Thoughts on managing ISO 9001, 13485, IATF 16949 and 17025

SGquality

Quite Involved in Discussions
#1
Hello members,

Need your thoughts on this complex situation -

currently, the company has four different divisions managing ISO 13485, ISO 9001, IATF 16949, and ISO/IEC 17025 certificates and quality management system. Now this company is planning to have a "centralized quality systems" to manage these four QMS.

I would like to know how would you approach this situation?

Thank you in advance
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Ninja

Looking for Reality
Trusted Information Resource
#3
Not a huge deal...just a lot of review and tweaking...assuming they want ONE QMS to comply with all four.
Totally easy if they want one storage system for the four separate QMS's.

Assuming they want to merge into one system:
Each and every process/document/etc. needs to be reviewed "four times"...not really four times, but "Are we handling ISO9001 requirements? ...Are we handling IATF requirements?...etc"

Being detailly like I am, I would likely review (or have reviewed) literally four times with different mindsets day by day...but that's me.

If they just want central storage, but four different QMS's...it's simply record tagging as you load the systems into the central database...and careful access privilege management based on those tags.

Don't get me wrong...it's a LOT of work moving things like that around, and moreso if you try to have each process comply with all four systems.
But I have yet to see a case where one system requires a thing, and another prohibits it... you may just find yourself doing a lot of needless work, such as applying stricter IATF requirements to a part going to mass market (non-auto) that does not require them.
 

SGquality

Quite Involved in Discussions
#4
Great points Ninja. :agree:

@ Johnny Quality, its just a thought for the moment and needs crystallization.

Probably we might go with four different sets of QMS documents for each of the standards, but I am leaning towards having a tiered approach where certain elements like Management Review, CAPA, nonconforming materials, to name a few, might be common across all standards while specific ones like DMR, DHR will be for ISO 13485; APQP, PPAP for IATF, and so on. Thus, if the Tier 1 is the Quality manual, Tier 2 would be the QMS common elements, Tier 3 industry-specific elements, Tier 4 work instructions, and Tier 5 will be Forms. A lot of this is still on the drawing board but was very keen on getting thoughts from esteemed members here.

The "centralized quality system group" will be responsible for establishing the documentation required for establishing the requirements, while the execution will rest with the different business entities.

Currently I am just supporting the ISO 13485 but the company wants me to lead this effort.
 

Ninja

Looking for Reality
Trusted Information Resource
#6
Gonna change your wording, since how you wrote it will lead to future headaches... it is a distinct and significant alteration in thought and approach.
May work in your company, may not...I hope it does.

The "centralized quality system group" will be responsible for reviewing and giving feedback/required changes to the documentation written by the process owners required for establishing the requirements, while the execution will rest with the different business entities.
Some central group who doesn't make stuff...writing the documents around how stuff is made... that's why folks hate "the quality department idiots who keep telling me to do things that make no sense in the real world".
Don't do that...have the process owners lay out the process...the "Central Committee" just needs to make sure that the final product satisfies the standards. And yes, you will be viewed as "The Central Committee" and all it implies.
 

Big Jim

Super Moderator
#8
I wrote an manual a few years ago for a company that maintained ISO 9001:2015, AS9100D, and ISO 13484:2015. They wanted one manual, one system, auditors be damned. Their words, not mine. First I wrote a manual for ISO 9001:2015 & AS9100D. Not that difficult as they use the same numbering system. Then I added in the 13485 requirements after determining where they fit in to ISO 9001 since 13485 stayed behind and is numbered like ISO 9001:2008. Notes in parenthesis showed which standard was being addressed. Also a cross reference was created for the 13485 auditor so he could find his way around.

16945 also uses the same numbering system as ISO 9001:2015 so it too could be mixed in, however it has a lot more enhancements, but it is doable.

17025 is a completely different animal. It is too different to mix into the others. I think you will still need at least two manuals.
 

John Broomfield

Staff member
Super Moderator
#9
Just describe how your organization works as a system to fulfill requirements to the extent necessary for effective planning, operation and control.

Do this to make life easier for the users not the auditors.

Then add a matrix (as an appendix) for each standard that relates the relevant part of the system to each clause in the standard.

