SBS - The best value in QMS software

The Next version of ISO 9001 (2008 version) - Any news?

T

tyker

Re: The Next version of ISO 9001 - Any news?

Your argument is that the information you have will allow you to meet the requirements. Yes, it probably could, if it is not defined as a controlled document in your QMS.

My argument is you are going to a lot of trouble to save $40. What are you communicating to your management and personnel about your "commitment" toward ISO and continual improvement. What are you inferring as to the value and importance of it? How do you think new people and new auditors will feel about a company too cheap to drop $40?

I could go on, but you get the gist of my view. I don't think an established company has to buy 50 copies and send people to upgrade training. But ISO moves on and I think you need to also.

Whether I would write an NC depends on how effective your implementation is, but I would put it at better than 50% chance.

ISO 9001 is a controlled document in my system and its status will be correctly identified. It just won't be the latest edition. If other people in the organization used it, it could be a concern but I'm the only one who ever needs to.

What does it say about my company?
We're a bunch of cheapskates, perhaps.
Or just possibly we're doing our best to avoid waste and keeping our unnecessary costs down for our customer's benefit. We spend money when we can demonstrate a clear need and nobody in this organization would dare question my commitment.

Its not the amount of money I object to, its spending anything at all on this change and I'm not going to a lot of trouble, I'm not doing anything at all other than maintaining an awareness of the situation.

I don't know what the reaction of our audit body will be (which is why I am genuinely interested in your opinion), I'll find out at the next visit in mid-December.

In response to Jim's question. In my 3rd party auditing days, I did, on occasions, ask to see their copy of ISO 9001 when I was auditing the document control activity. It certainly wasn't a question that came up every visit.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Jim Wynne

Staff member
Admin
Re: The Next version of ISO 9001 - Any news?

In response to Jim's question. In my 3rd party auditing days, I did, on occasions, ask to see their copy of ISO 9001 when I was auditing the document control activity. It certainly wasn't a question that came up every visit.
The only time I can recall being asked by a third-party auditor was when an auditor didn't have his own copy with him and needed to use mine. :eek:
 
J

Jeff Frost

Re: The Next version of ISO 9001 - Any news?

This could bite you if your customer requires your quality management system comply with the requirements of ISO 9001:2008. I have been asked by 2nd party auditors to produce a controlled copy of ISO 9001 standard based on his organizations requirements.
 

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Staff member
Admin
Re: The Next version of ISO 9001 - Any news?

ISO 9001 is a controlled document in my system and its status will be correctly identified. It just won't be the latest edition.
I would also like to add that ISO 9000, a NORMATIVE reference in ISO 9001, was re-issued in 2005. To the best of my knowledge, there was no Worldwide campaign forcing the users of ISO 9001 to get a copy of ISO 9000:2005. Why? Because the changes in that document were considered inconsequential. A "legal" precedent.

Your Honor, I rest my case.:tg:
 
Last edited:

Paul Simpson

Trusted Information Resource
Re: The Next version of ISO 9001 - Any news?

Far be it from me to cause trouble :bigwave: but I'm hearing the same thing from everyone here. We are the customers of this committee. We are users of this standard. Now the same old committee members will push this out with no value add, then tour the consulting circuit or write a book and make a bundle. I had to co-present with a couple of these guys, and I was quite frankly embarrassed (Mark censor me if you must but it's the truth!). TC 176 should do a better job of screening their committee members.
If I can copy - Far be it from me to cause trouble :bigwave: Not only are we the customers of the committee we also form it! You and I have National standards making bodies who put forward 'experts' to represent them (and their country) on the committee. So not only are we standards users we are the developers. If you want to influence your country's position find out who represents the USA. Failing that carry on contributing and the likes of me will take the (international) view to committee meetings - we're not all partisan!

As for your other comments - I can't comment without you naming names (we've never shared a stage have we? :lol:). I for one have seen some committee representatives who I respect and have a lot of time for. ISO is a consensus process. We don't agree with all the decisions but abide by them.

So what do we learn from this? Do we start a grass-roots effort to stop the nonsense with TC 176 and drive real improvement? How many hours were spent on this revision which says NOTHING??? Sorry - a little fired up. Quit smoking recently - :whip:
Perhaps you could start a 'grass roots' to get people involved in ISO - if you have the time to spare for no pay!

As mentioned above ISO standards are a consensus process. There are many members of TC 176 who wanted more in the way of change but the majority prevails. Perhaps the minimal changes are an opportunity for those who haven't got their heads round the 2000 revision to make the changes to their quality approach.

Believe it or not some of us are critical of other covers approaches to quality management and compliance with ISO 9001.
 

Stijloor

Staff member
Super Moderator
Re: The Next version of ISO 9001 - Any news?

Friends,

Can we please put this thing to bed? :tg:

Did William Shakespeare write: "Much ado about nothing?"

Stijloor.
 
Last edited:

Helmut Jilling

Auditor / Consultant
Re: The Next version of ISO 9001 - Any news?

Do you normally ask to see the auditee's copy of the standard? I don't want to go off on a tangent here because there's there's another discussion thread dedicated to the topic, but I'm curious.

Not usually. However, when there is an update, sometimes I ask. Usually, it is on the external document control list.

The real issue typically would arise when there is an issue with a new requirement. Imay ask them to review it in their copy of the standard to determine whether they were even aware of the requirement. It generally develops from there...

The goal is effective implementation, not the sale of books, of course.
 
J

Jim Green

Re: The Next version of ISO 9001 - Any news?

