Using Bugzilla as a Quality Reporting Tool



I'd like to benefit once again from the vast experience of this group.

Quick background:
I work for a very small (less than 25 people) family-owned company that designs and builds our own products (precision time systems). When I started here about 4 years ago, there was a primitive system in place to collect data on production rejects with an Excel spreadsheet. It worked OK in its limited application. I expanded it to encompass the entirety of the newly expanded inspection processes. It has been tracking Incoming Materials Inspections, Work-In-Process Inspections, Final Assembly Inspections, and Shipping Inspections, and has given us a fairly good read on the trends in our errors. I have it set up to generate trend graphs, Paretos, and Top 5 graphs for each category. It is by no means perfect, but it's worked to this point.

We have a new consultant of late (also another family member) who is pushing the idea of using Bugzilla as a means of tracking errors. It is already in place and in use in the production environment. He is now proposing that we replace the existing Excel system with a Bugzilla application. I am skeptical - admittedly based on my thus far limited exposure to it - that this will be an effective tool for this purpose. I don't get the impression that this is the intent of its design.

Has anyone else here used Bugzilla as an all-encompassing Quality database system with any success? I found in a forum search that Pancho has recommended it as a CAPA tool on a couple of occasions in the past, but I have not seen any mention of any wider use.

Any experiences you would be willing to share would be most helpful.
Elsmar Forum Sponsor


Super Moderator
Bugzilla is rather malleable so, in theory, it's quite possible. As far as I know, the tool doesn't have anything more than rudimentary (CSV) reporting so most likely, the data would have to be post-processed to give you charts and graphs that are relatively easy with Excel. (I can envision Bugzilla as the data capture mechanism and using the Excel spreadsheets to process / present the data).

One thought might be to jot down your "system" requirements and then see how they map into Bugzilla use.


Super Moderator
Hi Paul,

Yes, we use Bugzilla quite a lot. We have used it for CAPA for eight years, and for plant NC handling for about six, and we use it for various other bugs too. I think that our NC handling use is similar to what you are looking for. It is not really an "all-encompassing Quality database system" since our wiki is a database too, and it is not Bugzilla. But it is good issue-handling software.

The reporting is adequate for our needs. Nothing fancy, but as a database, you can pretty much print out any list of NCs (or "rejects") filtered, sorted, and subtotaled in whichever way you want.

The issue records can have any information you want to dump in them: discussion threads, custom fields, photos, pdfs or links to any other NC or to the www. Automatic emails are another nice feature. They keep the workflow going.

And the best part: Bugzilla gives you urls for each issue, and even for any search or report. This is very useful. For example, when a set of NCs gets escalated to a CAR, you can have the generating NCs immediately linked to the CAR issue (which is in our other instance of Bugzilla). Similarly, with such links, you can have access to that information from any wiki document, such as quality alerts or work instructions. And vice-versa. The NC can link to the relevant wiki document, such as a work instruction to help explain the problem, the correction, or anything else.

So that's my experience with it. Hope it helps your decision. Good luck!

P.S. Three other items: The reporting is perfectly readable html. Multiple users is never a problem. And it is foss.

Mike S.

Happy to be Alive
Trusted Information Resource
Change is good....but only if it is change in the right direction!

I've seen BZ used to track problems outside the software realm, but not sure it is gonna do what you want it to do.

Show this "consultant" what you can do now, ask if his proposed BZ solution can do it better, and maybe give him some raw data to show you how it is better.

New and different does not necessarily mean better.

Our new and different 6-figure cost QA NC tracking system is universally hated by the users. I am sure it has cost us money outside the initial outlay. But it eliminated some paper copies is a computer program so it must be better, right? Not.


I know it has limitations. So does the current Excel-based system. My proposal on two occasions has been an Access database. It solves the desire for better searchability and higher granularity, and ... we already have it. Unfortunately, this has been met with indifference both times.

So, I'm basically wanting to know if anyone has even tried to use Bugzilla on such a scale, and whether they succeeded or failed. As I said above, my experience so far tells me its not the right tool for this job. I'm more than willing to admit I'm wrong, though, should someone show me it can be effective (which our SME's here have not yet been able to do).


Trusted Information Resource
Software people see software as a solution for any problem. A carpenter would suggest a nail.

You'll have the usual challenges - does it do what you need? Is it accessible to all users? Are all the potential users computer savvy and in the habit of using new tools consistently ? Are the outputs user friendly on the eyes and brain, or does it just look modern?


Fully vaccinated are you?
A big aspect, especially with things like Wikis, is someone who really understands and does the backend well. Elsmar - Years ago someone wanted a Wiki here. I added one. I wasn't Wiki language literate. Few people were, and still today, in Wikipedia, few people really understand it all.

The important part is the User Interface (UI). It has to be simple and easily understandable. You can't expect the "standard" user to understand Wiki Markup for entries.

