The Weekly Roundup - May 3

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#1
========================================================
THE LINUX REPORT InfoWorld.com
========================================================
May 3, 2000

THE LATEST IN LINUX FROM INFOWORLD:

SOURCE CODE DOESN'T KILL COMPETITION IN THE SOFTWARE INDUSTRY, PEOPLE KILL
COMPETITION

Posted at Apr 28, 2000 01:01 PM

THE OPEN-SOURCE world seems to be divided into at least two camps: the religious and the pragmatic. To the former group, proprietary and closed-source code are evil. The latter group sees proprietary and closed-source code as benign and even occasionally necessary.

Let me point out that free software (as in free speech) and open source are not synonymous. I can give away source code and forbid you to use it without permission. Nor are proprietary and closed source synonymous, though one usually implies the other.

Regardless, I'm in the latter group. To me, proprietary and closed-source code are like guns. One can use a gun to protect oneself against evil people, or one can use it to murder rivals. But in the latter case it is the murderer who is evil, not the gun.

I will agree with the religious zealots on one very important point. The world of commercial and free software is definitely engaged in a war of good and evil. And the obvious examples of evil that one can cite usually involve closed-source code.

Open-source advocates tend to point to Microsoft as evidence of the evils of closed source. But for all we know, Microsoft could also be using open source as a weapon. It is entirely possible that large portions of Windows 2000 have been lifted from programs that are protected under the GNU GPL (General Public License). The fact that GPL code is freely available makes it that much easier for a company such as Microsoft to steal it. Does that make GPL evil? Of course not.

Now before you Microsoft stockholders get your panties in a knot, I am not accusing the company of stealing GPL code. If anything, the evidence points to the contrary. If Microsoft made it a practice to steal GPL code, it would be more likely to meet projected ship dates.

I also don't mean to imply that individuals at Microsoft are dishonest about their motives. At worst Microsoft officials are simply misquoted. Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer, for example, was recently misquoted as saying, "I feel deeply that we behaved in every instance with super integrity." The reporters might have gotten it right if they heard him whisper afterward, "Most of the time, it was soup."

Open, closed, proprietary, and free source are weapons wielded by both sides and are not in and of themselves good nor evil.

These matters are currently close to my heart, because I work with Linux Standard Base (LSB). I want to make it clear that it is by no means the goal of LSB to encourage the use of proprietary software. But as we get nearer to completion of the LSB specification, it occurs to me that, as a side effect, LSB could encourage the use of proprietary software.

One of the goals of LSB is to allow Linux providers to differentiate their products without breaking application compatibility. LSB is concerned only with the layer above the Linux kernel that determines whether an application will install and run properly. The point is to enable customers to choose the Linux distribution that best suits their needs without fear that they will encounter problems running their favorite applications.

LSB can best achieve its goals if the software LSB deals with is open-source. The best way to guarantee a level playing field is by ensuring that there are no secrets in the layer of software that determines whether an application will be compatible across Linux distributions.

But if you think about it, the implication is that it is therefore nonthreatening to have proprietary software outside the scope of LSB. For example, one can write a proprietary, closed-source installation program for Linux without creating an imbalance in the Linux market. You can't assert control over the Linux standard with a proprietary installation program. Once you've got an LSB-compliant Linux installed, the proprietary installation program becomes irrelevant. You can still run any LSB-compliant applications.

So my advice to the open-source community is to focus on what really matters. Fight the good fight when open source creates a level playing field. And relax when proprietary source code is nonthreatening. That will ensure the continued success of both open and closed source.

Nicholas Petreley is the founding editor of LinuxWorld and a contributing editor for InfoWorld. He works with LSB. Reach him at [email protected]

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

QUOTE OF THE DAY:

"You'll see them [Microsoft] fight the breakup through the judge's decision this summer and when push comes to shove, you will see them capitulate and try to become heroes. They aren't dumb, and all their best advisers on this are telling them this is the best thing for them to do."

