The order of first 4 elements is debatable....
I suppose, but without identifying your interested parties and issues, how is the scope to be properly defined? I mean, we can always say "We manufacture XYZ" but 4.3 is asking us to now use the scope statement to identify which clauses do not apply to our QMS and why; to do that, what was listed in 4.1 and 4.2 gets considered.
A review of the standard finds 4.1 and 4.2 specifically referred to in 4.3 Scope, 6.1.1 Actions to address risks and opportunities, section A.4 describing Risk-based thinking. Following that, it seems it might be useful to consider what is listed in 4.1 and 4.2 in Management review (which cites 6.1, which is then linked to 4.2 and 4.2), as well as 4.4.1 Quality management system and its processes for the same reason.
In short, 4.1 and 4.2 help to provide the foundation of the QMS.