Using Arduino based sensors for Poke-Yoke

a.temel

Starting to get Involved
#1
Greetings All,

I work in an injection molding company as a QA eng. and i have some ideas for poke-yoke systems based on arduino.I know this device isnt designed to work in a manufacturing env. but its cheap and could solve huge quality issues.

For example,we install metal nut to a plastic part and sometimes operator skip this process by mistake and this could be easily solved with a metal detecting circuit.But i m afraid to suggest this to menagement because,
a) Its not my area of expertise,
b)I dont know if it would be reliable in the long run,

Kindly expecting your insights.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Tagin

Trusted Information Resource
#2
It would seem that there would need to be two sensors: one to detect when the assembly is present to be checked, and one for the actual metal detection. Then, there would need to be some notification or intervention as a result of a failure, such as a flashing light, buzzer, email alert, shutting off power to that station, etc.

As for reliability, the concern would be false positives, so you would want to try to make the design so that if it fails, it always fails as false negative.

Those devices are cheap enough that replacement cost probably isn't an issue. Most of the cost would be in the initial configuration design and any software programming. But that should be reasonable for a simple device like an Arduino.

Maybe you could propose in more general terms that "an automated QC check device" would be advantageous. Then, give as an example, "maybe something not too complex - like an Arduino."

Hopefully, management is not going to be negative just because you have an idea for improvement.
 

Bill Levinson

Industrial Statistician and Trainer
#3
Re: "sometimes operator skip this process by mistake "

Shigeo Shingo (Zero Quality Control: Source Inspection and the Poka-Yoke System) dealt with problems of this nature very frequently and yours is very similar to those for which he has numerous case studies. The case studies often used mechanical sensors like limit switches to detect the presence (or absence) of parts that were supposed to be there.

If the part is in a jig or fixture, where the metal nut will always be in the same place, the metal detector (or limit switch) could be placed to detect the nut. Alternatively, if the part leaves the work station on a conveyor or work slide, a gate could be installed that will not open unless the metal detector senses the presence of the metal nut. Shingo's examples often had a sensor that would actually prevent a nonconforming part from leaving (jidoka or autonomation).

(Does not constitute formal engineering advice)
 

optomist1

A Sea of Statistics
Trusted Information Resource
#4
don't know your firms budget constraints...but a sure fire method is (and its is $$$) an AOI or automatied optical inpsection....camera machine vision to confirm correct fastener is in place correctly oriented etc...this then requires among other things use of a Golden Rabbit and a Red Rabbit...know good and bad part or assembly.....once properly vetted/proven and implemented works well. If this route (easier to rationalize the captial expenditure as well) is taken the AOI system can be implemented across other process steps and other production lines.
 
Last edited:

a.temel

Starting to get Involved
#5
@Bill Levinson
We have a gate system already.Gate is only activated if the nut assembly machine sends the signal.Problem is, this systems costs between 3000-5000 euros.So we cant implement it for every part.My idea is like this.Arduino controls magnetic sensor and movement sensor.If both is activated when operator drops the part into the box,part is ok.If only movement sensor is activated but not the magnetic sensor,part is NG.And all this costs below 50 euros.But i dont know if its reliable because i didnt see anyone in our line of business use arduino based sensors before

@optomist1

We use AOI's only for critical parts for OEMS.And they are even more expensive.
 

Bill Levinson

Industrial Statistician and Trainer
#6
50 euros is about the price range for a typical Shigeo Shingo error proofing system. If the movement sensor detects the part but the metal detector doesn't detect the nut, I suppose it could stop the box from continuing (jidoka/autonomation) and use a visual or audible control to alert the operator.
 

optomist1

A Sea of Statistics
Trusted Information Resource
#7
@Bill Levinson
We have a gate system already.Gate is only activated if the nut assembly machine sends the signal.Problem is, this systems costs between 3000-5000 euros.So we cant implement it for every part.My idea is like this.Arduino controls magnetic sensor and movement sensor.If both is activated when operator drops the part into the box,part is ok.If only movement sensor is activated but not the magnetic sensor,part is NG.And all this costs below 50 euros.But i dont know if its reliable because i didnt see anyone in our line of business use arduino based sensors before

