The ink is dry(ing) on the revision of ISO 14001:2015. “Is the payoff worth the price

L

LEJoh

#1
The work of writing the new standard is done. Over the summer countries involved in helping to develop the international standard to promote robust, credible and reliable environmental management systems will be reviewing the Final Draft International Standard (the FDIS) and deciding if it meets agreed to operating principles and other technical criteria of importance to their market.
There are many changes in this revision. Some of these include:
 the new framework based on Annex SL, often referred to as the ‘HLS’ or high level structure,
 risk-based thinking (not risk assessment),
 life cycle thinking (not life cycle assessment)
 a stronger connection to the core strategy of the ‘business’ (whether for or not-for profit, public or private sector)
 the implication of prevention action versus an explicit requirement
 deleted terms and definitions, new and modified ones
There are clauses that users, who have reviewed the draft, have said are a definite value-add to their EMS, such as the section on leadership, and the tie to core strategy.
This revision was not an easy process given the number of changes; the new standard is not perfect. It is important to remember that a standard is the product of negotiation, which strives for consensus; most words are a compromise of concepts and various languages.
It is important in any standard to preserve flexibility balanced with audit certainty. Some clauses are evidence that this was a struggle; there is a clear advantage for those that were in the room during the negotiations who were privy to the rationale behind the compromises made. Due to some of these weaknesses, many countries are also considering additional support mechanisms. Some countries are already busy writing their own interpretation guidance, understandable when English is not the first language for all. Even when a version of the ‘King’s English’ (or Queen’s) is the official language, there are regional variations and local connotations; <<we’re Canadian, eh>>.
National committees will be busy for at least two years providing formal interpretations when users, consultants, auditors and registrars seek clarification of a new concept or clause, which they view as ambiguous. Some clauses have not added requirements but have rewritten them to align with the HLS. Also, given changes in terms and definitions, with some requirements are now ‘implied’, whereas they used to be explicit, some users will be sorely challenged.
Understanding how to benefit from the new framework and the new requirements can be useful when considering the suitability of the standard and how it can meet the needs of the organization. There will be a webinar on June 24th, if anyone is interested information is on E2M's website at http://www.e2management.com
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
JoshuaFroud Addressing wet ink signatures when more than one site is involved 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 8
S Food Safe Ink for reusable and disposable gloves US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
J Individual part traceability - ink/paint sprayer? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
K Document Control - Type-able Forms vs. Ink Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 10
T The Use of Pencils and Ink Erasers in Records Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 5
M VDA 6.3 Automotive Requirement vs. ink-off VDA Standards - Germany's Automotive Standards 3
P IMDS Classification for Marking Ink RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 9
R FDA Rules and Requirements for Keeping Ink Signed Documents 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 6
T Stamping Original Paper Document 'Record Copy' in Red Ink - Document Control Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 4
N Measuring Photoluminescence - Photoluminescent Ink on a Plastic Part Manufacturing and Related Processes 16
R Etching Ink Process for Identification Purposes - Help needed Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
E Ink and Toner Cartridge Remanufacturing Processes Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 8
B Control of various Ink Stamps such as Acceptance, Document Status, etc. Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
P We Share A Common Goal - Printing, paper, and ink (and related) industries Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 16
H Ink for Stamping P/N and Revision on Metal Parts (instead of labeling) Manufacturing and Related Processes 6
J Looking for MIL-P-15147 - Ink marking copper-nickel tubing Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 4
Ajit Basrur Pad Printing Ink Requirements for pad printed medical device ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
O Is there a Relevant Ink / Print Adhesion Standard (ASTM?) Standard? Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 8
R Operation sign-offs and test stamps for KanBan cards - Inspection stamp ink smears Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 2
Sidney Vianna The Brits keep coming - John Seddon gets more ink in the British media Philosophy, Gurus, Innovation and Evolution 24
R Ink and Label Shelf Life and Internal Concessions for Expired Stock ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 19
J ISO 15223-1: Keep dry vs. humidity limitation label symbol Other Medical Device Related Standards 2
L Dry Lube Application (Ever lube 620) - Manual Application vs. Automated Spray Process Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
J Ever gone "Dry-Dock fishing?" Funny Stuff - Jokes and Humour 0
N Dehumidified (Dry) Cleanroom - Running a Cleanroom at very low RH Manufacturing and Related Processes 23
B Fabricated Dry Powder Storage Tank - Initial Cleaning Food Safety - ISO 22000, HACCP (21 CFR 120) 5
AnaMariaVR2 Dry & Humid Rooms Environmental Monitoring Systems ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
A Microbial Limit (Bioburden)on dry nonwoven that used for making Hand sanitizing wipes ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
O 1kg Dry Ice(Compressed CO2) = what CO2E/MetricTon Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 2
DanteCaspian Dry Erase: Custom documents with laminate sheets Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 7
E Dry vs. Wet Grinding Manufacturing and Related Processes 6
P VMP template for a Dry Heat Depyrogenation Oven FAT thru PQ Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 1
C Packaging: "thoroughly purged and filled with dry nitrogen gas" Manufacturing and Related Processes 6
T Searching for: Procedure for validation of dry measure Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 2
Ronen E FDA News FDA's CDRH is silo-ing along product lines - CDRH Reorganization Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 4
G Could I destroy my DHR hard copy after 2 years after pdf'ing them ? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
R Double Spec'ing in Control Plans FMEA and Control Plans 11
Similar threads





































Top Bottom