Traceability - Semiconductor supplement

M

Michel Saad

#1
In the semiconductor supplement, under element 4.8 it is stated:

"The supplier shall be able to trace product (incoming,inprocess and shipped materials and test data) fowards and backwards within 24 hours. In addition, the supplier shall provide containement within 24 hours"

Does this mean that we have to be able to do a full traceability from raw materials to shipping within 24 hours after the customer contacts us?

Unless I am missing something, why should the semiconductor world be expected to respond faster than the rest?

24 working hours (3 days) or 24 real hours?

We archive our system every 6 months, then traceability can take up to 5 working days to retreive.

I need help in interpreting and understanding this requirement. Any input is welcome.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
L

lyman

#2
The QS9K registrar we used looked at whether we could really meet the 24 hr (real hours) requirement. Luckily, our computerized system was well backed up and the IT department had the 24 hr requirement written in their working documents as well so expectations were well defined, understood and planned for. The computerized manufacturing system was set up to trace lot id and history from raw wafer start through off shore assembly. Our registrar questioned availability of histories on the week-end or evenings knowing that the IT department was 8-5 (M-F) - we had a couple of responses:

1) Prior to archival of the electronic record - all Fab personnel were trained to pull lot histories. All supervisory, management personnel were trained to pull specific histories (part id, family ids, yield info, etc.) so this information could be pulled 24 hrs a day.

2) Once archival occurred the records could be retrieved through IT - since they always had someone on call, if we had an emergency they would come in on their off hours. However, the reality was most of our customers were pretty much 8-5 M-F kinda guys and we didn't hear from them other than on those days. However, the assembly sites were a whole different animal and we usually would get someone in on emergency notice if the records were archived, and we had the possiblity of going line down.

3) Don't forget the Supplement also allows for modification of the time period by negotiating with the customer. However, I seriously doubt that any customer will buy a 5 day delay - don't forget the notice should also start the clock for containment of a possible larger issue.

Regards



[This message has been edited by lyman (edited 19 May 2000).]
 

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#3
The 24 hours was set in part because of the possible critical nature of ICs in cars today as I understand it. I do know Motorola and other 'biggies' participated intimately in the last revision of the supplement.

During Motorola's registration audit in Guadalajara it took less than 8 hours, as I remember. The auditors came in at 11 PM and 'started the clock'.
 
M

Michel Saad

#4
I appreciate the information. Am I to understand that the during the audit, we will have to perform a full traceability within 24 hours. Starting on every shift or day shift only?

Susan, did you have to do this?
 

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#5
They can say "Start!" at any time of day or night if you're running 24/7. As I said above, in one audit they arrived unannounced (well, several folks in upper management knew when it would happen then but the plant was not as a whole advised) at 11 PM (two days into a 4 day audit - 4 auditors) and said: "Start Now!"

I can't say if you're not running 24/7 - haven't had that situation to address.

[This message has been edited by Marc Smith (edited 23 May 2000).]
 
L

lyman

#6
Michel

As Marc said the clock should start at notice: day, night, or weekend. I was at Motorola/ Phoenix and we ran 24/7 also, our registrar's auditors didn't come in at night to test the system. However, we did have occasion to get requests from the assembly sites and we needed to produce the evidence and start containment once we received notice. Of course, urgency and response is much more dependent upon whether your part initiates the airbag or the radio. I do remember that the some of the semiconductor groups originally separated response time to issues based on whether or not it was an external (e.g., assembly site, end line customer) vs an internal (next in line process) customer - external receiving higher priority. However, the groups were moving to applying the same standard to all customers - containment in 24 hrs or less, initial response to customer in 48 hr or less, corrective action within 10 working days (this figure probably has been reduced by now). I cannot speak to anything but a 24/7 operation, haven't seen a 8/5 in a long time in the semiconductor world.

Regards
 

Marc

Hunkered Down for the Duration
Staff member
Admin
#7
Were you in Phoenix during the winter/spring registration (1998)?

Is it On-Semi now?

Did you know Leon Humble?
 
M

Michel Saad

#8
Susan,

Thanks for the input. We are running 24/7 and we do have a computerized production system. Anything on the production line is easy. We have people on call as well. One of the issues is that we are on the east coast. Many of our customers and suppliers are on the west (2 to 3 hour difference)and most of our assembly sub-contractors are in asia (12,13 hour time difference). Getting data (or containement) from everyone and getting back to the customer within 24 hours sound difficult. We better start figuring something out unless we can get a waiver from our customer.
 