Jim Q public here-

Just the mere fact that the Quality experts ( I honestly consider you folks experts) are in disagreement over to buy or not buy a copy of the standard tells me To run out and buy one as soon as possible cause now it is a potential "thing".

I could call my auditing company and ask them.

Conversation- Hello third party auditing body. Do I need to have a copy of the new standard?

Answer: yada yada yada, maybe, could be, all depends.

Wishful answer: Yes, and the reason why. No, and the reason why.
 

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Staff member
Admin
Re: The Next version of ISO 9001 - Any news?

Friends,

Can we please put this thing to bed? :tg:

Did William Shakespeare write: "Much ado about nothing?"

Stijloor.
Actually, Jan, I think this is a great discussion. And is not about nothing. Why should ISO and the TC 176 profit financially from spending a review cycle and releasing a product that does not significantly improve the previous generation? At least, they should have the courage to finish the sentence: ISO 9001:2008 has no new requirements and you are not obligated to get a copy if you (truly) complies with ISO 9001:2000.

This is not even a face lift.
 

Stijloor

Staff member
Super Moderator
Re: The Next version of ISO 9001 - Any news?

Actually, Jan, I think this is a great discussion. And is not about nothing. Why should ISO and the TC 176 profit financially from spending a review cycle and releasing a product that does not significantly improve the previous generation? At least, they should have the courage to finish the sentence: ISO 9001:2008 has no new requirements and you are not obligated to get a copy if you (truly) complies with ISO 9001:2000.

This is not even a face lift.
I agree. Good points. I'll continue to watch...;)

Stijloor.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
2 Next Version of ISO 27001 and Likely Areas with Changes? IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 7
T What is the status of the next version of ISO 14001? ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 72
Michael Malis FDA final version of Strategic Priorities for the next 5 years US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
W Next Calibration Due Date Calibration Frequency (Interval) 5
E Our company is planning to file MDD not MDR next month. Do we require to show chemical characterization report ? CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 2
Y ASQ CQE and CSSGB; What next? Career and Occupation Discussions 1
M What to Expect from Next IEC 60601-1 and IEC 60601-1-2 Amendments? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 7
Sidney Vianna Interesting Discussion ISO 9001:2024 - What should be changed in the next Edition of ISO 9001? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 114
M Informational EU – Next Notified Body designated to the MDR 2017/475 is IMQ S.p.A from Italy Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Informational Next meeting of the Medical Device Coordination Group (MDR/IVDR) – 20 June 2019 Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 2
D Necessity of external watchdog next to internal watchdog ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 1
C Acquiring an IATF 16949 Certified Company - What happens at the next audit? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
K Everybody ready for round 2? Our next audit is in late January IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9
B Interview Presentation for Quality Engineer Role Next Week! Career and Occupation Discussions 21
B I have CSBB Cert - CQE vs. CMQ/OE next? Professional Certifications and Degrees 4
qualprod Risk closeout , mitigation was not effective, next? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
A Passed the AATT Exam - What come comes next? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
F Supplier Audits - Creative ways to gain confidence in the next Supplier Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 6
Q Passed ASQ Certified Quality Process Analyst Exam! What next? Professional Certifications and Degrees 7
P Is the next revision of ISO 15378 following the High Level Structure? Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 5
I What are considered next generation ITSM tools? IT (Information Technology) Service Management 1
rob73 New MDD (European Medical Device Regulations) next steps - 2016 EU Medical Device Regulations 1
L Where next? Thinking outside the QMS box Career and Occupation Discussions 9
C Quality Assurance Manager ? Next Steps? Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 10
B Chi-square test - What do I do next? Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 2
S QSB+ revoked - Notify registrar, what's next? Customer and Company Specific Requirements 3
hogheavenfarm Suggestions for next Professional Certification Professional Certifications and Degrees 11
S What are the next steps after providing response to FDA 483 ? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 7
P Do CQE exam questions repeat in next exams? Professional Certifications and Degrees 1
B Anyone Attending OTC next week in Houston? (Offshore Technology Confernce) Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 0
T FDA Form 483 Warning Letter - What next? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 7
S Delegation of Response to Next Level ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
K Building Heavy Pollution Factory next to Medical Device Factory (ISO 13485) ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
S Update from Australia and NZ regulatory bodies - ANZTPA in next 5 years Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
W ISO 9001 Certified - Active Six Sigma - What Next? Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 25
F Career Problem - Industrial design, QA, what next? Career and Occupation Discussions 5
somashekar Supply Chain Oversight is the FDA's Next Area of Concern Other US Medical Device Regulations 0
F What's the next step after failing an AQL? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 7
E What's next after all the certificates and awards? (e.g.: ISO 9001, ISO 1400, etc.) Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 1
B The next (5th) revision of ISO 9001 - When available? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
K Procedures and Quality Manual written - Where next? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 14
L Calibration - Buying New Tools - How do you determine the next calibration date? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 12
xcanals_tecno-med.es MDD 93/42 as amended by dir 2007/47 in force next week (21 mars) EU Medical Device Regulations 2
N What sampling plan should I use for the next lot. Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 2
O Need to Create Macros so that it can copy data to the next row.... Excel .xls Spreadsheet Templates and Tools 5
C What is the next ISO 9001? 9001:2009 or 9001:2014 or? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
P PMA called for a class III-510(k)..what next? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 4
K Status of ISO 17025 (Next Revision, Which Committee does it?) ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
Wes Bucey If you get laid off this Friday, what's next? Career and Occupation Discussions 12
L SC in a circle next to feature box - Is this "Statistical Control" Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 17

Similar threads

Top Bottom