TS Supplier wants ?3000 to do APQP!

Stuart Andrews

Involved - Posts
#1
TS Supplier wants £3000 to do APQP!

I have a supplier who is TS 16949 accredited.

Recently we've accepted his quote for business and nearly completed the design stage, which he's bought into. I've come on late with the SQE (STA) support due to my employer not having my resource at the earliest convenience.

Anyway I've gone into the supplier to assist with maturing the part and their process and I've asked them to do APQP for this part and they've told me we'll have to add £3000 (about $30million lol) to the quote if they ave to do APQP.

I thought having TS meant it was a mandatory requirement for them to do APQP. I'm use to working with QS-9000 and will read the TS std within a few weeks to increase my knowledge, but in the interim I would like your thoughts on this.

Anyone?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
#2
APQP at what price

7.3.6.3 states; "The organization shall conform to a product and manufacturing process approval procedure recognized by the customer". (emphasis mine)

The manufacturing process part could be pointing to APQP, rather than just PPAP. However, it makes little difference. If an organization’s customer requires a 5-phase APQP, then it is required. Same applies with PPAP. What TS doesn’t state is that the organization must perform this at their expense! You can charge your customer all you want for the APQP or PPAP process! The question is; will they pay?

As I see it you have three choices. One is the pay the money. The second is to find another supplier, and the third is to drop the requirement. If the supplier is a “mandated” supplier, you might have to get your customer involved.

Hope that helps.
 
S
#4
db said,
"As I see it you have three choices. One is the pay the money. The second is to find another supplier, and the third is to drop the requirement. If the supplier is a “mandated” supplier, you might have to get your customer involved."

I agree. You can not make your supplier responsible for an inadequately prepared RFQ.
 

Stuart Andrews

Involved - Posts
#5
Sam said:
I agree. You can not make your supplier responsible for an inadequately prepared RFQ.
I can agree somewhat with db's comments, but I don't see how a supplier can blame our RFQ that they submitted a quote against as a reason
a) Not to perform some sort of APQP to mature their processes and products correctly, as scrap costs them money as well as us.
and
b) To decide to charge the customer for it, only after it I have pointed it out to them that they need to have performed it to validate their processes are capable etc (in accordance with the requirements of TS 16949 that they signed up to).

If the supplier doesn't perform some sort of APQP how can I as a customer be assured that I am going to receive a product that meets all of my requirements and provides evidence of adequate manufacturing capability. And not just as a first-off declaration on a one page PSW?
 
S
#6
Sorry Stuart I missed that first line that states "I have a supplier who is TS 16949 accredited. "
I think your supplier may be playing a word game or there is some misunderstanding on both sides as to what constitutes palnning.
Those certified to TS2 are required to perform "planning of product realization". Refer to the notes inside and the note outside of the box in 7.1. Each note describes a different method for planning. Remember "NOTES" within the specification are for guidance and clarification of the requirements only. Pay particular attention to the last sentence of 7.1. (Excluding the notes)
 

Paul Simpson

Trusted Information Resource
#7
Just another idea

Hi Stuart,

I can only sympathise. Certainly as part of your Q System development you need to have a word with the people that put the RFQ together but in the short term you may have some joy if you go back to your current supplier and ask them to supply you with evidence of their quality planning process and ask for copies of reports that demonstrate the planning process required under TS (and ISO 9001.2000) is taking place.

They may again come back for cash for this service but you are entitled to ask for it as the company "sells" itself on ISO TS registration and hence has to provide evidence that it carries out the processes it claims to do.

If all else fails complain to their certification body and ask them to investigate and report back to you.
 
C

Commander

#8
it seems to be a missunderstanding here. Being certified against any system does not automatically says that you have to do everything for the customer at no cost at all. Being certified means that you have the ability to performe the steps in the standards not that they are free of charge. It is wrong to think that everything is costless. When you choose a supplier you choose him for 2 things: his ability to performe according to the standard and the price.
If he is certified you expect him to do the APQP and PPAP, and that is correct and you should also expect that. From now it is his responsibility to tell you what the price is. I do not think you should change supplier, because if you do you might find one that will do it for free but not correct (just rush through it). If he says it costs then it propably does so.
 
B

Bill Ryan - 2007

#9
I don't expect my suppliers to follow the APQP manual, per se, if they have an acceptable means of "proving" to me that they have done a thorough job of "protecting" my company. Typically, I (or a fellow "SQE") will work fairly closely with a supplier taking on a new product at the outset and begin backing off as they prove they are capable of meeting our expectations. Communication is the key (as always!!) and the more communication "up front" the better.