@optomist1

We use AOI's only for critical parts for OEMS.And they are even more expensive.
I kind of suspected that might be the case....but when justified and properly implemented they are worth the effort...Cheers optomist1
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
D Risk Analysis using Monte Carlo Simulation instead of Scoring and Heat Map Risk Management Principles and Generic Guidelines 2
W Using tailoring guidelines to tailor a QMS procedure ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
Y We found out we have been using a equipment without validation for past 4 years Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 6
D Using Laboratory Notebooks in R&D and Design and Development ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
C Importer shell game - Using a third party logistics provider (3PL) in the EU EU Medical Device Regulations 5
S Work performed in Canada on US patients using US device Canada Medical Device Regulations 1
S Is using ANSI/ASQ Z1.4-2008 the correct sampling plan to determine Pass/Fail of Apparel measurements? AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 4
A What are the pros and cons of using an audit software for internal auditing? General Auditing Discussions 7
Tagin Evaluating nonconformances for escalation using Bayesian methods? Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 2
D Using non-conforming components even though the final assembly is conforming? Manufacturing and Related Processes 5
B Using Unreleased Documents & Process Maps for Internal Audit purposes ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
R Clause 7.7 Replicate, Recalibration and Intermediate checks using Artifact ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
Stoic Are any medical device companies using the 2011 FDA process validation guidance instead of GHTF/SG3/N99-10:2004? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
B Unit of Use DI (Device Identifier) - Products using the same device US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 0
M Using your Manufacturer's ISO certification ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
Ed Panek Adverse Event Clinical Trial using a 510K approved Device Other US Medical Device Regulations 6
B Using non CE parts in a machine CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 1
G Gauge R&R on multiple dimensions using 3D measurement system Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 6
A Hospital IT expectations for connected medical device using WIFI Medical Information Technology, Medical Software and Health Informatics 0
Proud Liberal Cp / Cpk on position using multiple MMC bonuses Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 2
B Using external FDA and ISO 13485 audit as internal audit Internal Auditing 6
D Using "Particle Size Standard" templates as gauges - How to avoid giving a gauge # while using for process control? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
J Class 1 Medical Device - Using a UPC over the UDI? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 0
I Reducing CE marking cost using manufacturer test reports CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 5
CPhelan Using clinical trial safety data for evidence for CE marking EU Medical Device Regulations 7
M Accredited Calibration Sevice Provider using computerized system to issue calibration certificate Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 3
M Accredited Calibration Sevice Provider using computerized system to issue calibration certificate General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
M Raw stock material testing discrepancy using an XRF (x-ray fluorescence) analyzer Manufacturing and Related Processes 7
Z Using FMEA for Knowledge Management FMEA and Control Plans 6
Sidney Vianna NASA to Develop a Novel Approach for All-Electric Aircraft Using Cryogenic Liquid Hydrogen as Energy Storage World News 2
S How many of you are using Robotic process automation for calibration lab management? ISO 17025 related Discussions 0
J Including Repeats in DoE using Minitab Using Minitab Software 5
S Legal Manufacturer FDA Reporting Obligations for Using New Contract Sterilization Site Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
John Predmore What size pinhole can be reliably detected using visual inspection? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 7
D I'm new in IMDS special using the IMDS application Manufacturing and Related Processes 8
John Broomfield Workplace by Facebook - Any other organizations using this collaborative tool? Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 0
I Flatness - Rectangular part using the three jack method Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 10
JoshuaFroud How important is using the "correct" GMDN? Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 13
A Overkill? Using the 3L5W tool on non-conformities Nonconformance and Corrective Action 3
M GD&T tolerance or band? Using a symbol like parallelism // Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 8
B Informational Expanded Gage R&R Analysis using Minitab Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 18
S Evaluating the possibilities of using qmswrapper or greenlightguru Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 4
P Is it possible to make an educated decision using a very very small sample size? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3
V Using K-Factor(Tolerance Interval) Analysis for Design Verification Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 3
O Which is better - Quietly quit using a supplier or tell supplier? Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 11
A Capability Analysis for Packaging Seal Strength with spec. >0.1 Kgf using Minitab Using Minitab Software 6
J Layered Process Audits using Kamishibai Board Process Audits and Layered Process Audits 3
Q How can you justify using a more accurate Pin Gage class? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 16
S Basic Dimension W/O using FCF Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 4
G How to compute or estimate a micrometer or caliper flatness using optical flat General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2

Similar threads

Top Bottom