UDI - Direct Marking and Reprocessing Clarification

M

Mark Meer

Trusted Information Resource
FDA 21 CFR 801.45 (a) states:
"A device that must bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label must also bear a permanent marking providing the UDI on the device itself if the device is intended to be used more than once and intended to be reprocessed before each use."

Couple quick questions:

1. So "direct marking" is synonymous with "permanent marking", and by "permanent marking" this means some kind of etching or engraving? I presume an indelible label is inadequate?

2. What is the definition of "reprocessing"? Does it include basic cleaning or disinfecting (e.g. simple wipe-down with an alcohol swab)?
 
M

MIREGMGR

Mark Meer said:
I presume an indelible label is inadequate?
Click to expand...

I believe the expectation is: it's the device maker's responsibility to define how the device is to be reprocessed. Any means of directly marking the device is acceptable if it will remain readable across the worst-case-foreseeable number of reprocessing procedures through the device's declared lifecycle.

What is the definition of "reprocessing"? Does it include basic cleaning or disinfecting (e.g. simple wipe-down with an alcohol swab)?
Click to expand...

I'm sure this is formally defined, but I don't have a reference handy at the moment. My understanding though is that "reprocessing" includes only operations that are done to the device to prepare it for safe and effective re-use, over and above ordinary cleaning and disinfecting.

Surgical instruments typically go to central sterilization for reprocessing. Some kinds of invasive scopes might be reprocessed by the using department.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
M

Mark Meer

Trusted Information Resource
Thanks MIREGMGR.
I've been trying to track down a formal definition of reprocessing...

The FDA should really have a dedicated page devoted to definitions, which all other CFR and Guidance pages can link to. Presently, all the definitions are scattered and restated.

Also, they could certainly clarify what they mean by "permanent" because, if as you say, it's based only on device lifecycle and foreseeable reprocessing, this is definitely not my idea of "permanent".

...I blame the FDA for my confusion! :notme: :lol:
 
Sam Lazzara

Sam Lazzara

Trusted Information Resource
Hi Mark,

1. Etching or engraving may be overstepping depending on the intended use. I like what EN 60601-1:2013 says about this. Section 7.1.3 is call Durability of markings. It requires that markings can only be removed with a tool or by lots of force, and shall be clearly legible during the expected service life during normal use. It also says that adhesive labels must not come loose or curl. Finally a cloth hand rub test is specified that involves water, ethanol and isopropyl alcohol

2. See "Reprocess" definition below from AAMI TIR 30 (2011) - A compendium of processes, materials, test methods, and acceptance criteria for cleaning reusable medical devices

Reprocess: To make ready for reuse a device, instrument, or piece of equipment by any or a combination of the following processes: cleaning, decontamination/disinfection, repackaging, and sterilization.
 
Last edited:
M

Mark Meer

Trusted Information Resource
Thanks Sam.

I also agree that the 60601-1 marking durability description is far more comprehensive.

...But I'm more concerned with FDA interpretation of their UDI requirements.

Reprocess: To make ready for reuse a device, instrument, or piece of equipment by any or a combination of the following processes: cleaning, decontamination/disinfection, repackaging, and sterilization.
Click to expand...

Is this an FDA definition? If so:
- could you kindly provide a reference?
- this seems pretty all-encompassing as far as reusable medical devices are concerned. I'd think that just about all reusable medical devices have some kind of recommended cleaning instructions...

EDIT: Ah, I see that an FDA representative quote to this effect (reprocessing includes cleaning) in this thread.
 
Last edited:
O

Obama420

"A device that must bear a unique device identifier (UDI) on its label must also bear a permanent marking providing the UDI on the device itself if the device is intended to be used more than once and intended to be reprocessed before each use.":bonk::notme:



_____________________
watson
 
M

Mark Meer

Trusted Information Resource
Thanks for following up on that MIREGMGR!
I totally agree with your statement that the "quote from Jay Crowley would be problematic for many makers of (non-invasive, non-fluid-path-communicating) durable devices if broadly applicable", and DICE's reply seems reasonable.

I really don't see why the 21CFR doesn't simply state something to the effect of: "UDI device markings shall maintain integrity and legibility as required by 830.20, throughout the device's stated intended use and lifecycle." That would cover reprocessing, cleaning, multiple-users...etc.

Oh well...

:topic:
A bit off topic here, but is a reply from DICE carry any authority should some 510k reviewer have a different interpretation later on? (...especially if made by phone...).
 
