SBS - The best value in QMS software

TS 16949 8.5.2 Corrective Action - Auditor did not like the customer related form

J

jbGUERRA

#1
One of our distribution centers called fuming over a Minor nonconformance during a TS16949 surveillance regarding 8.5.2 Corrective action.

The auditor did not like the customer related form they were using or the format they used to record electronic files, and the corrective action documents did not meet her expectation of defining the root cause.

The quality representative at our distribution center is following the customer guides lines for reporting root cause analysis as well as, meeting our internal procedure.

Did the auditor over step her boundaries and can we dispute the Minor nonconformance and reduce it down to at least an opportunity for improvement?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
R

ralphsulser

#2
Another possibility is to combine what you customer wants with what the auditor is looking for. Maybe just add to your existing form. If you can do that it will eliminate the hassle, and satisfy each.
 
J

jbGUERRA

#3
8.5.2 corrective action

are you saying we should change our procedures and documents to meet the mood of the auditor eventhough, we meet the requirements of the element with documentation and zero rejections from our customer concerning our corrective action submissions along with changes to our PFMEA's and control plans adding error proofing/poke-yoke methods to address root cause issues?

You lost me!
 
R

ralphsulser

#4
No, I am not saying you should change every related document.
You initially stated it was the form that was an issue with the auditor.
At least that's what I understood as a form only NC
 

Howard Atkins

Forum Administrator
Staff member
Admin
#5
jbGUERRA said:
One of our distribution centers called fuming over a Minor nonconformance during a TS16949 surveillance regarding 8.5.2 Corrective action.

The auditor did not like the customer related form they were using or the format they used to record electronic files, and the corrective action documents did not meet her expectation of defining the root cause.

The quality representative at our distribution center is following the customer guides lines for reporting root cause analysis as well as, meeting our internal procedure.

Did the auditor over step her boundaries and can we dispute the Minor nonconformance and reduce it down to at least an opportunity for improvement?

ISO/TS 16949 said:
8.5.2.1 Problem solving
The organization shall have a defined process for problem solving leading to root cause identification and elimination.
If a customer-prescribed problem-solving format exists, the organization shall use the prescribed format.
I cannot see how there can be a NC for using a customer form
But just because they used the internal procedures that does not mean that everything is OK, maybe your procedure does not meet the requirements of the standard and this is what the NC means

jbGUERRA said:
or the format they used to record electronic files,
This seems to be a separate issue and is not covered by customer format
 

bpritts

Involved - Posts
#6
If I stretch, I can picture a situation where this could happen, and be appropriate. IF (A) the customer's format does not "effectively" determine root cause and a systemic corrective action plan; and (B) you have no other means to do so, then a CAR is appropriate. The issue in (A) may very well be a subjective call.

A possible solution is to use your internal CAR format in these cases (you must have one to handle customers who don't have a form?),
for those customers whose CAR's don't fully diagnose root cause. I would, of course, still send the customer their format.

I have the opposite problem... one of my client's big customers uses a CAR form that's so complex, none of us can effectively use it. So we use an 8D form internally, then generate their format separately.

Regards,
Brad
 

Cari Spears

Super Moderator
Staff member
Super Moderator
#7
jbGUERRA said:
The auditor did not like the customer related form they were using or the format they used to record electronic files, and the corrective action documents did not meet her expectation of defining the root cause.

The quality representative at our distribution center is following the customer guides lines for reporting root cause analysis as well as, meeting our internal procedure.
Please forgive me - it's early and I'm only halfway through with my coffee - but when you say "customer related form" do you mean it is the document the customer gave them to use? And, what is the "format they used to record electronic files"? And, which corrective action documents did not meet her expectation of defining root cause: a customer supplied document or their own internal document?
 
K

Kevin H

#8
I'm with Cari on this one. Your description of the problem does not adequately convey enough detail to me to allow a good comment on the issues. From your description, I suspect part of the problem that you're using customer specified formats that the auditor does not like. It would help to attach copies of the forms for mutiple analysis/review by the cove members.
 
R

Randy Stewart

#9
Reporting and identifying Root Cause are two totally different items. There is no NC in "Reporting" root cause in the customer format, however, if the process for "Identifying" root cause is not a logical process or does not tie up loose ends, then your auditor may have noticed something.

As was stated in a previous post, if the people interviewed did not have answers on how root cause was identified then you leave yourself open for NC's. To often you find companys that will adopt a process or methodology (because their customer uses it) that they really don't understand.

I have not seen the write up so I'm going off the info given. Yes, there are auditors out there that will issue NC's because they don't like or agree with how you are doing things, they don't seem to last too long. Look at the processes you mention, evaluate the interviews that the auditor conducted and look through auditor glasses and see if you can detect the same issue.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Helmut Jilling

Auditor / Consultant
#10
jbGUERRA said:
One of our distribution centers called fuming over a Minor nonconformance during a TS16949 surveillance regarding 8.5.2 Corrective action.

The auditor did not like the customer related form they were using or the format they used to record electronic files, and the corrective action documents did not meet her expectation of defining the root cause.

The quality representative at our distribution center is following the customer guides lines for reporting root cause analysis as well as, meeting our internal procedure.

