Hi everyone,
Tried to find a previous thread for this question, but no luck. If you know there is one, please let me know
I am facing a difficult discussing with one of our suppliers (and legal manufacturer) concerning the label for a Class IIb device.
As I have understood, and whatever info I find, ALL text content in both IFU and label needs to be translated to languages required? Or have I missed out on anything?
The label contains of applicable symbols, but also some text describing compatibility, lengths such as “For use with XXX monitors, XXX and instrument licenced to use XXX sensors”, also “Applied part: BF or CF, depending on the host device”
I have tried to refer to several articles/paragraphs in MDR, guidance document ect an that this information shall be stated in the IFU. But we do not agree upon that the text should either be translated or symbols shall be used to demonstrate the indication/meaning.
Am I wrong?
Tried to find a previous thread for this question, but no luck. If you know there is one, please let me know
I am facing a difficult discussing with one of our suppliers (and legal manufacturer) concerning the label for a Class IIb device.
As I have understood, and whatever info I find, ALL text content in both IFU and label needs to be translated to languages required? Or have I missed out on anything?
The label contains of applicable symbols, but also some text describing compatibility, lengths such as “For use with XXX monitors, XXX and instrument licenced to use XXX sensors”, also “Applied part: BF or CF, depending on the host device”
I have tried to refer to several articles/paragraphs in MDR, guidance document ect an that this information shall be stated in the IFU. But we do not agree upon that the text should either be translated or symbols shall be used to demonstrate the indication/meaning.
Am I wrong?