Suitability and Capability of Measurement Equipment

T

TonyCA

#1
We recently had an customer audit and received a nonconformance for not having records for section A of 21CFR820.72-Control of inspection, measuring, and test equipment. What proof is needed to determine if equipment is suitable for its intended purpose and is capable of producing valid results?

Thanks for your imput

-Tony:)
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

GStough

Staff member
Super Moderator
#2
Re: Suitability and capablity of measuring equipment

We recently had an customer audit and received a nonconformance for not having records for section A of 21CFR820.72-Control of inspection, measuring, and test equipment. What proof is needed to determine if equipment is suitable for its intended purpose and is capable of producing valid results?

Thanks for your imput

-Tony:)
Hi TonyCA and welcome to the Cove! :bigwave:

What about preventive maintenance, calibration, equipment inspection, etc. records to demonstrate that the equipment is suitable for its intended purpose?

Product inspection and/or testing results might also demonstrate that the equipment is capable of producing valid results.

Hope this helps.
 
J

justncredible

#3
Re: Suitability and capablity of measuring equipment

Anything used to measure needs to be controled and calibrated, so a scale used to weigh a part has to be calibrated and has to have a way to prove it is correct and some set of rules saying when and what action will be taken to make sure it is working and is under control.
 
D

David DeLong

#4
Re: Suitability and capablity of measuring equipment

We recently had an customer audit and received a nonconformance for not having records for section A of 21CFR820.72-Control of inspection, measuring, and test equipment. What proof is needed to determine if equipment is suitable for its intended purpose and is capable of producing valid results?

Thanks for your imput

-Tony:)
Tony:

I would always suggest that you select a measuring instrument that can read down to at least 1/10th the part tolerance. That is considered suitable. Make sure that your calibration sheet for this instrument indicates where it can be used.

I always remember a grinding machine Operator trying to use a .001 micrometer on a tolerance range of .0007". It sure didn't work out well. He should have used a digital micrometer that could read in tenths (still not quite the 10%) and the company eventually purchased this measuring instrument for him.

As far a capability, the R & R study is great. There are quite a few excel files shown in this forum that could be used. The automotive companies state that a measuring instrument should not use any more than 30% of the process but if you were not in the automotive game, make it no more than 30% of the tolerance (or state of the art).

Hope these thoughts help out.
 

BradM

Staff member
Admin
#5
Re: Suitability and capablity of measuring equipment

Hello, Tony! Welcome to the discussion board!:bigwave:

We recently had an customer audit and received a nonconformance for not having records for section A of 21CFR820.72-Control of inspection, measuring, and test equipment. What proof is needed to determine if equipment is suitable for its intended purpose and is capable of producing valid results?

Thanks for your input

-Tony:)
A nonconformance, huh? Let me ask you this... instead of focusing on what you don't have, what do you have? Do you perform calibrations? Do you have records? Do you perform any level of validation/ verification of the equipment?

Of the equipment you don't have calibrated, is there a cross-functional way to verify the operation of equipment, either by it's output, or comparison to an industry standard/specification?
 
J

justncredible

#6
Re: Suitability and capablity of measuring equipment

"resoution to be at most 1/10 of total process six sigma devation instead of the traditional rule"

page 46 of msa 3rd ed.


just dun ask me what that means........... a stable process and then look where it runs and 1/10th of that........OMG!


and to think I was getting quotes for a redesign of my companys gages, just got the first @ $20,000, I will have to rethink it. I just read the MSA this last week. :biglaugh:
 
#7
Re: Suitability and capablity of measuring equipment

Tony, Welcome to the Cove :bigwave:

What GMP is trying to do is ensure you can trust your equipment. So the question is how can you have faith in your devices? The answer needs to be 1) valid, and 2) documented. Now, there may be some room for argument about #2. Calibration records 820.72 (b) (2), relate to calibration (they are a subset of 820.72 (b) (2), not 820.72 (b) (1). However, at the bottom of 820.72 (b) (1), there is the language "These activities shall be documented." This requires answer to the question of how you ensure your equipment is suitable, and can produce valid results be documented.

As Dave mentioned, a Gauge R&R is one way of showing capability (and one I too, would recommend), but it is not required.
 