Did the auditor over step her boundaries and can we dispute the Minor nonconformance and reduce it down to at least an opportunity for improvement?

1. I agree, I don't see how there can be a NC for using a customer form, unless it was used incorrectly.

2. How can a distribution center be certified to TS-16949? A DC does not meet the applicability requirements for a "Manufacturing site." Generally, they must be registered to ISO 9001. I believe IAOB does not recognize it. Any thoughts, Sidney?
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
S Can we provide training plan as corrective action for IATF 16949 Non conformity? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9
R Corrective Action for Nonconformity in ISO/TS 16949 Recertification Audit IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
M TS 16949 clause 8.5.2 - Corrective Action - Need to some clarifications IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
A TS 16949 Type of Corrective and Preventative Action Procedure wanted Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 3
C Corrective action in control plan per Annex A of ISO/ TS 16949: 2002 standard FMEA and Control Plans 4
A TS 16949 Corrective Action Impact - Difference between Preventive Action and CI? Nonconformance and Corrective Action 7
S TS 16949 - 8.5.2.4 - When are Corrective Actions required IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
A Control plans - TS 16949:2002 requires corrective actions to be addressed FMEA and Control Plans 21
O Informational Ford Motor Company Customer Specific Requirements for IATF 16949:2016 - 08 Jan 2021 Customer and Company Specific Requirements 0
B Updated IATF 16949 - Will IATF 16949 get revised when ISO 9001:202X is released? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
O Release of Sanctioned Interpretations (SIs) related to Rules 5th Edition and Sanctioned Interpretations related to IATF 16949:2016 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 0
S Thoughts on managing ISO 9001, 13485, IATF 16949 and 17025 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 33
P IATF 16949 requirement - error-proofing in control plan IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
R IATF 16949 - Outsourcing of internal audits Internal Auditing 10
eule del ayre Documented Information - Periodic Review of Documents? IATF 16949:2016 / ISO 9001:2015 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 34
Crimpshrine13 Laboratory Scope - Calibration vs. Test Methods - IATF 16949 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
earl62 What is the best way to control special characteristics in Control plan? Is it Mandatory to have SPC for IATF 16949? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 12
L IATF 16949 certification costs IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
B FCA US Customer Specific IATF 16949- Critical Characteristics 8.6.2 Customer and Company Specific Requirements 0
B IATF 16949 News Six month extension on all valid IATF 16949 certs IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 10
earl62 IATF 16949 Clause 9.1.1.1 - What is the batch conformance to specification method? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
B FCA US IATF 16949 Customer Requirements updates Customer and Company Specific Requirements 3
S Can assembly manufacturing sub-supplier be certified IATF 16949? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
D IATF 16949 Requirement for CMMI in a Global Company Elsmar Cove Forum Suggestions, Complaints, Problems and Bug Reports 0
M Tips on preparing for IATF 16949 Internal Lead Auditor exam Manufacturing and Related Processes 1
A IATF 16949 4.3.1 - Determining the scope of the quality management system - supplemental IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 9
S Definition of "worldwide" in view of IATF 16949 and Product conformity IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
R Where does IATF 16949 address Process mapping? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
A Document "Correspondence IATF 16949 vs ISO13485" available? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 0
H Remote product audits in Coivd-19 - IATF 16949 9.2.2.4 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
S IATF 16949 - Partial traceability of Aftermarket products IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 5
M IATF 16949 8.5.1.3 Verification of job set-ups - Do we need secondary check? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
C Industrial scales and MSA (IATF 16949 requirement 7.1.5.1.1) IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 30
V Generic IATF 16949 Audit Checklist wanted IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
M Scope of Combined ISO 9001 and IATF 16949 QMS - Non-automotive customers ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
D Postpone IATF 16949 audit due to COVID-19 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 41
J Does anyone have an excel IATF 16949 Internal Audit checklist I could use? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 7
T Reaction Plan To Drive suppliers to IATF 16949 registration IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 6
B IATF 16949 - Is a Deviation required for sample components in a prototype build? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 13
C IATF 16949 - Scope or not? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
L "IATF-Compliant" IATF 16949:2016 certification? What does this mean? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 13
B Go Beyond ISO 9001 WITH IATF 16949 (January 28) [Paid] Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 1
V IATF 16949 8.4.1 Control of externally provided processes, products and services - Should the CB be on our Approved Supplier List? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 10
C Design and implementation of process audits as defined within IATF 16949 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
Q VDA 6.3 questions vs IATF 16949 clauses VDA Standards - Germany's Automotive Standards 0
N IATF 16949:2016 7.1.5.3.2 External Laboratory - How to approve the Testing Laboratory without accreditation scope IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
M IATF 16949 (6.1.1 - Planning and Risk Analysis for a remote site) Process Maps, Process Mapping and Turtle Diagrams 5
D IATF 16949 FAQ 24 (8.4.2.2 Countries of Destination) - How is this actually being interpreted? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 3
Jimmy123 What is the difference between Error Proofing and Controls? ISO/IATF 16949 - Control Plans FMEA and Control Plans 16
P IATF 16949 8.4.2.4 Supplier Monitoring IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2

Similar threads

Top Bottom