--A consultant who requested anonymity.
http://www.infoworld.com/articles/pi/xml/00/04/28/000428pidoj.xml

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Copyright 2000 InfoWorld Media Group Inc.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Marc The Weekly Roundup - May 31, 2000 After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 0
Marc The Weekly Roundup - May 17, 2000 After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 0
Marc The Weekly Roundup - May 24, 2000 After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 0
Marc The Weekly Roundup - May 10 After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 0
Marc The Weekly Roundup - June 28, 2000 After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 0
Marc The Weekly Roundup - June 21, 2000 After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 0
Marc The Weekly Roundup - June 14, 2000 After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 0
Marc The Weekly Roundup - Wednesday, June 7, 2000 After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 0
Marc The Weekly Roundup - April 26 After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 0
Marc The Weekly Roundup - April 19 After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 0
Marc The Weekly Roundup - March 29 After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 0
Marc The Weekly Roundup - March 22 After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 0
Marc The Weekly Roundup - 12 Apr After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 0
Marc The Weekly Roundup After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 0
Marc The Linux Weekly Roundup After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 0
Marc The Linux Weekly Roundup After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 0
Marc Weekly Roundup - THE LINUX REPORT - January 19, 2000 After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 0
Marc The Linux Weekly Roundup After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 0
Marc The Linux Weekly Roundup After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 1
Marc The Linux Weekly Roundup After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 1
Marc Linux Weekly Roundup After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 3
M Establishing a QMS - What Daily/Weekly/Monthly activities in Auto Industry IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
B Quality Manager Weekly Report Template Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 7
F Save Excel file with Date for Recording Weekly Test Samples Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 11
B Weekly Quality Topics - A basic quality primer Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 3
Claes Gefvenberg Weekly picture: The little things... Imported Legacy Blogs 1
Claes Gefvenberg Weekly picture Imported Legacy Blogs 3
M Control Chart for Dependent obs - One factor for each category weekly Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 7
J What should be covered in weekly Staff Meetings? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 30
K Records - Are weekly purchasing reports, backlog reports, etc., Quality Records? Records and Data - Quality, Legal and Other Evidence 4
I Weekly or monthly brief Quality Topics or short power point presentations Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 2
S I'm required to conduct weekly training but I'm burning out - Your ideas? Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 35
P Humidity not recorded weekly - How would you Correct it? Nonconformance and Corrective Action 15
Marc The Weekly Linux Report After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 1
D Does Manufacture can submit CE mark application under MDD with NB for his New product after May 2020? EU Medical Device Regulations 3
dgrainger Informational UK guidance on FSNs - May 2020 EU Medical Device Regulations 1
dgrainger Informational UK guidance on FSNs - Published 20 May 2020 Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 1
GStough WCQI Virtual Conference May 6, 2020 Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 1
C Critical Suppliers for EU medical device approvals May 2020 EU Medical Device Regulations 1
Z Role of economic operators (EO) post the EU MDR Date of application in May 2020 EU Medical Device Regulations 1
M Informational US FDA – URGENT/11 Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities in a Widely-Used Third-Party Software Component May Introduce Risks During Use of Certain Medical Dev Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
D MDD Certification Validity after May 2020 EU Medical Device Regulations 12
M Informational Some things the EU MDR 2017/745 does not tell you, but you may need to know to comply with it effectively – Part 1 Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
K EU MDD Class I Device market access / certification after 26th May 2020 EU Medical Device Regulations 9
M Informational BSI – ISO 13485 and products with May 2020 deadline for MDR certification Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
L Dying a slow SCOPE death - NEW ISO APG Paper on Scope and Applicability May 2020. AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
Marc FDA safety scandal: 50K hidden reports of heart device malfunctioning - May 2019 Other US Medical Device Regulations 2
Marc Problem with 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) sub-forum link - 2 May 2019 Elsmar Cove Forum Suggestions, Complaints, Problems and Bug Reports 1
Marc The 500th Anniversary of Leonardo da Vinci who died in May 1519 World News 1
Jane's You may or may not have the same person managing Operations and QA ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 18

Similar threads

Top Bottom