That said, it is a good database (which is essentially what it is) with great editing logging history.

But again - It's the UI that is important.

However - Like I say - You need a GOOD backend person who understands the software. The one who designed it and/or maintains it. This aspect can be expensive - It's essentially "programmer" experience. For some companies, OK. For others, not so much.

I did some work in the 1990's with a company which had a really good QA person who was good at programming. He did one heck of a job setting up a QA database, created excellent, simple UI - Had everything inter-linked and was really a wonder. Company size was about 75 souls. About 2 years later he left and no one else had any idea how it all fit together and was maintained.



Trusted Information Resource
Yeah, I've witnessed the crash when the wizard leaves town. Everybody is running around shouting " Where is the pencil? Do we have any paper ? "


Super Moderator
One of the main goals of any quality system is for the organization to learn the spells and have them available at points of use.

That "wizard" obviously didn't do their first job: document your process.


Fully vaccinated are you?
I fully agree, but, as happened in the case cited, they had to hire someone with that knowledge base. No one else in the company could jump in his seat and take over the processes. They were documented. Small companies often just don't have anyone with the background and at the very least have to hire a contractor.
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
M Any alternative method instead of using GR&R Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 26
R Using RPN to Confirm Risk Reduced to an Acceptable Level Risk Management Principles and Generic Guidelines 12
P Comparing Two Test Variables Using Attribute Data Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 0
J Using real time shelf life study as accelerated ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 1
C Clinical Trial using Prototype devices (EU MDR & ISO 14155) EU Medical Device Regulations 4
J Using an online software to maintain your QMS Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools and Solutions 7
S Process Monitoring using SPC software Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools and Solutions 6
R Using Scrapped NC items for training Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 15
M What is the Risk of Using Obsolete Versions of C=0 & ANSI/ ASQ Z1.4 Sampling Plans? ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 8
F Using non-randomized clinical study for change in existing 510(k) device? US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 1
J Using MD on a flight EU Medical Device Regulations 9
K Using Google Drive/Docs ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 30
J What risk to cover when NOT using ISO 17025 accredited/certified labs for calibration ISO 17025 related Discussions 3
T Poisson regression using Minitab Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 3
T Using NICE for guidance during CER CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 0
T Using Review articles from Pubmed for CER CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 8
Tagin Using a meme generator to poke fun at quality Funny Stuff - Jokes and Humour 2
D Finding Optimum Design Parameters using Taguchi method? Using Minitab Software 2
V MSA - Using a R&R study for a Tape Measure Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 19
D Using electronic lab notebooks in the design control process ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
M Using a Non Certified vendor Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 8
H Using/Selling power banks with your product as a "mobile version" CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 3
cgaro62 Using internal audits as part of document reviews Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 21
R Select the 1 Supplier based on the Parts Durability from 6 Supplier Samples using Minitab Using Minitab Software 11
M MSA angle issue - Nylon parts using Aberlink 3D Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 0
D Question on using audit checklist ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 20
J Using of CE marking - Two CE markings on the product CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 5
R Using R package to implement Bayesian phase I/II dose-finding design for three outcomes ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
S Defibrillator Protection applicability When using Multiple applied parts IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 0
P Using Zinc Plated Steel in a Cleanroom Other Medical Device Related Standards 3
J Incoming Inspection Records using Excel File ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
J Using ring gauges General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
M Load Cell Calibration using a totalizer on a flow meter General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 0
P Can Neoprene be Cleaned Using Isopropyl Alcohol (IPA) Manufacturing and Related Processes 4
GreatNate Anyone using the Intellect QMS software? Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools and Solutions 1
chris1price Sterilization using beta radiation Other Medical Device Related Standards 2
M Using the phrase "herein referred to" Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 8
B Struggling with using the 5.6 version Ford Capacity Analysis Report APQP and PPAP 5
cnbrosa Study Type 1 on a CMM using a measuring support Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 4
rerusk1 MRB (Material Review Board) Process using MS Sharepoint or MS Teams Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
K 510k FDA review, will they accept Biocompatibility result generated using feasibility product lots? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 8
B AS9100D Calibration or Verification Method using outside cal lab AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
U Medical Device CE Marking - Using a disposable bearing CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 3
D Calibration tolerance question using Pipettes Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 3
D Risk Analysis using Monte Carlo Simulation instead of Scoring and Heat Map Risk Management Principles and Generic Guidelines 2
W Using tailoring guidelines to tailor a QMS procedure ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
Y We found out we have been using a equipment without validation for past 4 years Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 6
D Using Laboratory Notebooks in R&D and Design and Development ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
C Importer shell game - Using a third party logistics provider (3PL) in the EU EU Medical Device Regulations 5
S Work performed in Canada on US patients using US device Canada Medical Device Regulations 1

Similar threads

Top Bottom