SBS - The best value in QMS software

The Next version of ISO 9001 (2008 version) - Any news?

Paul Simpson

Trusted Information Resource
#41
Re: The Next version of ISO 9001 - Any news?

As a member of the US TAG, I find this discussion to be very amusing.
Welcome aboard, Bear41. Glad you find us so amusing.
Where do some of you get your information?
Here, mainly.

We rely on the quality of the posts and jump on those that give inaccurate information.

ISO 9000:2005 has already been released.

ISO 9001:2009 will be revised to include clarifications ONLY -- mainly from the already published interpretations. This standard is still at the CD stage, so it's a little early for webinars.
Why not start early on? As far as I am concerned the earlier we, as consultants, auditors, implementers, get to understand any implications the better so as not to be caught by surprise. Mostly we get information through a forum like this but if the kind contributers point at webinars they are holding then I am grateful.

ISO 9004:200X is being completely re-written. Lord knows when there will be international agreement on it. In February, the US TAG approved a version drafted by Jack West and myself. This will be submitted to SG 2 of T/C 176.
Perhaps you can add some real value to your contribution by posting what "You and Jack" think ISO 9004 should be.

All but 1 or 2 CBs do not participate on the TAG, so any information from a CB auditor should be taken with a grain of salt.
Many CBs are active through their standards committees. I take your point about some CB auditors but some others are quite knowledgeable (and amusing!).
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
T

tyker

#42
Re: The Next version of ISO 9001 - Any news?

Some people are so easily amused.

I'm sure we all appreciate Bear41 letting us know that ISO 9000 was reissued a couple of years ago. I must get round to buying a copy some year.

Most of us are concerned about 9001 which will have knock on effects on TS16949 and others.
This thread is mainly about the 2009 revisions. I've expressed concern elsewhere on this forum that the revisions to the standard seem to be more of a money grabbing exercise by the standards bodies than a value adding exercise for their customers. Perhaps Bear41 could share with us the benefits perceived by the authors which would justify relieving us of our hard earned £ $ etc for the correction of the ambiguities created in 2000. If the changes really are so trivial, will they be published as a free of charge correction or amendment?
 

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Staff member
Admin
#43
Re: The Next version of ISO 9001 - Any news?

ISO 9001:2009 will be revised to include clarifications ONLY -- mainly from the already published interpretations. This standard is still at the CD stage, so it's a little early for webinars.
When I start my webinar, I will let people know that some protest it:tg: . As some have already asked. The Design Specification (which I posted here at the Cove) for the ISO 9001:20089 calls for clarifications only. So, why is it that it takes so many TC and TAG meetings to reach consensus on minor clarifications? Further, at the second to the last meeting in Ireland, the French and New Zealand delegation made a point that, following the ISO TC 176 pace, we would have to wait until 2020 to see (possibly) real changes to the ISO 9001 document. In other words, the Standard would have been "untouched" for 2 decades. Can you inform us what was decided in the Busan meeting about that motion?

And, please, do keep us informed. That is the spirit of this Forum. I am glad you found it.
 
Last edited:
V

vanputten

#44
Re: The Next version of ISO 9001 - Any news?

Hello Bear41:

Do you tell your customers that their converstations are "amusing?" Please clarify what is amusing so I can be amused too.

The users of management system standards (Cove members included) are customers of the TAG. In this forum, you are writing to your customers.

If users of management system standards are mis-informed, then I assume that you are concerned about the ISO/TAG methods for supporting awareness and competency of the users. Or is it a problem with the users and not the process of providing information?

Is it wrong for users of quality management systems to learn about the process and content of a standard change? If so, why did the ASQ / US Standards Group post the CD of 9001 to the public? Do you think the general public should not be aware of potential clarifications to 9001?

How does your posting support the Principles of Consensus that the US TAG is expected to follow?

Thank you,

Dirk
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Staff member
Admin
#45
Re: The Next version of ISO 9001 - Any news?

Can you inform us what was decided in the Busan meeting about that motion?
The answer to my question is available in the attached document. That means, unless there is a change in the way the TC 176 operates, after the 2009 issuance of the ISO 9001 amendment, the TC 176 will start deliberating on the fifth edition of ISO 9001 around 2014. So, it could be 2020 before we see an ISO 9001 with changes compared to the 2000 Edition. I am not saying it is good or bad. Just a statement of a fact.

The TC 176 Strategic Plan 2010 Horizon document can be downloaded.
 

Attachments

Antonio Vieira

Involved - Posts
Trusted Information Resource
#47
Re: The Next version of ISO 9001 - Any news?

That’s precisely what I said today at the office. As ISO 9001:2009 is going to be almost like 2K version, we are not going to have to study any new version of ISO 9001...
That’s going to be younger people job...:whip:
 
V

vanputten

#48
Re: The Next version of ISO 9001 - Any news?

I removed my posting.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Peters

Quite Involved in Discussions
#49
Re: The Next version of ISO 9001 - Any news?

