 6.2 - Level of Risk Associated with Work

tebusse

Involved In Discussions
#1
All,

I know this clause has been discussed, however, I think I'm getting a little wrapped around the axle with how to implement the requirements.


The company for which I work is a team of 8 with 3 people manufacturing and the remainder doing operations (excluding me with QA/RA), therefore, I want to keep this procedure manageable and simple.

However, I'm stuck with level of risk associated with work not being done properly and demonstrating competency regarding the different levels of risk. Does the risk level have to be defined for each training task (this would be cumbersome)? Or, can the procedure be more generalized with an overview of high or low risk? For example, training for technical procedures is high risk and (e.g. laboratory processes, shipping of product, etc.) shall consist of trainee observation of processes and demonstration of processes under the supervision of a qualified trainer. Once the trainer finds the trainee competent, the trainee is signed off for that process.

For low risk, non-technical procedures, the training platform may be a read/understand, discussion, presentation.

Any assistance would be most helpful.

Tonia
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

yodon

Staff member
Super Moderator
#2
Without intending to wax philosophical, I think it's important to consider how 13485:2016 addresses risk:

When the term “risk” is used, the application of the term within the scope of this International Standard pertains to safety or performance requirements of the medical device or meeting applicable regulatory requirements.

So when assessing effectiveness of training (or other action!), the methodology should be based on the risk (per the above) of that individual failing to properly perform that function.

So the point is that I don't know if equating all "technical procedures" to high risk is appropriate. There are some functions that, if not performed correctly, would either be caught immediately or pose no real risk (per the context above).

Further, for truly high-risk functions, maybe a one-time observation is not sufficient. Is there any follow-up to ensure no regression? I know of one company that has the supervisor observe each operator doing "high risk" functions during the course of the week to ensure comprehension / competence. Maybe that's too much for your organization but is just intended to show that it's a journey sometimes.

Without knowing your business or the risks (per above), it's hard to say if the system you proposed is sufficient to check effectiveness. It may well be.
 

Jean_B

Trusted Information Resource
#3
Considering the increased alignment between the 2016 edition of the 13485 standard and the lack of change from the previous standards for this clause, some implicit meaning could perhaps be gleamed from interpreting the FDA QSR personnel clause (21 CFR 820.25).

Personnel (especially, but not limited to manufacturing alone) needs to be aware which defects may occur from their improper performance. (From 21 CFR 820.25, (1))

Furthermore, personnel performing verification and validation need to be aware both of what defects, and what errors, they may encounter in their tasks. (From 21 CFR 820.25, (2))
To my mind this applies to knowing what to check for (defect) and what can result in false positives/negatives in checking (errors).

It might be best if someone else confirms whether this interpretation holds for the 13485 in all regions.

21 CFR 820.25 extract:
...
(1) As part of their training, personnel shall be made aware of device defects which may occur from the improper performance of their specific jobs.
(2) Personnel who perform verification and validation activities shall be made aware of defects and errors that may be encountered as part of their job functions.
The pertinent parts for risk then seem to be linked to process risk management (possibly through PFMEA/Control plans) on critical aspects of the product (usually determined in the risk management of the design phase, and updated through post-market surveillance).
 
N

ninacborges

#4
Tonia,

Did you ever come up with a solution? I'm assuming you've already changed the Employee Training SOP to reflect the ISO 13485:2016 modifications.

I researched some of the same issues you were discussing, and want to make this the least burdensome as possible. Should I implement a training matrix, with a grading system of risk levels associated with the training module? This seems tedious.....
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
B Struggling with using the 5.6 version Ford Capacity Analysis Report APQP and PPAP 5
F Struggling with a root cause analysis - Customer Returns - Escape issue Problem Solving, Root Cause Fault and Failure Analysis 15
Proud Liberal Struggling w/ GR&R on ID Spline Runout Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 0
I Struggling with Training and Competence ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 10
S Struggling with definition of Initial Importer and First Title 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
B Struggling With Writing PA (Preventive Action) Procedure Preventive Action and Continuous Improvement 11
M A newbie to RM struggling with the policy ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 1
S Are you struggling with your IEC 60601-1 3rd edition testing lab? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 16
K Struggling with the Gap Analysis Documentation for IEC 60601 IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
A Struggling with Process and Sub-Process Validation - Brain Catheter Design and Development of Products and Processes 2
L Struggling with Writing Effective Root Cause Statements Problem Solving, Root Cause Fault and Failure Analysis 13
B Quality Planning process map - Struggling to define all the inputs and outputs Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 17
M ASME NQA-1-1994 Standards - Struggling with the supplement references Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 16
C Struggling to teach a co-worker how to read dial calipers, any advice? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 13
K Repetitive Nonconformance (Struggling with Corrective Action Tools) - Need Help! Nonconformance and Corrective Action 14
K Struggling with keeping part-time internal auditors in our program Internal Auditing 15
H Still Struggling.... Control chart practice problems for the CQT Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 3
K 3rd party auditor for ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 0
Edward Reesor ISO 19223 Discussion (Help) Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
chris1price MDSAP and ISO 13485 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
D ISO 13485 Contained NC ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
K Compliance Obligations 6.1.3 of ISO 14001 ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 3
V EN ISO 10993-1, Category of surface device by nature of body contact Other Medical Device Related Standards 2
I Does BSI require suppliers to be ISO 9001 Certified? EU Medical Device Regulations 12
Ron Rompen ISO 9001 Sanctioned Interpretations and FAQs ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
Ashland78 Need IATF 16949 ISO Gap Analysis Excel File Internal Auditing 3
Brizilla ISO 13485 for a Distributor ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
E Organisational Chart-ISO 17025 Laboratory ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
S Do ISO certs require an Apostille? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 14
Q Harmonised Standards (EN ISO 13485 / EN ISO 14971) in MDR (2017/745/EU) ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
Sidney Vianna Informational ISO/CD 7101 Health Care Quality Management System Standard Hospitals, Clinics & other Health Care Providers 0
Fjalar ISO 20417:2021: Technical Data (6.6.4 c) Other Medical Device Related Standards 0
D Automotive Customer asking for ISO 14001 Certification from suppliers ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 3
K Need Help With Auditing Suppliers Against ISO 9001 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 50
L PFMEA for test procedures (ISO 14971) ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 5
J ISO 13485- 8.3.1 Non-conforming material high volume ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
Q ISO 20417:2021- Regulatory Identification Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 2
L ISO/IEC 20000-6 Technical Areas IT (Information Technology) Service Management 0
R What are the new changes in EN ISO 11137-1:2015+A2:2019? Other Medical Device Related Standards 2
Y ISO 10993-14:2001 - Gel implants stored in glass syringes Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
eldercare Multi-Site ISO/AS Certification Requirement for some sites ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 22
Sidney Vianna ISO 14001 News ISO 14001 Continual Improvement Survey ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 0
Casana ISO 17025 - Contractor certification? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
B Sanctioned interpretation #10 - ISO 17025 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
H Contract Manufacturer as Design Owner ISO 13485 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
G Compliance with ISO 9001-2015 for ISO 17025 Accredited Labs? ISO 17025 related Discussions 5
blackholequasar ISO 13485 certification prior to Medical Device Manufacturing... worth it? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
C ISO 14001 Internal Audit - Opportunity for Improvement ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 2
P ISO 11607-2 Process Specification Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
S Which ISO Standards to Purchase - EN ISO and/or ISO Other Medical Device Related Standards 1

Similar threads

Top Bottom