Struggling with Training and Competence

I

iowamech

#1
First post everyone, bear with me.

~5 months ago, I came into a small organization that is already certified to ISO 9001:2008. In reviewing their documentation against the standard, I identified a gap with respect to training and competency. I've now gotten myself wrapped around the axel on the standard's wording.

6.2.1 "Personnel...shall be competent..."
6.2.2b "...provide training...to achieve the necessary competence."

Few questions:
1. Is it ok or not ok for someone to not be competent when compared against the competency requirements I've defined (e.g. job description and process based on the job training checklists)?

Elaboration: 6.2.1 says they have to be competent, 6.2.2b says well, if they're not competent, get them competent. I feel like these conflict. What if an auditor comes in and sees that employee xyz is required to be competent in executing the change order process, but the supervisor has indicated they are not competent (mistakes, etc.). Will we get written up for violation to 6.2.1 or if I indicate that I am providing additional training, or that person just needs more experience doing that job, that I am working to get them to the necessary competence level like 6.2.2b says. (I told you I'm wrapped around the axel).
2. Do we need to document when competence reviews take place (e.g. annually)?
3. Is it important to maintain both the initial training / competency achievement date and competence review dates?

I would love to see anyone's examples of training matrices, training records, etc.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

qusys

Trusted Information Resource
#2
First post everyone, bear with me.

~5 months ago, I came into a small organization that is already certified to ISO 9001:2008. In reviewing their documentation against the standard, I identified a gap with respect to training and competency. I've now gotten myself wrapped around the axel on the standard's wording.

6.2.1 "Personnel...shall be competent..."
6.2.2b "...provide training...to achieve the necessary competence."

Few questions:
1. Is it ok or not ok for someone to not be competent when compared against the competency requirements I've defined (e.g. job description and process based on the job training checklists)?

Elaboration: 6.2.1 says they have to be competent, 6.2.2b says well, if they're not competent, get them competent. I feel like these conflict. What if an auditor comes in and sees that employee xyz is required to be competent in executing the change order process, but the supervisor has indicated they are not competent (mistakes, etc.). Will we get written up for violation to 6.2.1 or if I indicate that I am providing additional training, or that person just needs more experience doing that job, that I am working to get them to the necessary competence level like 6.2.2b says. (I told you I'm wrapped around the axel).
2. Do we need to document when competence reviews take place (e.g. annually)?
3. Is it important to maintain both the initial training / competency achievement date and competence review dates?

I would love to see anyone's examples of training matrices, training records, etc.
ISO9001 standard has also a requirement on the verification of the effectiveness of the training. Said that, a non conformance could be elicited in that sense if there is the evidence that you described.
You should also investigated if there are records and evidence for the training and/or experience of the personnel in the organization based upon their job as well as they are aware of how they contribute to the quality system management in place.
 

John Broomfield

Leader
Super Moderator
#3
First post everyone, bear with me.

~5 months ago, I came into a small organization that is already certified to ISO 9001:2008. In reviewing their documentation against the standard, I identified a gap with respect to training and competency. I've now gotten myself wrapped around the axel on the standard's wording.

6.2.1 "Personnel...shall be competent..."
6.2.2b "...provide training...to achieve the necessary competence."

Few questions:
1. Is it ok or not ok for someone to not be competent when compared against the competency requirements I've defined (e.g. job description and process based on the job training checklists)?

Elaboration: 6.2.1 says they have to be competent, 6.2.2b says well, if they're not competent, get them competent. I feel like these conflict. What if an auditor comes in and sees that employee xyz is required to be competent in executing the change order process, but the supervisor has indicated they are not competent (mistakes, etc.). Will we get written up for violation to 6.2.1 or if I indicate that I am providing additional training, or that person just needs more experience doing that job, that I am working to get them to the necessary competence level like 6.2.2b says. (I told you I'm wrapped around the axel).
2. Do we need to document when competence reviews take place (e.g. annually)?
3. Is it important to maintain both the initial training / competency achievement date and competence review dates?

I would love to see anyone's examples of training matrices, training records, etc.
iowamech,

Remember that competence may not be the result of training. The training may be okay but the students were badly selected!

Also you may choose to subcontract to a supplier the fulfills your selection criteria. Your recruiting, or staff selection, process is key especially with respect to the required behaviors so employees have the potential to become competent.

Managers should have the competence to specify the behaviors, skills and knowledge necessary for their team members to do their jobs well and they, or the coach, should be able to verify competence of their employees, perhaps through monitoring processes (see 8.2.3) before they work alone.

Perhaps they do, perhaps they don't but you have to find out how your organization obtains competent people.

Spend some time with your owners of your recruiting and training processes to find out how these processes actually work in delivering competent people.

Then see what gaps you have according to the nature of your business. You may then need to spend time with those who obtain competent people via your purchasing or outsourcing processes.

This is much more productive than trying to write your procedures around clauses in the standard. In fact, imposing such procedures, and ignoring the existing the actual processes, can be disrespectful and counterproductive.

John
 

Randy

Super Moderator
#4
You skipped some of the most important words and the most underlooked and followed....

"...where applicable, provide training or take other actions to achieve the necessary competence..."

You determine applicability and you determine other actions other than training


There is no absolute requirement for anybody to get any training whatsoever
 
I

iowamech

#5
You skipped some of the most important words and the most underlooked and followed....

"...where applicable, provide training or take other actions to achieve the necessary competence..."

You determine applicability and you determine other actions other than training


There is no absolute requirement for anybody to get any training whatsoever
I understand that training is not the only way to get competence. The heart of the question surrounds evaluation of competence and how / if to document it.
 

