TS 16949 Clause 6.2.2.4 - Employee Motivation and Empowerment Procedure

[ralphsulser]

6.2.2.4 Employee motivation and empowerment procedure

Does anyone hae a sample procedure you can e-mail to me showing how you addressed this for TS16949?
I have been unable to shell out the 25 clams, please send to:
[email protected]
Thanks a bunch for helping

 

[tattva]

Motivation & empowerment

HI! Everybody

I´m looking for ideas on employee motivation, we do have a program, but I´d like to know nwe ideas regarding this issue. As far as I know it´s a big thing to have motivated employees.

Can anyone help me out with this matter?


Thanks in advance!


Will

 

[Marc]

Bump. Anyone have one - Ralph has a Courtesy account so he can download and we'd all appreciate it!

 

[Manoj Mathur]

Employee Motivation Procedure

Here it is.
please tell me how it is and How could I can improve it?

[email protected]

 

[Manoj Mathur]

Employee Motivation Procedure

I tried to attach this procedure but after Two unsuccesssful attempt to attach the procedure I gave up.
You can reach me on

[email protected]

 

[Geoff Cotton]

Here's an "extract" from our system. (attached)

Looks simple and satisfied the TS auditor.

 

[howste]

Geoff - it looks like Manoj isn't the only one with problems attaching files here...

I thought I remembered someone posting one a couple of weeks ago, but I haven't been able to find it. Maybe I'm going crazy

 

[SteelWoman]

Has anyone attempted - successfully - to "grandfather" your employees for TS16949? When we first instituted QS we put a grandfather statement in our Training procedure that said if you had the position as of this date (the date we went for QS) you were automatically considered "competent to perform your job." Since we're switching to a new quality system it doesn't make a lot of sense that our employees are suddenly INcompetent, so I'm thinking about a similar grandfather clause?

 

[db]

Has anyone attempted - successfully - to "grandfather" your employees for TS16949? When we first instituted QS we put a grandfather statement in our Training procedure that said if you had the position as of this date (the date we went for QS) you were automatically considered "competent to perform your job." Since we're switching to a new quality system it doesn't make a lot of sense that our employees are suddenly INcompetent, so I'm thinking about a similar grandfather clause?

6.2.2 and 6.2.2.2 both indicate you will determine your competency/training needs. Although I hate to use the term "grandfathered" (my age perhaps?), I see no reason why you cannot simply say that based on a person's job experience, the person is trained/comptent.

6.2.2.4 is a different matter. It really needs to be an ongoing process. Kinda reminds me of the old "quality circles".

 

[SteelWoman]

We've written into our procedure the "ongoing" measure of competency, but I do think I'm going to try the grandfather (db, sorry for the use of that term again! ) clause - see if it flies. I think it should, based on the standard.