Testing (Evaluation of) and Verification of Employee Color Vision

Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Ninja

Looking for Reality
Trusted Information Resource
#13
Assuming that you are using people's ability to discern color as a way to speed things up...then using a gage to confirm...

Look instead at how you can use the gage as primary...even if it means a tweak to the production process...there are a large number of gages available, from hand-held to in-line automated...

Use the gage as primary, and people as backups ... not the other way around...
 

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
#14
They have to visual notice the color change, then use the instrument to verify and/or compare to a approved harmony master part.
The problem with this is that there can be significantly different levels of acuity along the visual spectrum, which is why I agreed with the suggestion to use the Munsell test kit. Some people are better at discerning differences in one part of the spectrum than at others. The Munsell test will tell you what you need to know across the spectrum.
 

Johnnymo62

Haste Makes Waste
#15
The color instruments are expensive and all of our plants, at m last company, only had one or two. Upper management would not support having a color instrument for every press. So, it is necessary to have people able to notice changes in the hue. We used the test of people's vision to verify they can notice change. That is why I recommended the test in my first reply.
 
#16
Curious, is this for currently employed personnel, or as a screening test for applicants? If they are current employees, I am not sure you can fire them for failing the test, but instead reassign them. As a screening test for new employees, you can make it terms of employment (though I bet it is still a legal issue).
This would be used to validate current people if they did not pass the test they would not fire they would be moved in jobs where color acuity is not required. We do many items in various colors and need to make sure the people that are making the decision on is something in the approved range can actually recognize the color.

Thanks,

Steve
 
#17
There are several methods already mentioned, and the selection of the method will be determined by exactly what you are trying to assess. Is it the ability to see color at all? The ability to distinguish between shades of the same color (and if so, how 'precise' do they need to be?), or something else entirely?
This would be more of being able to distinguish between shades of a color as we have need to stay with in the approved color range they need to 90% accurate in our industry.
 

Ron Rompen

Trusted Information Resource
#18
The Munsell test is the best one (that I am aware of) to demonstrate the ability to discriminate between shades - I will add a note of caution though. The inspection conditions MUST duplicate the conditions of the testing, or the evaluation is meaningless. This includes the amount (and type and color) of lighting, etc.
 
#19
Is there some type of online resource that can be used to test people?
The problem with any online test is the variance in monitors and their limited display of color. Even if you had everyone use the same monitor at a work location, chances are it would look nothing like the monitor of the person who developed such a test. (A former employer sent out new web versions of the company colors every couple of years. I had no proof, but I suspect it changed every time the person writing the document had a new monitor).
 

Johnnymo62

Haste Makes Waste
#20
Everyone knew that color instrument is expensive right?
They are. There are many used ones available for reduced rates. But, beware there are alot of older instruments that don't meet the current standards for certain industries.

I would see how many rejected shipments of material for incorrect color it would take to pay for a new instrument to make a case to buy one.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
T HF testing / Summative evaluation for MDDS class I necessary? Human Factors and Ergonomics in Engineering 2
DitchDigger IEC 60601-1 subclause 5.1 - Adequate evaluation in lieu of testing IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
P IEC 62304 - evaluation of integration and system testing IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 4
B Evaluation of Basic Safety during EMC Immunity or Climate Testing IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 0
J Biocompatibility Evaluation component other than Testing Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 1
C Biocompatibility Evaluation Testing on Single Use Tube Sets Other Medical Device Related Standards 9
J Biological Evaluation requirements per ISO 10993 - Medical Device Testing ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
U Medical Device Design finalization testing ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
Jane's Like-for-like critical raw material change qualification - type of testing/ number of lots required ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
J Conflict of Interest Registrar/Notified Body/Testing House Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 4
M Inter-operator Variability Testing - Requirements for EU Medical Device Regulations 5
S High voltage testing - ISO 17025 - 7.2.2 Validation of methods and 7.3 Sampling ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
M Production approval testing - Alternative ideas for Validation Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 4
JoCam MDL in Canada without Canadian Electrical Testing Canada Medical Device Regulations 0
K Diagnostic X-ray devices - Applicability of Biocompatibility Testing per ISO 10993-1 Manufacturing and Related Processes 5
K Proper document of SMPS used in infant warmer for IEC 60601-1 testing IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 1
K Sequence of testing in IEC 60601-1 IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
M Workplace Drug Testing in 2020 Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 9
W ASTM F1929 dye penetration test - validation for in-house testing ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
J FDA wants electrical safety testing on battery powered medical device US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 7
S Internal calibrations - Part of an ISO 17025 accredited testing laboratory (Automotive) ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
T Qualification testing of Lead acid batteries Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 0
D Sterility and BioBurden Testing for Plastics ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
E Correct way to certify hydrostatic testing when it is not 100% (and Sample Size) Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 6
MrTetris Are GLP required for testing cytotoxicity and soil remaining after sterilization of MD? Other Medical Device Related Standards 8
D Design Verification - Is testing required? Design and Development of Products and Processes 5
M Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) Testing - What Standard to Use? Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 1
N IATF 16949:2016 7.1.5.3.2 External Laboratory - How to approve the Testing Laboratory without accreditation scope IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
T Spirometer - Pulmonary Function Testing - ATS/ERS:2005 EU Medical Device Regulations 5
M 510(k) 10993 Biocompability Testing Other US Medical Device Regulations 15
C Sterility and Bioburden Testing - LAL passed under 0.5EU/mL Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 3
A ISO 17025 Requirement 6.2 - Department Manager Testing Qualifications ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
H EO Sterilization Validation - Sterility Testing and Load Configuration Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
M What to do in SOP Phase of Head unit testing? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 0
W SOP examples wanted - Soil, Concrete and Asphalt testing ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
M Informational TGA Consultation: Review of the regulation of certain self-testing IVDs in Australia Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
F Proficiency Testing for ISO 17025: AC Current Ranges ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
K Mammography Machine Bench Testing - FDA 510(K) US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 5
D Is Human Factors testing mandatory for a 510(k) submission? Human Factors and Ergonomics in Engineering 16
W My company is looking to start a materials testing lab that conforms to ISO17025:2017 ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
P Testing lab in India IEC 60601-2-25 IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 2
D Testing to failure for design verification Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 11
M Microbiological Testing Lab - Layout & Standards Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
M Informational US FDA draft guidance – Testing and Labeling Medical Devices for Safety in the Magnetic Resonance (MR) Environment Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
Manix Supplied Steel Material Testing Norms and Requirements Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 1
M Reliability Testing - Weibull Analysis Help Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 4
M Routine testing of medical electrical systems - What specific electrical safety tests should be performed? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 5
M Raw stock material testing discrepancy using an XRF (x-ray fluorescence) analyzer Manufacturing and Related Processes 7
K How Many Samples to send for Chemistry Testing Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 3
D QA Inspector testing - Test for competency Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 1
Similar threads


















































Top Bottom