John Broomfield

Leader
Super Moderator
#6
I understand that training is not the only way to get competence. The heart of the question surrounds evaluation of competence and how / if to document it.
iowamech,

All you need is to do is ask supervisors/managers how they ensure their employees are competent before leaving them to work alone.

For special processes (see 7.5.2) expect a detailed record of verifications against the specified abilities, skills and knowledge.

The degree of control (specification, verification and record keeping) may vary according to the impact of individual competence on the quality of your organization's services and products.

John
 
#7
Some quick notes. Fit them in where they belong.

Keep employees from performing things that are beyond their competency level. Even an entry level person has some level of competency and more can be learned in a variety of ways, including working with a mentor or other on-the-job training. expand their duties as they demonstrate their ability to perform.

Verification of competency can be determined in a variety of ways. Testing, interview, observation of how they are performing, and so on. Another way, often missed by evaluators, is by monitoring the processes they are involved with by tracking your quality objectives/KPI. If you introduce someone new into a group, and the KPI trend doesn't drop, that's a strong indication of their competency. Ideally this would be used along with other methods, but it does provide additional validation.
 

Paul Simpson

Trusted Information Resource
#8
It's important to remember that provision of competent people is a process. The absolute requirement is that people are competent. The process is you have to a) define what makes a person competent, b) evaluate each person.

Now comes the conditional bit: if you determine they are not currently competent (for example a new starter) you then have to make arrangements to deal with the need for competence: extra experience, training, mentoring.

Until the time they are competent you need to do extra while they do work. This could include additional supervision or sign off of their work by a competent operator.
 
#9
I understand that training is not the only way to get competence. The heart of the question surrounds evaluation of competence and how / if to document it.
If you have a list of competencies, like:

Can demonstrate correct use of micrometers, verniers and DTI measuring equipment
Can demonstrate correct use of manual cmm, positioning, zeroing...blah, blah, blah

Each can be checked off, , if needed "conditionally", with any need for "improvement", plus the desired actions recorded and followed up.
 
Last edited:
T

Tavoludo

#10
Iowamech in order to get competence, have you tryied the system:
1.- I do, I explain
2.- You do, I explain.
3.- I do, You explain.
4.- You do, you explain.?
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
B Struggling with using the 5.6 version Ford Capacity Analysis Report APQP and PPAP 5
F Struggling with a root cause analysis - Customer Returns - Escape issue Problem Solving, Root Cause Fault and Failure Analysis 15
Proud Liberal Struggling w/ GR&R on ID Spline Runout Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 0
T Struggling with ISO 13485:2016 Clause 6.2 - Level of Risk Associated with Work ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
S Struggling with definition of Initial Importer and First Title 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
B Struggling With Writing PA (Preventive Action) Procedure Preventive Action and Continuous Improvement 11
M A newbie to RM struggling with the policy ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 1
S Are you struggling with your IEC 60601-1 3rd edition testing lab? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 16
K Struggling with the Gap Analysis Documentation for IEC 60601 IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 3
A Struggling with Process and Sub-Process Validation - Brain Catheter Design and Development of Products and Processes 2
L Struggling with Writing Effective Root Cause Statements Problem Solving, Root Cause Fault and Failure Analysis 13
B Quality Planning process map - Struggling to define all the inputs and outputs Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 17
M ASME NQA-1-1994 Standards - Struggling with the supplement references Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 16
C Struggling to teach a co-worker how to read dial calipers, any advice? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 13
K Repetitive Nonconformance (Struggling with Corrective Action Tools) - Need Help! Nonconformance and Corrective Action 14
K Struggling with keeping part-time internal auditors in our program Internal Auditing 15
H Still Struggling.... Control chart practice problems for the CQT Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 3
Q Training Matrix Software Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 1
S ISO 13485 certification training Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 1
S AS9120 - New Internal Auditor Training requirement? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 11
M English Language training on MHLW MO169? Japan Medical Device Regulations 1
M On-demand EU MDR Compliance toolkit with online training courses, templates & document management system Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 0
Sam.F Question about training Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 17
Q Onboarding and Training Checklist Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 5
G Any training material on the 1-10-100 rule? Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 4
Sam.F Anyone knows velocity 360 training Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 11
Q Safety Training Program Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 8
R ISO 17025 Lead Assessor Training ISO 17025 related Discussions 0
A New to QMS and regulatory... advice on training/certification? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
T Counterfeit parts training AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
Anerol C FMEA workshop training South of Texas FMEA and Control Plans 0
Anerol C FMEA Training for South Texas Service Industry Specific Topics 0
N What quality training do you suggest? Manufacturing and Related Processes 14
Q Lead Auditor Training Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 31
S Training in D&D for engineers with no medical device experience Design and Development of Products and Processes 8
CPhelan Optimizing Training Review Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 4
Q Documenting Effectiveness of Training Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 14
J Old procedure review and training requirements Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 9
P Have you purchased training materials from the 13485store.com? Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 0
Q Training For Temps Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 1
S Training for PRRC (person responsible for regulatory compliance) EU Medical Device Regulations 3
T IAQG Approved Training Providers vs. Probitas Authentication Approved Training Providers AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
C Training for Manufacturing Nonconformances and CAPS with focus on the wording Nonconformance and Corrective Action 4
H Product Safety & Conformity Representative (PSCR) Training Company IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 0
Q ISO Training Providers to fix careless workers? Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 19
Q Training Machinists on Company Processes Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 6
R Using Scrapped NC items for training Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 15
D IATF 16949 Clause 7.2.2 - On the job training IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
D Training for ISO 17025 ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
Q Documented Evidence of Training ISO 13485: 2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 46

Similar threads

Top Bottom