Hi all,
I got a question from the notified body, asking what are the EDOs (essential design outputs) of my product and the evidence that these outputs are in control. The EDOs should be traced to min. 1 EPR (essential performance requirement). I intend to do the follwing steps:
* Identify the EPRs from the product requirements (PRs) by mean of the CTQ (the CTQ is a 6-sigma methodology. Therefore, I need to implement the design control elments in this). As EPRs are a part of the PRs --> the EPRs will automatically be verified.
* Identify the EDOs by mean of the dFMEA and pFMEA (with high risk evaluation values).
* Trace the EDOs back to the EPRs.
* When conducting the process validation, use EPRs and their specifications as the minimum requirements of the product that need for the process validation (in OQ and PQ).
* Include the EPRs and their specifications in the release control requirement specification.
All this will be included in the Design Transfer process.
Is it an appropriate way to show that the EDOs are in control? Are there anyone, who got the same question from the authorities and what did you provide to them as the evidence?
Thank you very much for your help.
I got a question from the notified body, asking what are the EDOs (essential design outputs) of my product and the evidence that these outputs are in control. The EDOs should be traced to min. 1 EPR (essential performance requirement). I intend to do the follwing steps:
* Identify the EPRs from the product requirements (PRs) by mean of the CTQ (the CTQ is a 6-sigma methodology. Therefore, I need to implement the design control elments in this). As EPRs are a part of the PRs --> the EPRs will automatically be verified.
* Identify the EDOs by mean of the dFMEA and pFMEA (with high risk evaluation values).
* Trace the EDOs back to the EPRs.
* When conducting the process validation, use EPRs and their specifications as the minimum requirements of the product that need for the process validation (in OQ and PQ).
* Include the EPRs and their specifications in the release control requirement specification.
All this will be included in the Design Transfer process.
Is it an appropriate way to show that the EDOs are in control? Are there anyone, who got the same question from the authorities and what did you provide to them as the evidence?
Thank you very much for your help.