N
Re: Re: Here's mine
Crow, Smow, Craig. Get over yourself & don't take it so personal. You must be in the .33% that truly is an effective agent. I've seen your posts and I am on your side. In my travels, however, especially in automotive, this has not been the case. I am a huge proponent of expanding knowledge. However, effective systems are built outside of a 4 hour exam on Saturday morning. When "colleagues" adorn themselves with acronyms, yet are incapable of determining the root cause of a basic sympton, whats the point ? When they spout off Cpk and Sigma yet couldn't instruct another on what it is, how to calculate it or how to use it, tis a waste. Acronyms in a lot of cases carry the same weight as the holy registration banner flying out front. I prefer results, and if results are gained whilst one totes certification along, great. But, in my 12 years that is the exception. (and, so I can remain somewhat effective, I'll no longer pursue the dreaded MBA....... and you, please stop at 2 !
) Have a day ! 
Craig H. said:
nobox, this generalization is completely out of line, IMO. Someone attaining certification means they have worked to expand their knowledge. You know, to improve themselves (get it???).
Since you really didn't provide much info, I can't compare my quality system to yours, but I suspect you would end up chewing those words like so much crow.
Craig, CQM, CQE
P.S. Does 2 acronyms mean I am not able? HA!!!!
Since you really didn't provide much info, I can't compare my quality system to yours, but I suspect you would end up chewing those words like so much crow.
Craig, CQM, CQE
P.S. Does 2 acronyms mean I am not able? HA!!!!
) Have a day ! 