Letter: What About Ford's Global8D?
Posted: Mar 14, 2005 2:12 PM
Larry Smith's article "Back to the Future at Ford" (March 2005, p. 50)was excellent! Sustaining basics will always be challenged as world markets build and then, inevitably, drop; good practice will always be threatened by expediency and memory loss.
One tool not mentioned in Smith's article is Ford’s Global8D. It is the most systematic fire fighting tool developed and should - in my opinion - stand side by side with Six Sigma. G8D in the long run is one excellent source of Six Sigma projects if used properly, since it asks the team/individual before they wrap up the fire-fight, "What was wrong with the system that allowed this or similar problems to occur in the first place?"
Larry, what is your take on the value (past, present, future) of Global8D?
I’m still amazed as I deliver TRIZ programs, how much fire fighting is still going on in western corporations, and draining precious technical resources.
Regards,
Dan Heck
wdp|consulting
Buffalo Grove, IL
dheck@wdpconsulting
@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@
Re: Letter: What About Ford's Global8D?
Posted: Mar 22, 2005 11:37 AM
AUTHOR'S RESPONSE
Dan,
Thank you for your comments.
Ford Global
8D (G8D) was established in the 1980's to provide a disciplined and systematic process for solving problems and preventing their recurrence. The result of combining the best-practices of several methodologies, the eight steps are:
1. Process Preparation
2. Establish a Team
3. Describe the Problem
4. Develop an Interim Containment Action
5. Define and Verify Root Cause
6. Choose and Verify Permanent Corrective Actions
7. Prevent Recurrence
8. Recognize Team and Individual Contributions
When used properly, the G8D has tremendous value, encouraging teams to really define root cause by carefully defining what the problem "is" and "is not," and asking "why, why, why." It provides a high level organization of the problem solving activity, and is a very useful communication and corporate memory tool.
The G8D is still used extensively with Ford suppliers. Although the methodology is also used inside Ford, many Ford teams are choosing to use the Six Sigma DMAIC methodology in place of the G8D. I suspect this trend will continue.
My opinion is that G8D is best used in problem solving situations that deal with special causes, whereas DMAIC Six Sigma is the methodology of choice for addressing common cause problems.
Larry Smith