SBS - The Best Value in QMS software

UK standards body taken to court over OOXML (Microsoft's Open office XML)

B

Boingo-boingo

#1
From http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/0,1000000121,39408917,00.htm

The British Standards Institution has been taken to court by a group of Unix users in an attempt to get the standards body to recant its approval of Microsoft's Office Open XML document format.
The UK Unix & Open Systems User Group (UKUUG) said on Thursday that the British Standards Institution's (BSI's) controversial decision to vote for approval of OOXML in a recent International Organization for Standardization (ISO) ballot followed a flawed decision-making process.
The UKUUG is also folding in many other complaints about Office Open XML (OOXML), such as unresolved patent issues and a lack of completion in the specification's documentation, and is calling for the High Court of Justice to force a judicial review of the BSI's decision. The UKUUG is hoping a judicial review would find the BSI decision to be flawed and reverse it.
OOXML is Microsoft's answer to the OpenDocument Format (ODF), an established ISO standard based entirely on open specifications. OOXML is also theoretically open, but central to the UKUUG's legal action is ISO's fast-tracking of the format into standardisation without properly addressing its many unresolved technical flaws — an issue exacerbated by OOXML's extraordinary length as a specification, at 6,000 pages.
Following a highly contentious vote among national standards bodies, ISO announced on 2 April that OOXML was to become an official standard. There is, however, a two-month window following that date, during which the process can be derailed if one of the national standards bodies makes a formal appeal.
Serious objections have been raised within the decision-making community about the approval vote — notably in Norway, by the head of that country's technical committee — but none yet have come officially from any country's national standards body.
The UKUUG has been in existence for 32 years and is, according to Mark Taylor, the head of the Open Source Consortium (OSC), a "venerable organisation of men with long grey beards". "It is a testament to the feeling of injustice here," he told ZDNet.co.uk on Thursday. "This is the first time they've done something like this."
Speaking to ZDNet.co.uk on Thursday, UKUUG head Alain Williams said his group's objection was that ISO and the BSI were "trying to put forward something that is not fit for purpose". "Microsoft is trying to game the standards process because they don't want a standard that can be implemented by other people," he said. "If they had wanted that, they could have gone with the ODF format [but], if they adopt something like that, they begin to lose their stranglehold on the desktop."
"Something that had that high a level of contention is not suitable for fast-tracking," Williams added, while referring to Ecma — the industry standards body that pushed for OOXML to be fast-tracked by ISO — as a "Microsoft poodle".
Williams claimed the official backing of OOXML would harm not only the UK IT industry, by virtue of perpetuating Microsoft's "monopoly", but the country as a whole by not using an open standard that is guaranteed to be usable into the distant future. "If you're talking about reading documents in one or two hundred years' time, you would have great problems in doing it [with documents based on OOXML]," he said.

The OSC's Taylor told ZDNet.co.uk that the UKUUG's action carried with it "prima facie evidence that the BSI's processes have not been complied with or done in a very strange way".


"A lot of us believe there are questions to be answered," said Taylor. "The remedy that is being sought is a mandatory order to withdraw the BSI's vote approving [OOXML]. The BSI hasn't followed its own processes. For example, the [claim] that it was unanimously decided to pass [OOXML] — it wasn't. People will be called as witnesses to show there are serious problems with the BSI's processes."
Taylor, however, did not express confidence in the ability of the action — if successful — to reverse the ISO vote without similar actions being launched in other countries. "I don't believe the BSI on its own would be sufficient to pull the vote back, but it would certainly make a dent in it," he said. "Should there be others, it would certainly change the percentages [in the ISO tally]."
The BSI had not commented on the UKUUG's legal action at the time of writing.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
B

Boingo-boingo

#2
Re: UK standards body taken to court over OOXML

http://www.iso.org/iso/pressrelease.htm?refid=Ref1136

Four national standards body members of ISO and IEC – Brazil, India, South Africa and Venezuela – have submitted appeals against the recent approval of ISO/IEC DIS 29500, Information technology – Office Open XML formats, as an ISO/IEC International Standard.
In accordance with the ISO/IEC rules governing the work of their joint technical committee ISO/IEC JTC 1, Information technology, the appeals are currently being considered by the ISO Secretary-General and the IEC General Secretary.who, within a period of 30 days (to the end of June), and following whatever consultations they judge appropriate, are required to submit the appeals, with their comments, to the ISO Technical Management Board and the IEC Standardization Management Board.
The two management boards will then decide whether the appeals should be further processed or not. If they decide in favour of proceeding, the chairmen of the two boards are required to establish a conciliation panel which will attempt to resolve the appeals. The process could take several months.
According to the ISO/IEC rules, a document which is the subject of an appeal cannot be published as an ISO/IEC International Standard while the appeal is going on. Therefore, the decision to publish or not ISO/IEC DIS 29500 as an ISO/IEC International Standard cannot be taken until the outcome of the appeals is known.


Related link


ISO/IEC JTC 1 Directives - (Appeals are dealt with in Chapter 11)
 

Randy

Super Moderator
#4
Re: UK standards body taken to court over OOXML

Believe it or not, I do not know everything about everything and this is something I have to go "DUH":confused:

In layman's terms, and so an old broken down Grunt can understand, what is this all about and what's the big deal?
 
