TUS Sensors in AMS2750 Calibration Requirements



The AMS 2750E Pryometry is quite complex and convoluted when it comes to sensor requirements and calibration do's and don't's . I am using some type K expendable sensors for my TUS and despite all the references to not being able to recalibrate them I do not see a requirement that they would need to be recalibrated after initial calibration unless they are damaged or the user has taken action after "ensuring that excessive drift has not occurred under the particular conditions (environment, time, and temperature) of exposure." section
From section
Any base metal TUS thermocouple that is (1) used exclusively under 1200 F (650 ?C), (2) identified, and (3) preserved/protected from damage (i.e., crimping, excessive moisture contact, corrosion, etc.) between tests orremains installed on a rack that is protected between tests,) shall be limited to no more than 90 uses or 3 years, whichever comes first and may be reused subject only to the limitations of to

It appears that I can use and reuse my type K expendable sensors for TUS at 500F or less as long as they are not damaged ( and and according to Fig 1 in the reuse column that I need to follow the U-formula at and
So as I see it I can use my K expendable sensors for 30 uses ( is the 30 restriction for expendable sensors) or "3 years, whichever comes first.." .
So if I have one oven that requires a TUS quarterly (one "use") I can pretty much expect my TUS sensors to last 3 years without having to be replaced OR recalibrated... and since they cannot be recalibrated I would just replace them.. of course if they are damaged per before then they would have to be replaced before the time or use limit comes into effect.
Am I correct? This seems that I can actually justify that I do not have to or am not allowed to check/calibrate these sensors ever for 3 years!

I have attached the Fig 1 and the sensor cal table 1 with its accompanying notes...


Last edited by a moderator:
Elsmar Forum Sponsor


Staff member
Basically, the wires have very short lifespan; with increased temperatures and frequent uses degrading them even quicker.

So what exactly are you trying to determine? How often to replace wire?

And yes. :) It can all be quite confusing. :D


Well it makes sense that if I only use the probes for less than 30 uses at less than 500F that I should easily be able to get 3 years out of them before having to "recalibrate" or scrap them!
What I do not understand is what is the reference for recalibration at 3 months in the base nonexpendable row in Figure 1? I guess it covers the fact that if you use these at higher temperatures than you are expected to make sure that the heat does not damage and degrade their performance and you are pretty much penalized for wanting to use a nonexpendable sensor. Unless you do the calibration of the sensor inhouse the costs and time associated with sending out the sensors for a cal every 3 months would be cost prohibitive and it would make more sense to buy the expendable ones at the start. According to the document I would have to start the 3 month cal cycle on a base nonexpendable J sensor used at under 1200F right after the first 3 months of its use irregardless that section grants 90 uses or 3 years! Had it been a base expendable J sensor I would not have to worry about the 3 month cal and instead take the 30 use or 3 years only as the requirement!

Do you read section as stating that the sensor after 90 uses or 3 years is to be discarded , OR do you read section as stating that after 90 uses or 3 years the sensor may be reused if not damaged per section to Section seems to nullify this as even if you "salvage" the sensor you still need to include the number of uses prior to the salvage to the total number of uses (which tends to say a "salvage" does not even save the whole sensor wire from being scrapped!)... or does this only apply to expendable sensors as referenced in from ARRRGH. :frust:this seems really messed up.. I attached the sections in question in case anyone has the answer, to this convoluted doc... Thanks.
BTW I really have learned a lot from this forum in my short time here .... hope it can remain active...



Staff member
I know it can be confusing. Ok... if you don't mind, let's approach this from a different angle.

Let's identify your needs.
  • How many ovens/chambers do you map?
  • How many survey temperatures for each chamber?
  • How often is that performed a year?
Then, for each of these, break them into different components for the temperature break points (500?F; 1200?F; 1800?F) if that applies.
Are you purchasing calibrated rolls of wire? Special limits of error?
Are you purchasing teflon for below 500F? Or is it all a fiberglass based wire?
One more question (I think:D)... how does your wire physically appear over time? Does it appear to get pretty worn/ pretty quick? Is a door closing on them, wearing them out?
Sorry for all the questions, and you can ignore if you wish. I just think it would be much more helpful to determine what your needs are, then develop a use-approach based on the procedure.


I have only one oven currently with minimum 9 sensors for TUS. I will probably add an another oven to the TUS schedule for a backup.
I have a single temp of 302F and that is what I have my TUS dataloggers and sensors all calibrated for to keep it very simple and inexpensive, we only have one process temperature for the only 3 parts we dry film!
My TUS is obviously also for this one temp... to keep it simple and fast as I only have to ramp the oven up and down once!
I have purchased the TUS expendable k thermocouples in a 6 inch probe configuration because that really makes it easy to clip them on my oven rack and position them exactly toward my zone extremities. This makes clipping the ends off and reusing them impossible as compared to a straight wire one but reading into the 2750 spec i did not seem to need this as long as the probe/wire was not damaged plus getting 3 years for my purchase seemed like a good ROI. These sensors/wire are PFA coated and have special limits of error to meet the 1.1C of the spec. but they are considered expendable due to the PFA wire sheathing at least that is how I interpret their definition of "expendable".

