US group implants electronic tags in workers

A

Automate Me

US group implants electronic tags in workers
By Richard Waters in San Francisco
Published: February 12 2006 22:02 | Last updated: February 12 2006 22:02
Financial Times

An Ohio company has embedded silicon chips in two of its employees - the first known case in which US workers have been “tagged” electronically as a way of identifying them.

CityWatcher.com, a private video surveillance company, said it was testing the technology as a way of controlling access to a room where it holds security video footage for government agencies and the police.

Embedding slivers of silicon in workers is likely to add to the controversy over RFID technology, widely seen as one of the next big growth industries.

RFID chips – inexpensive radio transmitters that give off a unique identifying signal – have been implanted in pets or attached to goods so they can be tracked in transit.

“There are very serious privacy and civil liberty issues of having people permanently numbered,” said Liz McIntyre, who campaigns against the use of identification technology.

But Sean Darks, chief executive of CityWatcher, said the glass-encased chips were like identity cards. They are planted in the upper right arm of the recipient, and “read” by a device similar to a cardreader.

“There’s nothing pulsing or sending out a signal,” said Mr Darks, who has had a chip in his own arm. “It’s not a GPS chip. My wife can’t tell where I am.”

The technology’s defenders say it is acceptable as long as it is not compulsory. But critics say any implanted device could be used to track the “wearer” without their knowledge.

VeriChip – the US company that made the devices and claims to have the only chips that have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration – said the implants were designed primarily for medical purposes.

So far around 70 people in the US have had the implants, the company said.

:eek: Is anyone else creeped out by this? :eek:
 
J

JRKH

Not I...

If I were going to get creeped out about this I'd already be part of the:
"Tin foil helmet deflecting government relayed alian ransmissions" crowd.

The number of ways that we can be monitored already is astounding. The safest bet is to not have anything to hide and live a very boring life. They can't track you if they are always nodding off.

James
 

Jim Wynne

Leader
Admin
There are two different technologies. One is the implantation of a chip, such as that mentioned in the article, that must be scanned from close proximity. They are commonly used in pets (my dog has one) and are used to identify lost pets. Typically what happens is that a shelter or veterinarian with scanning capability will scan the pet (using a "gun" similar to that used in stores for reading UPC labels) and the identification obtained can be entered into a central database where the pet owner's information is held. Nothing can be ascertained from the chip itself, except an ID number.

The other technology, RFID, uses miniature RF transmitters and can be read from greater distances, although not very great. They're currently used in inventory control applications mostly. For example, in a warehouse where individual cartons have RFID tags, it's possible to scan a large number of cartons simultaneously, without having to handle each one. It's thought that in the future, when the technology has been sufficiently refined, it will be possible to tag individual items, such as in a grocery store, thus making it possible to scan an entire basket of groceries in one pass, rather than scanning each item separately as is presently done.
The chips mentioned in the article are the former variety, and not the latter.

In either case, there is potential for abuse, just as there is with almost any new technology. Some religious individuals have equated chip implantation with the "mark of the beast" in the Book of Revelation.
 

Marc

Fully vaccinated are you?
Leader
BTW - It's a Cincinnati security company. But... The extra security sought may be offset by a recent discovery of Jonathan Westhues, where the security researcher showed the VeriChip can be skimmed and cloned, duplicating an implant’s authentication. When contacted, those at CityWatcher were unaware of the chip's security issue, according to the spychips.com release.
 

Jim Wynne

Leader
Admin
Marc said:
BTW - It's a Cincinnati security company. But... The extra security sought may be offset by a recent discovery of Jonathan Westhues, where the security researcher showed the VeriChip can be skimmed and cloned, duplicating an implant’s authentication. When contacted, those at CityWatcher were unaware of the chip's security issue, according to the spychips.com release.

Somewhat similar to the past practice of pirating cellphone access with scanners that grab and decode signals. There will be the inevitable back-and-forth between new encryption techniques and pirates' abilities to crack them.
 

Wes Bucey

Prophet of Profit
Marc said:
BTW - It's a Cincinnati security company. But... The extra security sought may be offset by a recent discovery of Jonathan Westhues, where the security researcher showed the VeriChip can be skimmed and cloned, duplicating an implant’s authentication. When contacted, those at CityWatcher were unaware of the chip's security issue, according to the spychips.com release.
If I were to write the scenario for entry into such a "secure" environment, my protagonist [or villain] would merely cut the device right out of the worker and use it to gain entry - Why go for high tech to defeat high tech, when "crude & rude" will accomplish the task?
 

Jim Wynne

Leader
Admin
Wes Bucey said:
If I were to write the scenario for entry into such a "secure" environment, my protagonist [or villain] would merely cut the device right out of the worker and use it to gain entry - Why go for high tech to defeat high tech, when "crude & rude" will accomplish the task?

A long time ago, when I lived in Chicago and parked on the street at night, someone broke into my car and pried open the glove compartment, which had no lock. So I guess it's better to use a pry bar instead of just turning the knob?
 

Wes Bucey

Prophet of Profit
Jim Wynne said:
A long time ago, when I lived in Chicago and parked on the street at night, someone broke into my car and pried open the glove compartment, which had no lock. So I guess it's better to use a pry bar instead of just turning the knob?
The reason some crooks are caught is they find one method of operation and superstitiously follow it time after time (modus operendi), even when a simpler or different method would be more efficient on any particular project. The police pick up on those clues and use them to tie a suspect to multiple crimes and get convictions based on a preponderance of circumstantial evidence.

Ever notice that some businesses run the same way - doing the same thing, time after time, when a different or easier method would be more efficient?
 
A

Automate Me

Crude and Rude

(Originally Posted by Wes Bucey) If I were to write the scenario for entry into such a "secure" environment, my protagonist [or villain] would merely cut the device right out of the worker and use it to gain entry - Why go for high tech to defeat high tech, when "crude & rude" will accomplish the task?

This reminds me of the movie Bladerunner.
 
R

ralphsulser

Automate Me said:
This reminds me of the movie Bladerunner.

Same way with vision or finger print recognition systems. Someone may be missing more of their anatomy.:mg:
 
Top Bottom