Using IEC 60601-1 2nd Edition for "Evaluations"

S

Shamann2

#1
I have a client that has a version of a medical device tested to meet 60601-1 2nd edition. That's right - 2nd edition. They want to ship out that product for "Evaluations" in clinical settings, some evaluations with IRBs, some perhaps not. Also some for "demos" by sales reps. The head of engineering and I are both uncomfortable with this approach.

They also said that they received a 510(k) right at the deadline for the 2nd edition and were granted a waiver to sell the products for 5 or 10 years. Has anyone heard of this?

This is not my area of expertise so comments and guidance are greatly appreciated.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Staff member
Moderator
#2
I have a client that has a version of a medical device tested to meet 60601-1 2nd edition. That's right - 2nd edition. They want to ship out that product for "Evaluations" in clinical settings, some evaluations with IRBs, some perhaps not. Also some for "demos" by sales reps. The head of engineering and I are both uncomfortable with this approach.

They also said that they received a 510(k) right at the deadline for the 2nd edition and were granted a waiver to sell the products for 5 or 10 years. Has anyone heard of this?

This is not my area of expertise so comments and guidance are greatly appreciated.
Hi,

First off, 510(k) - The transition deadline was some years back (2013 if I'm not mistaken). It's possible that they got cleared earlier, but not likely if their 510(k) is recent. It should be easy to verify. "Waiver" - none is needed. There is no FDA requirement to "move with the times". Once a 510(k) is cleared there's no need to upgrade to newer versions - the clearance is indefinite, unless the design changes significantly.

back to your general situation - there's a regulatory aspect and a general engineering / risk management aspect.

The regulatory aspect is simple - you need to look at where the device is going to be used and see what the applicable requirements are. I wouldn't take it for granted that 3rd edition compliance is required everywhere, for every purpose.

From the general aspect - 2nd edition is not that "bad". I believe that it still holds significant value. It is up to careful analysis and judgement. I would look to understand what exactly is planned under "evaluations in clinical settings", "evaluations by IRBs" and "demos by sales reps". The biggest question is: Will it be used on humans? As for basic safety for operators/demonstrators, I would tend to think that full certified compliance with the 2nd edition provides a reasonable safety assurance, but I know nothing about the device.

Cheers,
Ronen.
 
Last edited:
S

Shamann2

#3
Ronan, thank you so much for your reply. I do understand about the 510(k) being "permanent", but isn't there some requirement, perhaps by hospitals or local jurisdictions, to have products meet current safety and emissions standards? Besides the US, does the device need to meet current standards for Europe and Canada? I'm trying to get answers for the engineering staff who are of a different mindset than some other folks in the company.
 

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Staff member
Moderator
#4
but isn't there some requirement, perhaps by hospitals or local jurisdictions, to have products meet current safety and emissions standards?
That's a very broad question. Each hospital and local government may have different policies, requirements and expectations, so you'd have to reasearch them individually.

Electrical safety also exceeds the medical devices regulatory framework - any electrical equipment needs to be safe and there are various certification schemes around. This is not my speciality, I was addressing the medical devices regulatory aspect specifically. If you search Elsmar you'll find more than a few discussions mentioning electrical equipment safety qualification.

Besides the US, does the device need to meet current standards for Europe and Canada?
Yes, in the EU there's an explicit requirement to catch up with the "state of the art" which is interpreted as keeping up with the latest harmonized revision of a standard.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
Tagin Using a meme generator to poke fun at quality Funny Stuff - Jokes and Humour 2
D Finding Optimum Design Parameters using Taguchi method? Using Minitab Software 1
V MSA - Using a R&R study for a Tape Measure Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 19
D Using electronic lab notebooks in the design control process ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
M Using a Non Certified vendor Supplier Quality Assurance and other Supplier Issues 5
H Using/Selling power banks with your product as a "mobile version" CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 3
cgaro62 Using internal audits as part of document reviews Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 21
R Select the 1 Supplier based on the Parts Durability from 6 Supplier Samples using Minitab Using Minitab Software 11
M MSA angle issue - Nylon parts using Aberlink 3D Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 0
D Question on using audit checklist ISO 13485:2016 ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 20
J Using of CE marking - Two CE markings on the product CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 5
R Using R package to implement Bayesian phase I/II dose-finding design for three outcomes ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
S Defibrillator Protection applicability When using Multiple applied parts IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 0
P Using Zinc Plated Steel in a Cleanroom Other Medical Device Related Standards 3
J Incoming Inspection Records using Excel File ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 2
J Using ring gauges General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
M Load Cell Calibration using a totalizer on a flow meter General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 0
P Can Neoprene be Cleaned Using Isopropyl Alcohol (IPA) Manufacturing and Related Processes 4
GreatNate Anyone using the Intellect QMS software? Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools and Solutions 1
chris1price Sterilization using beta radiation Other Medical Device Related Standards 2
M Using the phrase "herein referred to" Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 8
B Struggling with using the 5.6 version Ford Capacity Analysis Report APQP and PPAP 5
cnbrosa Study Type 1 on a CMM using a measuring support Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 4
rerusk1 MRB (Material Review Board) Process using MS Sharepoint or MS Teams Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
K 510k FDA review, will they accept Biocompatibility result generated using feasibility product lots? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 8
B AS9100D 7.1.5.2 Calibration or Verification Method using outside cal lab AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
U Medical Device CE Marking - Using a disposable bearing CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 3
D Calibration tolerance question using Pipettes Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 3
D Risk Analysis using Monte Carlo Simulation instead of Scoring and Heat Map Risk Management Principles and Generic Guidelines 2
W Using tailoring guidelines to tailor a QMS procedure ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
Y We found out we have been using a equipment without validation for past 4 years Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 6
D Using Laboratory Notebooks in R&D and Design and Development ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
C Importer shell game - Using a third party logistics provider (3PL) in the EU EU Medical Device Regulations 5
S Work performed in Canada on US patients using US device Canada Medical Device Regulations 1
S Is using ANSI/ASQ Z1.4-2008 the correct sampling plan to determine Pass/Fail of Apparel measurements? AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 4
A What are the pros and cons of using an audit software for internal auditing? General Auditing Discussions 7
Tagin Evaluating nonconformances for escalation using Bayesian methods? Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 2
D Using non-conforming components even though the final assembly is conforming? Manufacturing and Related Processes 5
B Using Unreleased Documents & Process Maps for Internal Audit purposes ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
R Clause 7.7 Replicate, Recalibration and Intermediate checks using Artifact ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
Stoic Are any medical device companies using the 2011 FDA process validation guidance instead of GHTF/SG3/N99-10:2004? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
B Unit of Use DI (Device Identifier) - Products using the same device US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 0
A Using Arduino based sensors for Poke-Yoke Manufacturing and Related Processes 6
M Using your Manufacturer's ISO certification ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
Ed Panek Adverse Event Clinical Trial using a 510K approved Device Other US Medical Device Regulations 6
B Using non CE parts in a machine CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 1
G Gauge R&R on multiple dimensions using 3D measurement system Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 6
A Hospital IT expectations for connected medical device using WIFI Medical Information Technology, Medical Software and Health Informatics 0
Proud Liberal Cp / Cpk on position using multiple MMC bonuses Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 2
B Using external FDA and ISO 13485 audit as internal audit Internal Auditing 6

Similar threads

Top Bottom