UDI - Direct Labelling

JoCam

Trusted Information Resource
#1
Hi All,

If a re-usable medical device cannot be labelled directly due to the effect it will have on it's safety, is a manufacturer obliged to inform customers to record the UDI from the associated packaging to enable traceability?

Jo
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
#2
JoCam,
I think this is a question that should be directed at your local authorities. It may be that in UK they have a different set of expectations than either the US or the EU. My understanding is that the UK is currently thinking that they will be somewhat different than either FDA UDI or EU MDR. Generally speaking, the healthcare regulators recognize that DPM cam be difficult. They have extended deadlines for marking reuseables with DPM to allow for testing, equipment installations, programming, etc.
 

JoCam

Trusted Information Resource
#3
Hi Miken99,

I've posted this into the EU Medical Device Regulations forum as the UK are still a part of the EU and therefore governed by EU Regulations for medical devices, I have, up until now, heard nothing to the contrary. Can you tell me how you have the current thinking that the UK will be somewhat different than EU MDR? Also, what is DPM? I feel that this is probably something I should already know, so I'm hoping I have another initialism for it.

Jo
 
#4
Jo,

DPM is Direct Parts Marking, the term used for laser, dot peen type barcodes that are permanent on the product.

Regarding EU and UK regulatory, I recently saw a reference to the UK Minister of Health, Cost and Import Control and a request to add 20 additional fields to the UDI database specific to UK. EU requested an added 60 fields. I may have jumped to an incorrect assumption that UK was paving their own trail somewhat.
 

rob73

looking for answers
#5
Hi Jo
Looking at the new MDR annex VI (UDI), for reusable devices there are exceptions to direct marking of devices paragraph 4.10 reads
"Devices that are reusable shall bear a UDI carrier on the device itself. The UDI carrier for reusable devices that require cleaning, disinfection, sterilisation or refurbishing between patient uses shall be permanent and readable after each process performed to make the device ready for the subsequent use throughout the intended lifetime of the device. The requirement of this Section shall not apply to devices in the following circumstances:
(a) any type of direct marking would interfere with the safety or performance of the device;
(b) the device cannot be directly marked because it is not technologically feasible."

Therefore if you can show in your risk managemnt process that DPM would adversely affect safety, you can justify not DPM.
As Mikem suggested DPM can be in different forms, we use an inkjet printer, i have seem laser etching on stainless steel surgical instruments,
Here is an example (from a google search) Sic Marking | Datamatix marking, dot peen datamatix marking, laser datamatix marking


As for Brexit, i doubt very much that we (UK) will replace these regulation beforehand.
 

JoCam

Trusted Information Resource
#7
Thank you Rob 73,

I know that we don't have to do it, and I can certainly justify via risk assessment the reason why, but I'm wondering whether if the device is not uniquely identified a system should be in place to ensure that it can be traced. For example, the device is put into use in a hospital that is full of previously ordered devices that they have purchased from us before, and nobody records the serial number from the packaging and assigns it to it's location. A few weeks later we discover that there is a manufacturing fault associated with a certain batch of raw material in our product, and need to recall the affected devices. On contacting the hospital that has received one of the affected devices, how can they identify it amongst all the others? Is it just enough to accept the fact that all devices must be returned? Is the onus on the customer to have a system of traceability at their facility, or us as the manufacturer to inform them to do so?

Jo
 

rob73

looking for answers
#8
Jo
As long as you are complying with the regulations and giving the customer the means to trace the device i.e. LOT or batch number is on device, either as human readable information or in the form of a barcode, there is little more than you can do. Traceability to the point of use by the manufacturer would be an impossible task. The new MDR article 25 requires (my interpetation) traceability to the healthcare institution or healthcare professional, no further.
 

dgrainger

Trusted Information Resource
#9
The Health institution has to record UDI for class III implantables and Member states may require that records are kept for other classes of devices:

Article 27.9:
9. Health institutions shall store and keep preferably by electronic means the UDI of the devices which they have supplied or with which they have been supplied, if those devices belong to class III implantable devices.
For devices other than class III implantable devices, Member States shall encourage, and may require, health institutions to store and keep, preferably by electronic means, the UDI of the devices with which they have been supplied.
Member States shall encourage, and may require, healthcare professionals to store and keep preferably by electronic means, the UDI of the devices with which they have been supplied with.​
 
#10
Jo,
I agree with Rob's opinion. You can only do what you can do (and are responsible for).