Job done.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
N Looking to Impress - New Job - Advice, Thoughts, Comments Welcome Career and Occupation Discussions 23
T Internal Nonconformance procedure thoughts (AS9100) AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 6
S Inventory Control - Any thoughts would be appreciated ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
S Proposed Quality Improvement - Thoughts? Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 3
E Discussion between co-worker on tolerance and uncertainty and how to apply it. Thoughts? 17025 ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
D ASQ CMQ/OE Certification - Share your thoughts ASQ - American Society for Quality 3
Marc Thoughts about the vBulletin to Xenforo Software Migration - 2 October 2018 Forum News and General Information 4
J MDR reporting and CAPA thoughts? Classifying Complaints on Risk 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 13
Q Thoughts on Communications relevant to the Quality Management System ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
K Thoughts on the impact of the General Data Protection Regulation? Medical Information Technology, Medical Software and Health Informatics 5
B Thoughts on performing an ISO 9001:2015 Remote Internal Audit ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 8
Marc Thoughts about Extrapolating Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 5
Marc Your thoughts? A weekend calibration teaser General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 7
Marc Thoughts about Discussion Forums Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 2
S Destructive Gage RR - Using Crossed - want your thoughts Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 18
Marc Thoughts for Food - What's on the menu? Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 3
D Thoughts on the Implementation and Effectiveness of A3 methodology Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 2
Antonio Vieira Thoughts on implementation of Quality Management System in a Police Department ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 32
W Thoughts on having Safety Shower in ISO Class 7 Cleanroom ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
C Thoughts on validation of Legacy Systems for Medical Device Software EU Medical Device Regulations 2
T Need thoughts on calibration of Class A volumetric glassware General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
Marc About 1940 to today - TV - Sunday Morning Thoughts Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 5
G Thoughts on Audit Finding for not doing Gage R and R for Visual Inspection Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 8
Sean Kelley What are your thoughts on Process vs Product Control Plans ? FMEA and Control Plans 3
N Improvement in a Medical Plastics Compounder Job Shop - Any thoughts? Preventive Action and Continuous Improvement 14
B Your thoughts on Communicating to Customers the Actions on Customer Survey Customer Complaints 4
Steve Prevette Tom Peters thoughts on Six Sigma, ISO Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 5
N Quantifying our QMS Objectives - Your Thoughts ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
Jerry Eldred New ILAC Requirements Regarding Repeatability - Your thoughts on this please Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 11
Marc Thoughts and Opinions about the ASQ (American Society for Quality) ASQ, ANAB, UKAS, IAF, IRCA, Exemplar Global and Related Organizations 34
Richard Regalado ISO 27001 Statement of Applicability and Some of my Thoughts IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 4
bobdoering Dr Wheeler gives his thoughts on "Estimating the Fraction Nonconforming" Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 0
bobdoering Dr. Wheeler is back with his thoughts on MSA and Gage R&R Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
C ISO 27001 and Bulk Email Policy - Your Thoughts, Please IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 3
jasonb067 Cognos Feedback - Cognos BI software from IBM - What your thoughts? After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 4
C Organization unsure about the ISO 9001 implementation route? Share your thoughts. ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 20
Hershal Memorial Day thoughts - 2010 Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 1
5 What are your thoughts on my NPD (New Product Development) process map? Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 17
A What are you thoughts on the 1.5 sigma shift Six Sigma 3
R Considering adding ISO 13485 certification - Your thoughts? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 4
I Seeking thoughts on using BOTH FTA (Fault Tree Analysis) and FMEA ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 17
D KAIZEN Event "tools to use" Brain Jogger - Your thoughts please Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 12
P Are they "Satisfying Customer Requirements?" - Thoughts and Comments Customer Complaints 1
Paul Simpson ISO 19011 revision - Your thoughts General Auditing Discussions 53
P ISO 9001 in construction organization: Your thoughts (quality control plan, etc) ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
Marc Your Opinions and thoughts about the Elsmar Cove forum - Why do you visit the forum? Forum News and General Information 50
Marc Thoughts about (the murder of) Manufacturing In the US Imported Legacy Blogs 2
M Non Conformance Reports - What are your thoughts on the title? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 14
michellemmm Thoughts on issuing a CAR for Operator Error General Auditing Discussions 15
C Thoughts on benefits and drawbacks of having QC and QA go from 1 head to 2? Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 3

Similar threads

Top Bottom