What could be the behaviour of a second part auditor in case of Supplier audit, in case he/she notices a ncn vs Supplier QMS, already certified by a third part auditor?
To better specify: scope of a supplier audit could also be to assess its QMS before a formal qualification, but on the field the customer audit team has evidence that there is one or more lackings in the mandatory requirements of a certain standard under the scope ( e.g. ISO 9001/ISO TS), for example clear definition of 4.1 , 5.6.1 etc... requirements?
Could the supplier affirm that they have the certification in their hands and so the third part auditor was satisfied with the evidences in registration audit?
Thoughts???
To better specify: scope of a supplier audit could also be to assess its QMS before a formal qualification, but on the field the customer audit team has evidence that there is one or more lackings in the mandatory requirements of a certain standard under the scope ( e.g. ISO 9001/ISO TS), for example clear definition of 4.1 , 5.6.1 etc... requirements?
Could the supplier affirm that they have the certification in their hands and so the third part auditor was satisfied with the evidences in registration audit?
Thoughts???
