RegAffairSpec520
Registered
A company I'm working with is having lots of discussions on the UDI carrier requirement for devices, especially regarding language around direct marking.
The device controls an active implantable device (both Class III), but is a non-sterile, at-home use controller for the patient. As it's a single patient device and does not go through reprocessing, cleaning, or sterilization procedures, the direct marking requirement was not deemed necessary. However, the UDI carrier information is not on the label adhered to the device itself either and I'm arguing that it needs to be because of the intended use and the intention of the requirement.
As intended, the UDI carrier information just on the package label is not sufficient for the device traceability. A patient will lose that package immediately. However, with the language of the MDR, it is hard to cite a direct requirement that the device be marked with the UDI carrier on the device label. "Label" in the MDR has a broad definition including both the device label and all package level labels. "Direct Marking" has no definition in the MDR.
It's my understanding that the UDI carrier info is to be on the device (either marking via label, or direct marking via laser, etch, ink, etc.). My case does not specifically meet the requirements for direct marking. However, how do I present that it still needs to be on the device label and not just on the package level labeling?
Thank you
The device controls an active implantable device (both Class III), but is a non-sterile, at-home use controller for the patient. As it's a single patient device and does not go through reprocessing, cleaning, or sterilization procedures, the direct marking requirement was not deemed necessary. However, the UDI carrier information is not on the label adhered to the device itself either and I'm arguing that it needs to be because of the intended use and the intention of the requirement.
As intended, the UDI carrier information just on the package label is not sufficient for the device traceability. A patient will lose that package immediately. However, with the language of the MDR, it is hard to cite a direct requirement that the device be marked with the UDI carrier on the device label. "Label" in the MDR has a broad definition including both the device label and all package level labels. "Direct Marking" has no definition in the MDR.
It's my understanding that the UDI carrier info is to be on the device (either marking via label, or direct marking via laser, etch, ink, etc.). My case does not specifically meet the requirements for direct marking. However, how do I present that it still needs to be on the device label and not just on the package level labeling?
Thank you