With a class 5 oven with Intrument D, we are currently required to do a quarterly TUS but can drop it to semiannual after a year of consecutive TUS reports. This will enable me to add my second oven with the same set of probes, as it currently stands if we stay quarterly TUS with two ovens that would be 32 uses for 3 years which is a bit over the allowed 30 but if we went semi annual then I have extra uses available.


Staff member
Thanks for the writeup! So you have non-expendable TCs.

What about keeping a log of use?. At 30 uses, carry your data logger to a local, competent lab and have them calibrate the probes and the data logger as a loop?

To me that sounds like the least expensive and the easiest.


Why do you say I have nonexpendable TCs?

Screen Shot 09-29-14 at 12.09 PM.jpg

Screen Shot 09-29-14 at 12.10 PM.jpg

I believe my PFA coated TC wires fit the definition of expendable in the document..

There seems to be a minor conflict in the documents of Fig 1 and table 1. Table 1 seems to say that no matter whether the E or K sensors are expendable or non expendable the "types E&K not permitted" for recalibration. But Fig 1 seems to give more detail based on whether it is a TUS, resident SAT or non resident SAT and whether it is expendable or not. Figure 1 seems to allow recalibration of E&K NONEXPENDABLE as long as they are never used above 500F. So if I go with Figure 1 detailed rules and determine my sensors are nonexpendable then I could justify a recalibration on a 3 month schedule forever as long as we meet, and only refers to expendable sensors as pointed to in section
It is not cost effective to recalibrate a non expendable K every 3 months for 3 years with an external cal service as compared to using an expendable one for 3 years with only an initial calibration and then throwing it away and buying a new one! That is how I read Figure 1!


Staff member
OK. So I would recommend buying a 1000' roll of wire. That way, the cost of calibration is then spread across the roll.

Make t/c's , keep track of their use; and when they're done, toss them.
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
J CQI-9v4 Alternative TUS Testing Methods Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 0
J Furnace repaired - Do I need a new initial TUS? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
Q AMS 2750 E or F Continuous Furnace TUS Data Collection AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
B Determining SAT Offsets vs TUS Offsets per SAE AMS 2750E AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 0
J AMS 2750 E Clause3.5.17.13 TUS Pass/Fail Requirements AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
K Temperature Uniformity Survey (TUS) - Vacuum Furnace General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 1
H Performing a TUS on a Furnace used at One Temperature - AMS2750-E AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 27
N Load Thermocouple requirement for TUS (Temperature Uniformity Survey) AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 8
B Inhouse Calibration Plus TUS in accordance with AMS 2750 rev E? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 31
J Pyrometry Field Test Instrument to perform TUS (Temperature Uniformity Surveys) AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 11
S Nadcap - AC7102 - Heat Treament - TUS question AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 5
J Error Proofing sensors in PFMEA FMEA and Control Plans 2
A Using Arduino based sensors for Poke-Yoke Manufacturing and Related Processes 6
Marc DOD, DHS and NASA Are Driving Adoption of Internet of Things Sensors IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 1
J Looking for Testing facility to do testing of x ray sensors for us US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
H NADCAP Audit Nonconformances - Vacuum Furnace Load Sensors AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
M Temperature Uniformity Survey Sensors AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 7
R Classification of Applied Parts - Blood Measurement Sensors IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 12
Q Gage R&R for Vacuum Gage and Temperature Sensors Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
A Gage R&R without Operators (using Sensors) using Minitab Using Minitab Software 2
N IQ/OQ for Process Monitoring System - Sensors and HMI System 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 2
N Uncertainty calculations for RH (Relative Humidity) sensors Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 5
W Directives and regulations required for medical implants with RFID sensors ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 9
Marc Honda Motor Co. will recall thousands of its Odyssey minivans - Airbag Sensors World News 0
R AMS2750 rev F discussion AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 2
S Double Thermocouple - Two types, same sheath (AMS2750/Nadcap) Manufacturing and Related Processes 9
C Where can I get AMS2750 training? AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 3
K Who conducts Training in AMS2750 Pyrometry in INDIA Training - Internal, External, Online and Distance Learning 2
S AMS2750 rev D - para - "Signature of the calibration company representative" Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 3
G Why has Nadcap made AMS2750 a requirement for paint/dri-lubes cure ovens? Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 5

Similar threads

Top Bottom