Any news??
Of course :cool:
Today we have one new information from ISO
Current status of new version of ISO 9001 - CD approved for registration as DIS (stage date: 2007-06-15, publication target date: 2008-10-31)
 

Sidney Vianna

Post Responsibly
Staff member
Admin
#50
Reliable source?

Any news??
Of course :cool:
Today we have one new information from ISO
Current status of new version of ISO 9001 - CD approved for registration as DIS (stage date: 2007-06-15, publication target date: 2008-10-31)
:confused:Thanks for the news, but do you have a source for it? My understanding is that TC 176 was deliberating on CD2, not the DIS version. Also, the 2008 publication target conflicts with previous announcements that it would not be until 2009 for the release of ISO 9001 fourth Edition. I did not see anything in the ISO nor the TC176 websites.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
2 Next Version of ISO 27001 and Likely Areas with Changes? IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 7
T What is the status of the next version of ISO 14001? ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 72
Michael Malis FDA final version of Strategic Priorities for the next 5 years US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
W Next Calibration Due Date Calibration Frequency (Interval) 5
E Our company is planning to file MDD not MDR next month. Do we require to show chemical characterization report ? CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 2
Y ASQ CQE and CSSGB; What next? Career and Occupation Discussions 1
M What to Expect from Next IEC 60601-1 and IEC 60601-1-2 Amendments? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 7
Sidney Vianna Interesting Discussion ISO 9001:2024 - What should be changed in the next Edition of ISO 9001? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 114
M Informational EU – Next Notified Body designated to the MDR 2017/475 is IMQ S.p.A from Italy Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Informational Next meeting of the Medical Device Coordination Group (MDR/IVDR) – 20 June 2019 Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 2
D Necessity of external watchdog next to internal watchdog ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 1
C Acquiring an IATF 16949 Certified Company - What happens at the next audit? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
K Everybody ready for round 2? Our next audit is in late January IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9
B Interview Presentation for Quality Engineer Role Next Week! Career and Occupation Discussions 21
B I have CSBB Cert - CQE vs. CMQ/OE next? Professional Certifications and Degrees 4
qualprod Risk closeout , mitigation was not effective, next? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
A Passed the AATT Exam - What come comes next? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
F Supplier Audits - Creative ways to gain confidence in the next Supplier Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 6
Q Passed ASQ Certified Quality Process Analyst Exam! What next? Professional Certifications and Degrees 7
P Is the next revision of ISO 15378 following the High Level Structure? Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 5
I What are considered next generation ITSM tools? IT (Information Technology) Service Management 1
rob73 New MDD (European Medical Device Regulations) next steps - 2016 EU Medical Device Regulations 1
L Where next? Thinking outside the QMS box Career and Occupation Discussions 9
C Quality Assurance Manager ? Next Steps? Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 10
B Chi-square test - What do I do next? Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 2
S QSB+ revoked - Notify registrar, what's next? Customer and Company Specific Requirements 3
hogheavenfarm Suggestions for next Professional Certification Professional Certifications and Degrees 11
S What are the next steps after providing response to FDA 483 ? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 7
P Do CQE exam questions repeat in next exams? Professional Certifications and Degrees 1
B Anyone Attending OTC next week in Houston? (Offshore Technology Confernce) Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 0
T FDA Form 483 Warning Letter - What next? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 7
S Delegation of Response to Next Level ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
K Building Heavy Pollution Factory next to Medical Device Factory (ISO 13485) ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
S Update from Australia and NZ regulatory bodies - ANZTPA in next 5 years Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
W ISO 9001 Certified - Active Six Sigma - What Next? Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 25
F Career Problem - Industrial design, QA, what next? Career and Occupation Discussions 5
somashekar Supply Chain Oversight is the FDA's Next Area of Concern Other US Medical Device Regulations 0
F What's the next step after failing an AQL? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 7
E What's next after all the certificates and awards? (e.g.: ISO 9001, ISO 1400, etc.) Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 1
B The next (5th) revision of ISO 9001 - When available? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
K Procedures and Quality Manual written - Where next? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 14
L Calibration - Buying New Tools - How do you determine the next calibration date? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 12
xcanals_tecno-med.es MDD 93/42 as amended by dir 2007/47 in force next week (21 mars) EU Medical Device Regulations 2
N What sampling plan should I use for the next lot. Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 2
O Need to Create Macros so that it can copy data to the next row.... Excel .xls Spreadsheet Templates and Tools 5
C What is the next ISO 9001? 9001:2009 or 9001:2014 or? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
P PMA called for a class III-510(k)..what next? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 4
K Status of ISO 17025 (Next Revision, Which Committee does it?) ISO 17025 related Discussions 2
Wes Bucey If you get laid off this Friday, what's next? Career and Occupation Discussions 12
L SC in a circle next to feature box - Is this "Statistical Control" Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 17

Similar threads

Top Bottom