Whether the hospitals actually take advantage of the easy traceability is up to them - and of course their accrediting agencies, their insurance companies and government regulators. All of these players have an interest in promoting best practices. Here in the US we have JACHO, CMS (Medicare) and the FDA in those roles. Eventually, untraceable devices will be in the rear view mirror.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
M Medical Device News FDA Guidance - UDI: Policy Regarding Compliance Dates for Class I and Unclassified Devices and Certain Devices Requiring Direct Marking Other US Medical Device Regulations 0
C Data Matrix and DPM (direct part marking) UDI Standards - ISO/IEC TR 29158 Other US Medical Device Regulations 2
K UDI Direct Marking Compliance Date Clarification and one other UDI question Other US Medical Device Regulations 0
M UDI - Direct Marking and Reprocessing Clarification Other US Medical Device Regulations 12
N FDA UDI - Label vs. Labeling - Does the insert need to include UDI? Other US Medical Device Regulations 0
K Is UDI (Unique Device Identifier) symbol mandatory under EU MDR? EU Medical Device Regulations 1
M UDI procedure/ report 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 0
R Shall a new UDI-DI be required when stand-alone software device's version is updated? EU Medical Device Regulations 1
D Hospital Decontamination and the MDR - Technical Files, UDI and PMS EU Medical Device Regulations 3
F UDI - Unit of Use and Class I, single-use devices EU Medical Device Regulations 4
F UDI Registration - Who is responsible for Registration of the Device? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 11
M UDI Database and EUDAMED - Will there be two separate databases? EU Medical Device Regulations 3
Q Must product name be listed the same name in FURLS, UDI, GUDID and Company Website? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
Q LOT or Serial Number Symbol not used when the information is contained in the UDI? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
J Looking for a template SOP for UDI implementation for EU Medical Devices EU Medical Device Regulations 0
M Basic UDI and technical documentation EU Medical Device Regulations 1
A UDI and Design Controls - Labeling change via the Design Control process 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
M MDR Requirements - UDI/Barcodes/QR codes on IFUs EU Medical Device Regulations 4
M UDI transition period and implementation EU Medical Device Regulations 6
M UDI size on packaging EU Medical Device Regulations 3
R UDI for US - Third Party device Repackager Other US Medical Device Regulations 9
M UDI placement - Packaging levels EU Medical Device Regulations 2
L UDI Requirments Gap Analysis - EU MDR vs FDA CFR EU Medical Device Regulations 8
M DI format for UDI after we have registered it with GS1 Other US Medical Device Regulations 0
P UDI labeling for power module IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 6
DitchDigger UDI, Labeling Accessories, General Insanity, Etc. US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
K China UDI Implementation for October 1st 2019 China Medical Device Regulations 4
A What is the difference between Basic UDI-DI and UDI-DI? EU Medical Device Regulations 5
M UDI-PI on a package that contains more devices EU Medical Device Regulations 3
M Informational EU – Unique Device Identification (UDI) System – FAQs Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
F EUDAMED UDI Medical Devices User's Guide Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 6
J Class 1 Medical Device - Using a UPC over the UDI? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 0
Z Do we still have to put UDI if we have DI and lot number seperately on our product ? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 4
M EU Basic UDI-DI Trigger Points - When is a new Basic UDI-DI required EU Medical Device Regulations 3
P UDI-PI and the MDR - Is the UDI-PI required for all devices/classifications? EU Medical Device Regulations 8
M Informational US FDA issued the first warning letter for UDI violations to help ensure compliance Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
K Hospital UDI requirements Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 7
J FDA Class 1 Medical Device UDI requirements Other US Medical Device Regulations 19
J UDI Requirements - Products that all fall under the same family 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 3
M Informational EU – MDCG 2018-1 v2 Guidance on basic UDI-DI and changes to UDI-DI Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
F MDR 2017/745 Basic UDI-DI, UDI-DI & UDI-PI EU Medical Device Regulations 0
M Informational EU – EUDAMED UDI Device Data Dictionary + data sets Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M EU MDR - UDI requirements and responsibility guidance EU Medical Device Regulations 1
A UDI requirements for pre-filled combination devices - Box containing a pre-filled device US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
G FDA UDI markings "label" vs. "labelling" (labeling)? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 4
N EU MDR Basic UDI-DI and Technical Documentation for Systems EU Medical Device Regulations 22
M Informational MDCG 2019-2 Guidance on application of UDI rules to device-part of products referred to in Article 1(8), 1(9) and 1(10) of Regulation 745/2017 Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
Z UDI assignment Criteria Software IVDR Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
S Looking for procedure on UDI (Unique Device Identification) 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
S UDI (Unique Device Identification) Requirements for Remanufactured devices 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1

Similar threads

Top Bottom