M

MIREGMGR

Mark Meer said:
A bit off topic here, but is a reply from DICE carry any authority should some 510k reviewer have a different interpretation later on? (...especially if made by phone...).
Click to expand...

Not just made by phone, but then paraphrased to you by some guy that you don't know in an Internet forum. Hey, sounds pretty authoritative to me, right?

The direct answer to your question is, depending on their seniority and their relationship with their supervisor, that 510(k) reviewers can interpret anything as they see fit. So when there's a 510(k) reviewer involved, my approach is to try to clarify every rule-interpretation as early as possible.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
M Medical Device News FDA Guidance - UDI: Policy Regarding Compliance Dates for Class I and Unclassified Devices and Certain Devices Requiring Direct Marking Other US Medical Device Regulations 0
C Data Matrix and DPM (direct part marking) UDI Standards - ISO/IEC TR 29158 Other US Medical Device Regulations 3
K UDI Direct Marking Compliance Date Clarification and one other UDI question Other US Medical Device Regulations 0
JoCam UDI - Direct Labelling EU Medical Device Regulations 9
S UDI-DI for device components - configurable device EU Medical Device Regulations 5
R EMDN and Basic UDI-DI EU Medical Device Regulations 6
T EU : How many characters in UDI-DI EU Medical Device Regulations 3
E UDI carrier deadlines EU Medical Device Regulations 3
M UDI Suggestions for consumable devices US Medical Device Regulations 0
C UDI Enforcement Status in Egypt Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
D UDI-DI and UDI-PI labelling EU Medical Device Regulations 1
I Higher level of packaging UDI-PI EU Medical Device Regulations 8
R UDI dates EUDAMED EU Medical Device Regulations 0
I UDI in Europe and US EU Medical Device Regulations 3
G UDI in EU vs FDA EU Medical Device Regulations 1
G UDI or not? EU Medical Device Regulations 0
M UDI IVD - before submission? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
N UDI for OTS Components Other US Medical Device Regulations 1
J Assigning UDI's for own brand products EU Medical Device Regulations 11
M UDI IVD Medical Device Class III US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
E UDI on product/packaging levels EU Medical Device Regulations 12
O 14-digits UDI EU Medical Device Regulations 3
L Looking for SOP Template for UDI under MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 4
P MDR Article 27 - UDI - Keeping records of UDIs EU Medical Device Regulations 1
S BASIC UDI-DI for a class IIa device marketed in a Procedure kit EU Medical Device Regulations 1
C UDI assignment and labeling. EU Medical Device Regulations 4
C Labelling and UDI Requirements - Implications of serial numbers US Medical Device Regulations 1
D Basic udi-di to not appear on IFU? EU Medical Device Regulations 4
R Legacy Device UDI Requirements EU Medical Device Regulations 9
R UDI Requirement at home patient use EU Medical Device Regulations 2
P UDI on devices exclusively intended for retail point of sale EU Medical Device Regulations 3
J UDI and Labelling hierarchy and requirements for separate device components EU Medical Device Regulations 7
M UDI barcode quality EU Medical Device Regulations 3
C How to place software version for SaMD product in HIBC secondary data structure (UDI-PI)? Other US Medical Device Regulations 4
C Issues with UDI-DI and LAA/LUA registration in Eudamed EU Medical Device Regulations 2
Watchcat Mobile app - Different UDI for different smartphones? Other US Medical Device Regulations 7
Watchcat One UDI per country? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
Watchcat UDI Timeframes? Other US Medical Device Regulations 7
A UDI-PI for IVDs used in house EU Medical Device Regulations 5
G SRN, Basic UDI, Legal Manufacturer EU Medical Device Regulations 6
A Basic UDI and UDI-DI for hip implant systems EU Medical Device Regulations 1
T FDA UDI Question - Class II Medical Device Other US Medical Device Regulations 2
R UDI Number Identification EU Medical Device Regulations 5
I Eudamed UDI-Module EU Medical Device Regulations 9
L Configurable UDI mdr EU Medical Device Regulations 0
L UDI implementation in Saudi Arabi (KSA) Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 1
L UDI-DI - Device will be sold by itself in a box EU Medical Device Regulations 2
P Basic UDI-DI and Legacy Devices EU Medical Device Regulations 19
C UDI for consumable/replacement components under the MDR EU Medical Device Regulations 7
K UDI for two units with different S/N on the same package/case Other US Medical Device Regulations 10

Similar threads

Top Bottom