Using an "operator copy" of control plan?

S

SteelWoman

#1
One of my managers asked if, in looking at our Control Plans as part of our transition to TS, if we couldn't come up with an "easier" version for our operators to use - the normal Control plan is rather confusing for John Average Operator - plus we use an "intranet" where all our procedures/control plans/controlled docs are available on computer at each machine - if they pull up a control plan on one of these the "presentation" of that form is not the best. In looking at the back of the APQP AIAG manual I noticed a Master Copy of a control plan followed by an "Operator Copy" - basically a stripped down/simpler version of the master control plan. I've frankly never noticed this before and wondered if any of you have successfully used this in your facility?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
B

Bob_M

#2
SteelWoman said:
One of my managers asked if, in looking at our Control Plans as part of our transition to TS, if we couldn't come up with an "easier" version for our operators to use - the normal Control plan is rather confusing for John Average Operator - plus we use an "intranet" where all our procedures/control plans/controlled docs are available on computer at each machine - if they pull up a control plan on one of these the "presentation" of that form is not the best. In looking at the back of the APQP AIAG manual I noticed a Master Copy of a control plan followed by an "Operator Copy" - basically a stripped down/simpler version of the master control plan. I've frankly never noticed this before and wondered if any of you have successfully used this in your facility?
Instead of making 2 control plans per part (2 times the work to update and control), why don't you just try updating your control plans to include plain english John-Average notes and comments. If that's not good enough, mabye you need to better train John Average on HOW to read the control plans.

Side note/question: Can't you design you own Control Plan form and make it as easy to read/look at? Or do some OEMs require you use the OFFICIAL looking control plans?

Alternatively we have:
Control Plans
And detailed inspection forms/records which mirror the INSPECTION requirements from the Control Plans, but try to do so I plain english when possible.

NOTE: We are not QS or TS but we use Controls Plans anyways...
 
#3
SteelWoman said:
One of my managers asked if, in looking at our Control Plans as part of our transition to TS, if we couldn't come up with an "easier" version for our operators to use - the normal Control plan is rather confusing for John Average Operator - plus we use an "intranet" where all our procedures/control plans/controlled docs are available on computer at each machine - if they pull up a control plan on one of these the "presentation" of that form is not the best. In looking at the back of the APQP AIAG manual I noticed a Master Copy of a control plan followed by an "Operator Copy" - basically a stripped down/simpler version of the master control plan. I've frankly never noticed this before and wondered if any of you have successfully used this in your facility?
As long as they are controlled and traceable to the master control plan they would be acceptable.
 
S

SteelWoman

#4
Instead of making 2 control plans per part (2 times the work to update and control), why don't you just try updating your control plans to include plain english John-Average notes and comments. If that's not good enough, mabye you need to better train John Average on HOW to read the control plans.
The control plans we use are in plain english, it's just that the format isn't very "user friendly" That's the part we're struggling with - trying to make it SIMPLE/IDIOT/MISTAKE proof.


Side note/question: Can't you design you own Control Plan form and make it as easy to read/look at? Or do some OEMs require you use the OFFICIAL looking control plans?
We're transitioning from QS to TS and TS (page 33) addresses pretty clearly the basic "parts" a Control plan must have - it follows the AIAG format. So I think we're stuck with that "higher level" document like it or not - I'm just trying to come up with a way to communicate the BASICS of that document in a format that is more user friendly. The example "Operator Copy" in the APQP seems designed for just that purpose, but I would really like to hear from anyone who's successfully used that in their system.
 

howste

Thaumaturge
Super Moderator
#5
I used to use AQuA software from Omnex for this. The database would have the entire control plan, but you could customize the output format to suit your needs. When I was asked for specific CP formats from customers (or for specific fields by auditors) I could show them exactly what they wanted without creating multiple documents. I would create electronic copies of CPs for operators that better met their needs, and would post them on the intranet. Does that sound close to what you want to do?
 
S

SteelWoman

#6
YES! That sounds exactly like what I'm looking for! Thanks, I'll go google it and find the software. Thanks!!
 
T

tomvehoski

#7
I have never liked the idea of issuing the full control plan to the plant floor - too much extra information that an operator does not need, and I agree it can be a confusing format. One of the best formats I have seen was a client in Mexico (small motors). Every station had work instructions which were 90% pictures with arrows, examples, etc.. Very easy to follow - I was able to understand them and can't read Spanish.

Send what works out to the shop floor. I agree it should be linked to the master control plan, but don't confuse an operator with a 10 page control plan if one picture will work.
 
B

Bob_M

#8
tomvehoski said:
I have never liked the idea of issuing the full control plan to the plant floor - too much extra information that an operator does not need, and I agree it can be a confusing format. One of the best formats I have seen was a client in Mexico (small motors). Every station had work instructions which were 90% pictures with arrows, examples, etc.. Very easy to follow - I was able to understand them and can't read Spanish.