All that being said, I fully expect a supplier with the QS or TS banner to have a system in place for "product realization" and I fully expect them to have that system incorporated into the piece price when they quote a part for an automotive application. If they come back "after the fact" and try to tell me it will cost to do something that should be being done anyway, they would not remain a supplier for any longer than it would take to find another. I know that sounds hardline but that's the way it works with us.

One other option is the punitive one the B3 (and some Tier 1s)use - as soon as they ship you one defective part, put them in "CSII" (which, of course, doesn't take care of much other than improving a Detection method, in some/most cases).

Bill
 

Paul Simpson

Trusted Information Resource
#10
He who pays the piper!

I can understand the viewpoint of Commander. Doesn't mean I agree though. I much more follow Bill's point of view. The systems are there, if they weren't then the company wouldn't have ISO TS or QS or even ISO 9001.2000. The point is should you have to pay $3000 to see evidence of it? I think not. There may be a cost in copying the documents but $3k?

It sounds like someone isn't too happy with the contract they signed up to!

On a more general point, if I have a supplier who is contributing significantly to my APQP activity I would want some confidence that they are doing the work, not to find out when it's too late that they aren't going to deliver. That is what APQP reporting is all about - project management!
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
V Supplier wants to perform pre-qualifications prior to every run instead of locking in parameters. Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 7
Genofear Customer wants to audit our supplier audits - seems inappropriate General Auditing Discussions 11
M Key Supplier Risk Mitigation - Supplier Changes or wants to change Sub-Tier Suppliers Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 5
V Customer wants to know what CC and SC's are on supplier prints. APQP and PPAP 2
T New Supplier from the Automotive Field wants a Buy-Off Procedure Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 7
W Carton Boxes - Possible High Pollution Threat - Supplier wants Information Miscellaneous Environmental Standards and EMS Related Discussions 23
M Supplier Audits - Sales department wants me to add a section on the environment Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 7
D Re-labeler - audit the supplier EU Medical Device Regulations 2
Evelyn7E The fastest way to get supplier to ship good parts to you Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 10
J Verification of purchased product / supplier questionnaires ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
D Question on Supplier Quality (SCAR) ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
Z REACH: contradictory statement from supplier? REACH and RoHS Conversations 4
G How to implement H&S and Quality Control Requirements in Contract for Potential Supplier? Contract Review Process 6
R Select the 1 Supplier based on the Parts Durability from 6 Supplier Samples using Minitab Using Minitab Software 11
K Why does load cell supplier requires force verification General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
D Question and advice for a supplier self audit questionnaire ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
D Special IATF audit of sub-supplier IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 18
S IATF 16949 Supplier selection criteria 8.4.1.2 IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 2
M Supplier approved list - Notified body, regulatory body Supply Chain Security Management Systems 4
N Making improvements in supplier relationship last? Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 6
K Supplier Qualification for Engineering Consultant? Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 3
M Supplier evaluation Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 5
briteme4 ASL - AS9100 / Supplier Survey Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 3
A System for Supplier Documents Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools and Solutions 7
T IMDS submission without supplier's input? RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 0
J Supplier not responding to PPAP request APQP and PPAP 5
D Supplier audit Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 2
lanley liao Does all of the suppliers need to integrated into the supplier list qualified of the company? Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 2
S Distinction between a critical supplier and a Virtual manufacturer EU Medical Device Regulations 2
R AS9102 FAI Change in Material / Process Supplier AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 4
John Broomfield Five ways to botch your supplier management program Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 7
C Supplier survey - 200 to 250 duppliers Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 3
J Where is the definition of a critical supplier? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
U Approved Vendor (supplier) List Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 8
M Supplier requirements - Major supplier is a Non-Profit registered with ICCBBA (FDA UDI) Supply Chain Security Management Systems 12
P Training department ideas and development for automotive supplier Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 6
B Software service provider as critical supplier ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
T AS9100D Clause 10.2.1g Supplier Corrective Action for each and every nonconformity? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
S Supplier protocol for the Quality Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 6
A API Spec Q1 Purchasing Process - Supplier Reevaluation based on Supplier Risks 5.6.1.4 Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 17
D Approved supplier list - Distributors question ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
G Supplier delivered recent PPAP, should he deliver yearly layout inspection? IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 4
E ISO 13485 QMS certification as a Supplier ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 8
G Supplier doesn't share drawings IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 15
S Use of raw materials by two supplier CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 2
D Are Supplier Quality Agreements Quality Records ? Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 9
G Dealing with non conformity caused by Supplier Components detected in the production line IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 14
G Supplier doesn't accept the complaints Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 20
K New supplier audit as per V3.1 by French Automotive OEM General Auditing Discussions 2
A ASL requirement when the supplier is certified for ISO 13485 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6

Similar threads

Top Bottom