L

lyman

#9
Marc:

I was there - still have the stress lines to prove it as I was part of the Zener/ Rectifier Wafer Fab - voted most likely to torpedo registration efforts!! The company is now ON. I didn't know Leon, but worked with and have great respect for Angel Cifuentes whom I'm sure you got to know down in Guad.

Michel:

I've learned that time is relative in the semiconductor world - if they want to reach you they will and the response is always due two days ago!

Regards all around

[This message has been edited by lyman (edited 23 May 2000).]
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
T ISO 9001 8.5.2. - Identification and traceability to Identify Outputs - Services ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
S IATF 16949 - Partial traceability of Aftermarket products IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
R DHR question: Traceability of components ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
A Does AS9100 require traceability to operators performing the work? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 4
J Traceability of component parts - Bolts, screws and washers ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
R Traceability on Unmarked Parts - AS9100 requirements AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 7
T Non conformance product identification and traceability 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 4
B Traceability of Thermoelement Batches ISO 17025 related Discussions 7
G ISO 17025:2017 Uninterrupted chain of traceability for test laboratories ISO 17025 related Discussions 6
J What is the minimum standard for automotive component traceability? Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
A Validation of Calibration Methods and Traceability - ISO 17025 ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
shimonv Design input/output traceability for mechanical parts ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 13
K Identification and Traceability with an ERP system - Barcode Labels? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
B PED 2014/68/EU - Is this Traceability audit finding correct? Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 4
N FDA Traceability Requirements - Component lots ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
Stefan Mundt ISO 9001:2015 - 8.5.2 Identification and Traceability Manufacturing and Related Processes 14
S How to maintain a design traceability matrix ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
N Requirements for the identification and traceability of demo product for sales force US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
MrTetris Traceability in Medical Sofware Development Process IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 3
M Medical Device Traceability ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
G Where to list chain of traceability? ISO 17025 related Discussions 6
A AS5553B Counterfeit Prevention - Traceability requirements AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 10
T In house Calibration? Measurement equipment traceability requirements - ISO9001 General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 12
R ISO 9001:2015 Clause 7.1.5.2 - Is Measurement traceability applicable? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 1
M Medical Device Traceability Matrix - Examples EU Medical Device Regulations 8
DeeDeeM IATF16949, clause 8.5.2.1 Identification and traceability-supplemental IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 1
DeeDeeM IATF 16949 - Clause 8.5.2 Identification and Traceability IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
D IATF 16949 - 8.5.2.1 Traceability Plan - Does anyone have an example? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
A UDI - Traceability of Products Other US Medical Device Regulations 1
B AS9100 Rev D - Traceability of Consumables AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 4
J Customer Identification and Traceability in Manufacturing Plans Manufacturing and Related Processes 5
S Traceability and the initiation of GMP Activities 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 6
N Calibration Traceability - Fluke 753 dpc with thermocouple Calibrated by Fluke ISO 17025 related Discussions 4
T Policy or Good Guidance for a Traceability Decision Tree (Serial and Batch Numbers) Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 4
J How to understand IATF 16949 Clause 8.5.2.1 - Traceability IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
A Aluminum Die Casting Product Traceability Manufacturing and Related Processes 10
G Traceability - Checklist from NIST General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4
Raffy ISO 13485 NIST Traceability requirements for calibration of test equipment ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
G Traceability of laser based x-y measuring machine General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5
A Power Traceability certificate for values for voltage, current and phase General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
Q Allowed no manuals, technical instructions traceability in products ISO 9001? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 7
A Is NIST traceability required if a Refractometer calibration is done in-house? Calibration Frequency (Interval) 6
M Component Lot Number Traceability - Class I reusable and "resposable" Medical Devices ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 10
B What is the FDA guidance regarding selling replacement parts and traceability? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
J Individual part traceability - ink/paint sprayer? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
A Active Implantable Medical Devices - Legal Traceability Requirements ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 7
M Establishing traceability from calibrated glassware to non calibrated ones General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 5
M Traceability of Tissue Samples US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
R Drilling Service Identification and Traceability Requirements Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 4
G Required Chains Identification for Traceability Calibration and Metrology Software and Hardware 3

Similar threads

Top Bottom