C

CliffK

#5
BSI taken to court: caution - long post

Believe it or not, I do not know everything about everything and this is something I have to go "DUH":confused:

In layman's terms, and so an old broken down Grunt can understand, what is this all about and what's the big deal?
ISO JTC-1 approved DIS 29500 as an international standard for electronic documents for office applications. It should not have done so. The standard weighs in at approximately 6,000 pages, has never been implemented by anyone and arguably cannot be implemented. In addition, there is already an ISO standard for electronic documents for office applications, ISO-IEC 26300 Open Document Format (ODF). JTC-1 violated its own rules to approve the standard.

The standard went in a fast track through ECMA, an organization anointed to grease the skids for standards in the IT world. Problem is, there are two ground rules for ECMA fast track. First, the standard must be already implemented, which makes it a de facto standard. Second, there must be consensus among ECMA members that the standard is the right thing to do. Apparently neither of these conditions existed. The standard has not been implemented, as I already pointed out. Also, there was considerable controversy over DIS 29500. The controversy continues to this day.

The crux of the matter with BSI is that BSI changed its vote (either from abstain or disapprove, I don't recall which right now) to approve. There is a suspicion (which I share) that BSI did so after being improperly influenced by the author of the standard, Microsoft. In fairness I must say that no proof of my suspicion has surfaced as yet. There are documented reports of Microsoft and/or its business partners exercising improper influence over other national bodies, as well. Three countries have actually appealed the vote to adopt DIS 29500.

Ironically, Microsoft now says that it will support ODF before it supports its own standard.

I fear ISO has irretrievably damaged its credibility as an IT standards body.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
A NB (Notified Body) Audit of Standards ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
S Applicable standards for CE marking of Spinal Intervertebral Body Fixation Devices EU Medical Device Regulations 3
S Is green for Vacuum - AFNOR (French Standards Body) Standard? Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 2
P Notified Body Abuse of Voluntary Standards EU Medical Device Regulations 8
B Do we need our Notified Body to be SCC (Standards Council of Canada) accredited? Registrars and Notified Bodies 6
Q 12th National Standards Body certified ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 5
S MDR GSPR Standards EU Medical Device Regulations 1
S Class 1 and 2 changes in CM standards (aerospace industry) Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 0
S 316 Stainless Steel Standards Other Medical Device Related Standards 0
U Is there any website out there that summarizes all relevant standards? Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
M Packaging standards - ASTM vs ISTA Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
M Label Making & Printing Standards ISO / ASTM ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
M Why are EU harmonized particular standards so old & out-of-date? IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 11
R Weld Penetration Standards and Requirements Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
S Any ISO standards around Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning? Medical Information Technology, Medical Software and Health Informatics 4
M ERP / QMS related software standards for Validation IEC 62304 - Medical Device Software Life Cycle Processes 6
M MDR harmonized standards EU Medical Device Regulations 3
S Where do l get calibration standards to run a calibration lab? Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 2
C Appendix Z in Harmonised Standards? EU Medical Device Regulations 13
Ajit Basrur Corporate management standards ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 4
Revision36 Engineering Change Order Industry Standards Other Medical Device and Orthopedic Related Topics 4
R Applicable ISO standards - packaging and others Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 4
Q Standards for Shipping by Sea US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
N Database that lists labs accredited to ASTM / ANSI standards Various Other Specifications, Standards, and related Requirements 6
S API Spec.Q1 Standards Version in Purchasing Information Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 1
B Exclusions or justification for non-applicability of IEC standards Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 1
P Citing EN standards Other Medical Device Related Standards 6
Ed Panek Compliance with Standards? When a standard is updated/revised CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 3
N Harmonized Standards for MDR Certification EU Medical Device Regulations 7
A Some questions about voluntary consensus standards in traditional 510(k) submission US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 6
D Imaging/Image Quality Standards Other Medical Device Related Standards 1
R ECG Risk Analysis Standards ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 2
I Management review in conformity assessment standards - Certification Bodies Management Review Meetings and related Processes 6
Govind Informational ISO COVID-19 response: freely available ISO standards Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 1
C Does a CE mark infer meeting all applicable standards? CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 4
T Assessing Hazard-Related Use Scenarios where control measures exist through standards IEC 62366 - Medical Device Usability Engineering 32
Richard Regalado Informational ISO makes available relevant BCMS standards free for online access Business Continuity & Resiliency Planning (BCRP) 6
A Technical File - Updating Applied Standards EU Medical Device Regulations 4
R Applicability of new non-harmonized standards (MDD/MDR) EU Medical Device Regulations 14
dgrainger Informational EU published new Harmonised Standards List for the Directives (25/3/2020) Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
P Static Electricity/Pacemaker - Standards for static electricity generation CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 3
M Referencing Harmonised Standards in Declarations of Conformity EU Medical Device Regulations 10
Pmarszal External Standards and Regulations Management Process Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 10
S IVF medical devices standards and test methods Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 4
M What are the standards for malls management? ISO 14001:2015 Specific Discussions 1
A Complaint alert levels - Industry standards pertaining to alert levels for complaints Customer Complaints 5
R MDR standards - which standards to comply with ? EU Medical Device Regulations 3
D Why does Official Journal list superseded standards? EU Medical Device Regulations 6
M MDR "Common Specifications" (CS) - If not standards, then what? EU Medical Device Regulations 5
L In house calibration - Our CMM's are outside certified can I use them to certify our standards General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 4

Similar threads

Top Bottom