T

TonyCA

#8
Re: Suitability and capablity of measuring equipment

Brad,

We do have records of calibration, validations, and inspection results. Calibration is outsourced. We do a loose validation of the manufacturing equipment. I think what they were after was how do you know if that particular measuring device is right for that measurement application.
 

BradM

Staff member
Admin
#9
Re: Suitability and capablity of measuring equipment

Brad,

We do have records of calibration, validations, and inspection results. Calibration is outsourced. We do a loose validation of the manufacturing equipment. I think what they were after was how do you know if that particular measuring device is right for that measurement application.
Ok... I'm getting confused. Exactly what did they cite (and did they list a section) for the nonconformance? Were there specific (critical) pieces of equipment which had no verification of any kind?

I agree with the other guys that R&R is a very good practice:yes:, and if you have documented validation and calibration records, by default, that is the verification they are suitable for the measurement application and are providing the appropriate results.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
V System suitability or stability during continuous usage Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 0
V Selecting System Precision Criteria - System Suitability Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
D Suitability of Attribute Control Charts for ppm Level Control Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 6
M Suitability and Meaning of PED (Pre-Established Dispositions) to Quality Objectives IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
B Suitability, Adequacy and Effectiveness Examples ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 15
P Help on p-chart - Computing new control limits and chart suitability Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 4
Q Auditing - Ideological battle with our Manager regarding Suitability of Processes General Auditing Discussions 6
M Par.5.6.1 Demonstration of suitability, adequacy and effectiveness of QMS ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
M Frequency of Measurement Systems Analysis to Ensure Suitability General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 9
G How do you determine system suitability and effectiveness of a new system? Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 3
D Hit for not reviewing System Suitability in Management Review Management Review Meetings and related Processes 6
K Machine Capability Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 2
C How to Establish the Calibration & Measurement Capability (CMC)? ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
lanley liao How to keep the manufacturing capability under the API monogram Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 6
M Minitab Capability of the Population (no sampling) Using Minitab Software 11
A Capability Study - in the beginning of your career what should you have known about the tool Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 11
B Two excellent examples of process capability analysis from Quality Magazine Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 5
Q Capability study with a minimum spec Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 8
Q Capability - CPk comparison values Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 12
R Capability analysis - What is going on this chart? Manufacturing and Related Processes 15
H Capability Data for Paint Thickness on Painted Parts Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 10
N Is capability applicable for a destructive test? Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 9
S Capability or Gage R&R Study for Leak Tester? Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 15
D Pre-Production Capability Assesment Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 5
T Iec 60601 Impedance and current-carrying capability IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
S Machine Setup for a CNC Machine Capability Study Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 1
D O Ring capability and measurement - What is the automotive 'norm' for capability studies on O Rings? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
M Measuring Capability of Process with Multiple Specifications Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 6
G Capability Study for Tapped Hole Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 3
E Sampling for capability studies for variables and attributes Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 4
L How to evaluate the process capability of a data set that is non-normal (cannot be transformed and does not fit any known distribution)? Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 12
T Final process capability results - What I am supposed to present? Cp and CpK? APQP and PPAP 11
G Plotting capability study data - I have a bimodular data distribution Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 4
A Statistic Tools to Know Capability of Sealing Machine for Seal Width Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 3
Q How to perform Process Capability for true position Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 11
V Generic requirements regarding capability study in automotive Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 1
A Capability Analysis for Packaging Seal Strength with spec. >0.1 Kgf using Minitab Using Minitab Software 6
J Initial capability for injection molding part Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 6
Ron Rompen Ford Method - Position Capability with MMC Modifier Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 14
O Capability or Gage R&R Study for Leak Tester Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 11
S Understanding control chart and measurement capability Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 2
L IATF 16949 Cl. 8.3.3.2 Manufacturing process design input - Process capability IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
B Short term vs Long term Capability - We ship millions of parts in a year Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 7
M IATF 16949 - Capability study on non critical dimensions? Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 4
J Are Capability Requirement(s) Valid for All Characteristics? Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 6
Y Process Capability for Non-Normal Data - Philosophical Questions Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 6
M Process Capability in a High Precision Environment Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 7
M CAAC-145 Manuals - Looking for examples of MOM's, MMM's Capability Lists, etc. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 13
J Powdercoating Capability Employing a Robotic Arm Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
L Excel Template for Cgk Study wanted (Capability Gauges Study) Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 12

Similar threads

Top Bottom