Send what works out to the shop floor. I agree it should be linked to the master control plan, but don't confuse an operator with a 10 page control plan if one picture will work.
Good point.
Our "control plans" are very basic and easy to read (we're not QS or TS).
I never really considered the possibility of a 10 page control plan.
Ouch.
 
T

Teknow

#9
SteelWoman said:
One of my managers asked if, in looking at our Control Plans as part of our transition to TS, if we couldn't come up with an "easier" version for our operators to use - the normal Control plan is rather confusing for John Average Operator -
Might be a stupid question, but what use would "John Average Operator" have for the Control Plan? :confused:
 
B

Bob_M

#10
I believe when created correctly and fully, they act as:
Setup Instructions,
Work Instructions, &
Inspection Instructions
So potentially you have 3 documents rolled into one...
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
M Can I continue using IEC60601-1 Ed2 PSU for MOOP (Means Of Operator Protection) IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 7
B MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) with One Operator using a CMM or Common Calipers Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 4
S Using a P Chart to monitor Operator Performance? Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 31
C Operator's are not using Instructions! ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 25
Y We found out we have been using a equipment without validation for past 4 years Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 6
D Using Laboratory Notebooks in R&D and Design and Development ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
S Work performed in Canada on US patients using US device Canada Medical Device Regulations 1
S Is using ANSI/ASQ Z1.4-2008 the correct sampling plan to determine Pass/Fail of Apparel measurements? AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 4
A What are the pros and cons of using an audit software for internal auditing? General Auditing Discussions 4
Tagin Evaluating nonconformances for escalation using Bayesian methods? Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 2
D Using non-conforming components even though the final assembly is conforming? Manufacturing and Related Processes 5
B Using Unreleased Documents & Process Maps for Internal Audit purposes ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
R Clause 7.7 Replicate, Recalibration and Intermediate checks using Artifact ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
Stoic Are any medical device companies using the 2011 FDA process validation guidance instead of GHTF/SG3/N99-10:2004? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
B Unit of Use DI (Device Identifier) - Products using the same device US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 0
A Using Arduino based sensors for Poke-Yoke Manufacturing and Related Processes 6
M Using your Manufacturer's ISO certification ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
Ed Panek Adverse Event Clinical Trial using a 510K approved Device Other US Medical Device Regulations 6
B Using non CE parts in a machine CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 1
G Gauge R&R on multiple dimensions using 3D measurement system Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 6
A Hospital IT expectations for connected medical device using WIFI Medical Information Technology, Medical Software and Health Informatics 0
Proud Liberal Cp / Cpk on position using multiple MMC bonuses Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 2
B Using external FDA and ISO 13485 audit as internal audit Internal Auditing 6
D Using "Particle Size Standard" templates as gauges - How to avoid giving a gauge # while using for process control? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
J Class 1 Medical Device - Using a UPC over the UDI? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 0
I Reducing CE marking cost using manufacturer test reports CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 5
CPhelan Using clinical trial safety data for evidence for CE marking EU Medical Device Regulations 7
M Accredited Calibration Sevice Provider using computerized system to issue calibration certificate Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 3
M Accredited Calibration Sevice Provider using computerized system to issue calibration certificate General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
M Raw stock material testing discrepancy using an XRF (x-ray fluorescence) analyzer Manufacturing and Related Processes 7
Z Using FMEA for Knowledge Management FMEA and Control Plans 6
Sidney Vianna NASA to Develop a Novel Approach for All-Electric Aircraft Using Cryogenic Liquid Hydrogen as Energy Storage World News 2
S How many of you are using Robotic process automation for calibration lab management? ISO 17025 related Discussions 0
J Including Repeats in DoE using Minitab Using Minitab Software 5
S Legal Manufacturer FDA Reporting Obligations for Using New Contract Sterilization Site Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
John Predmore What size pinhole can be reliably detected using visual inspection? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 7
D I'm new in IMDS special using the IMDS application Manufacturing and Related Processes 8
John Broomfield Workplace by Facebook - Any other organizations using this collaborative tool? Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 0
I Flatness - Rectangular part using the three jack method Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 10
JoshuaFroud How important is using the "correct" GMDN? Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 13
A Overkill? Using the 3L5W tool on non-conformities Nonconformance and Corrective Action 3
M GD&T tolerance or band? Using a symbol like parallelism // Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 8
B Informational Expanded Gage R&R Analysis using Minitab Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 18
S Evaluating the possibilities of using qmswrapper or greenlightguru Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 4
P Is it possible to make an educated decision using a very very small sample size? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3
V Using K-Factor(Tolerance Interval) Analysis for Design Verification Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 3
O Which is better - Quietly quit using a supplier or tell supplier? Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 11
A Capability Analysis for Packaging Seal Strength with spec. >0.1 Kgf using Minitab Using Minitab Software 6
J Layered Process Audits using Kamishibai Board Process Audits and Layered Process Audits 3
Q How can you justify using a more accurate Pin Gage class? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 16

Similar threads

Top Bottom