Hello! Question on how to treat the use of a sub-component made at another location with the company.
The main location (X) of Company is AS9100 certified and ships directly from X against a customer contract. Location X will be receiving a sub-component made in location Y as part of a final assembly that is shipped from location X. Customer contract to location X requires AS9100 certification and AS9100 compliance for sub-tiers.
We are working on getting Location X compliant to AS9100 and added to the scope / certified in a year. Compliance would be confirmed prior to commodity being incorporated into the deliverable and approved by the customer.
I believe we should treat Company Location Y as an external provider (supplier) and add them the ASL regardless if the location is a part of the Main location X scope.
Is this the right way to treat using a commodity from Location Y? If so, how do I communicate to Top Management that treating Location Y as an external provider is the correct way to meet AS9100D 8.4?
Thanks!
The main location (X) of Company is AS9100 certified and ships directly from X against a customer contract. Location X will be receiving a sub-component made in location Y as part of a final assembly that is shipped from location X. Customer contract to location X requires AS9100 certification and AS9100 compliance for sub-tiers.
We are working on getting Location X compliant to AS9100 and added to the scope / certified in a year. Compliance would be confirmed prior to commodity being incorporated into the deliverable and approved by the customer.
I believe we should treat Company Location Y as an external provider (supplier) and add them the ASL regardless if the location is a part of the Main location X scope.
Is this the right way to treat using a commodity from Location Y? If so, how do I communicate to Top Management that treating Location Y as an external provider is the correct way to meet AS9100D 8.4?
Thanks!