Using Caliper A to verify Caliper B - Verification of Calibration

Q

QAMTY

#1
Hi everybody

while defining the calibration and verification under 7.6 Control of monitoring and measuring equipment.

I have the following equipment:

1 caliper 150 mm named A

1 steel rule "Moore & Wright ER424" with 0.5 mm resolution
1 caliper 150 mm named B
1 micrometer.

In order to comply to standard, I sent all the equipment to an external supplier for the calibration and I have the certificates.

I have a print shop business, in fact we dont need tight tolerances
I accept +/- 1 mm in my product, in the past I have not had quality problems due to bad measurements.

Normally I use for inspection of the product the steel rule
The micrometer is used to measure sheets of paper and caliper is used to measure some ancillary equipment.

At this time I comply with calibration, but not for verification, for that, I have an idea.
The caliper A is a spare caliper, in case of failure of caliper B, the A is kept in a secure place and only will be used in such case.
Verification are planned every 6 months.

Question

Could I use the caliper A to verify caliper B, say measuring one part and comparing results, if such results fall within +/-1 mm, my caliper B is ok?
The same task it can be done with the micrometer, compared against caliper B, I dont want to spend money in gage blocks.

For the steel rule, I will only do visual inspection, (legible marks, numbers, etc.).

Other option it is not to verify the equipment and wait every year for the calibration of them, since our place is clean, measuring equipment is not
too much used, personnel take care of them, additionally my tolerances are not too tight.

Please shed light on me, give me some input

Thanks
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
#2
Re: Using caliper A to verify caliper B, under ISO 9001 2008

I do something similar, I have a numbered level assigned to calipers used in different areas. Quality lab calipers are "-01" engineering is "-02" and shop is "-03". A 03 shop caliper can be calibrated agianst an 02 or 01, but not another 03. I use this all the way up the chain. QA calipers are calibrated against the gage blocks directly.
 
N

ncwalker

#3
Given the tolerances are loose, you could also just select a gage master.

You don't have to verify a caliper against an EXACT gage block.

You could, now that your equipment has been verified, measure some random block of steel laying around (with the obvious requirements of parallel side to side with no burrs).

Let's say your newly calibrated equipment agrees that this gage block is 12.85 mm thick. Now, you have a "master." It would be better if you had two, with significantly different values.

Label them, store them in a controlled location.

Any time between now and your next calibration, you can check your masters and know that your gages are still calibrated.

Calibration is all about measuring a known object with a study device and demonstrating the study device gives you the expected response. It does not have to be any certain size.
 

Ron Rompen

Trusted Information Resource
#4
Given the tolerances are loose, you could also just select a gage master.

You don't have to verify a caliper against an EXACT gage block.

You could, now that your equipment has been verified, measure some random block of steel laying around (with the obvious requirements of parallel side to side with no burrs).

Let's say your newly calibrated equipment agrees that this gage block is 12.85 mm thick. Now, you have a "master." It would be better if you had two, with significantly different values.

Label them, store them in a controlled location.

Any time between now and your next calibration, you can check your masters and know that your gages are still calibrated.

Calibration is all about measuring a known object with a study device and demonstrating the study device gives you the expected response. It does not have to be any certain size.
Although the process described above is functionally correct, it fails in one area - there is no traceability to a NIST (or equivalent) standard. Not sure if this is important to you or not - in your line of work I would not expect that it is.
Another option is to purchase several individual gauge blocks - the prices are not as steep as you might think. As long as you have the calibration certificates for THOSE (and calibrate them at a frequency that YOU feel is appropriate) then you are covered.
 
R

randomname

#5
Using your own blocks for Verification between annual Calibration intervals would likely be fine for your application.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
G How to compute or estimate a micrometer or caliper flatness using optical flat General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
B Uncertainty in Length Measurement using a Caliper Measurement Uncertainty (MU) 3
D Calibration of Pin Gages using a Calibrated Caliper that measures to 4 decimal places General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 15
Tagin Using a meme generator to poke fun at quality Funny Stuff - Jokes and Humour 2
D Finding Optimum Design Parameters using Taguchi method? Using Minitab Software 1
V MSA - Using a R&R study for a Tape Measure Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 19
D Using electronic lab notebooks in the design control process ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
M Using a Non Certified vendor Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 5
H Using/Selling power banks with your product as a "mobile version" CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 3
cgaro62 Using internal audits as part of document reviews Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 21
R Select the 1 Supplier based on the Parts Durability from 6 Supplier Samples using Minitab Using Minitab Software 11
M MSA angle issue - Nylon parts using Aberlink 3D Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 0
D Question on using audit checklist ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 20
J Using of CE marking - Two CE markings on the product CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 5
R Using R package to implement Bayesian phase I/II dose-finding design for three outcomes ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
S Defibrillator Protection applicability When using Multiple applied parts IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 0
P Using Zinc Plated Steel in a Cleanroom Other Medical Device Related Standards 3
J Incoming Inspection Records using Excel File ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
J Using ring gauges General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
M Load Cell Calibration using a totalizer on a flow meter General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 0
P Can Neoprene be Cleaned Using Isopropyl Alcohol (IPA) Manufacturing and Related Processes 4
GreatNate Anyone using the Intellect QMS software? Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools and Solutions 1
chris1price Sterilization using beta radiation Other Medical Device Related Standards 2
M Using the phrase "herein referred to" Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 8
B Struggling with using the 5.6 version Ford Capacity Analysis Report APQP and PPAP 5
cnbrosa Study Type 1 on a CMM using a measuring support Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 4
rerusk1 MRB (Material Review Board) Process using MS Sharepoint or MS Teams Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
K 510k FDA review, will they accept Biocompatibility result generated using feasibility product lots? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 8
B AS9100D 7.1.5.2 Calibration or Verification Method using outside cal lab AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
U Medical Device CE Marking - Using a disposable bearing CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 3
D Calibration tolerance question using Pipettes Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 3
D Risk Analysis using Monte Carlo Simulation instead of Scoring and Heat Map Risk Management Principles and Generic Guidelines 2
W Using tailoring guidelines to tailor a QMS procedure ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
Y We found out we have been using a equipment without validation for past 4 years Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 6
D Using Laboratory Notebooks in R&D and Design and Development ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
C Importer shell game - Using a third party logistics provider (3PL) in the EU EU Medical Device Regulations 5
S Work performed in Canada on US patients using US device Canada Medical Device Regulations 1
S Is using ANSI/ASQ Z1.4-2008 the correct sampling plan to determine Pass/Fail of Apparel measurements? AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 4
A What are the pros and cons of using an audit software for internal auditing? General Auditing Discussions 7
Tagin Evaluating nonconformances for escalation using Bayesian methods? Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 2
D Using non-conforming components even though the final assembly is conforming? Manufacturing and Related Processes 5
B Using Unreleased Documents & Process Maps for Internal Audit purposes ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
R Clause 7.7 Replicate, Recalibration and Intermediate checks using Artifact ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
Stoic Are any medical device companies using the 2011 FDA process validation guidance instead of GHTF/SG3/N99-10:2004? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
B Unit of Use DI (Device Identifier) - Products using the same device US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 0
A Using Arduino based sensors for Poke-Yoke Manufacturing and Related Processes 6
M Using your Manufacturer's ISO certification ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
Ed Panek Adverse Event Clinical Trial using a 510K approved Device Other US Medical Device Regulations 6
B Using non CE parts in a machine CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 1
G Gauge R&R on multiple dimensions using 3D measurement system Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 6

Similar threads

Top Bottom