SBS - The best value in QMS software

Using IEC 60601-1 2nd Edition for "Evaluations"

S

Shamann2

#1
I have a client that has a version of a medical device tested to meet 60601-1 2nd edition. That's right - 2nd edition. They want to ship out that product for "Evaluations" in clinical settings, some evaluations with IRBs, some perhaps not. Also some for "demos" by sales reps. The head of engineering and I are both uncomfortable with this approach.

They also said that they received a 510(k) right at the deadline for the 2nd edition and were granted a waiver to sell the products for 5 or 10 years. Has anyone heard of this?

This is not my area of expertise so comments and guidance are greatly appreciated.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Staff member
Moderator
#2
I have a client that has a version of a medical device tested to meet 60601-1 2nd edition. That's right - 2nd edition. They want to ship out that product for "Evaluations" in clinical settings, some evaluations with IRBs, some perhaps not. Also some for "demos" by sales reps. The head of engineering and I are both uncomfortable with this approach.

They also said that they received a 510(k) right at the deadline for the 2nd edition and were granted a waiver to sell the products for 5 or 10 years. Has anyone heard of this?

This is not my area of expertise so comments and guidance are greatly appreciated.
Hi,

First off, 510(k) - The transition deadline was some years back (2013 if I'm not mistaken). It's possible that they got cleared earlier, but not likely if their 510(k) is recent. It should be easy to verify. "Waiver" - none is needed. There is no FDA requirement to "move with the times". Once a 510(k) is cleared there's no need to upgrade to newer versions - the clearance is indefinite, unless the design changes significantly.

back to your general situation - there's a regulatory aspect and a general engineering / risk management aspect.

The regulatory aspect is simple - you need to look at where the device is going to be used and see what the applicable requirements are. I wouldn't take it for granted that 3rd edition compliance is required everywhere, for every purpose.

From the general aspect - 2nd edition is not that "bad". I believe that it still holds significant value. It is up to careful analysis and judgement. I would look to understand what exactly is planned under "evaluations in clinical settings", "evaluations by IRBs" and "demos by sales reps". The biggest question is: Will it be used on humans? As for basic safety for operators/demonstrators, I would tend to think that full certified compliance with the 2nd edition provides a reasonable safety assurance, but I know nothing about the device.

Cheers,
Ronen.
 
Last edited:
S

Shamann2

#3
Ronan, thank you so much for your reply. I do understand about the 510(k) being "permanent", but isn't there some requirement, perhaps by hospitals or local jurisdictions, to have products meet current safety and emissions standards? Besides the US, does the device need to meet current standards for Europe and Canada? I'm trying to get answers for the engineering staff who are of a different mindset than some other folks in the company.
 

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Staff member
Moderator
#4
but isn't there some requirement, perhaps by hospitals or local jurisdictions, to have products meet current safety and emissions standards?
That's a very broad question. Each hospital and local government may have different policies, requirements and expectations, so you'd have to reasearch them individually.

Electrical safety also exceeds the medical devices regulatory framework - any electrical equipment needs to be safe and there are various certification schemes around. This is not my speciality, I was addressing the medical devices regulatory aspect specifically. If you search Elsmar you'll find more than a few discussions mentioning electrical equipment safety qualification.

Besides the US, does the device need to meet current standards for Europe and Canada?
Yes, in the EU there's an explicit requirement to catch up with the "state of the art" which is interpreted as keeping up with the latest harmonized revision of a standard.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
R MRB (Material Review Board) Process using MS Sharepoint or MS Teams Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
K 510k FDA review, will they accept Biocompatibility result generated using feasibility product lots? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 5
B AS9100D 7.1.5.2 Calibration or Verification Method using outside cal lab AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
U Medical Device CE Marking - Using a disposable bearing CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 3
D Calibration tolerance question using Pipettes Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
D Risk Analysis using Monte Carlo Simulation instead of Scoring and Heat Map Risk Management Principles and Generic Guidelines 2
W Using tailoring guidelines to tailor a QMS procedure ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
Y We found out we have been using a equipment without validation for past 4 years Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 6
D Using Laboratory Notebooks in R&D and Design and Development ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
C Importer shell game - Using a third party logistics provider (3PL) in the EU EU Medical Device Regulations 5
S Work performed in Canada on US patients using US device Canada Medical Device Regulations 1
S Is using ANSI/ASQ Z1.4-2008 the correct sampling plan to determine Pass/Fail of Apparel measurements? AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 4
A What are the pros and cons of using an audit software for internal auditing? General Auditing Discussions 7
Tagin Evaluating nonconformances for escalation using Bayesian methods? Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 2
D Using non-conforming components even though the final assembly is conforming? Manufacturing and Related Processes 5
B Using Unreleased Documents & Process Maps for Internal Audit purposes ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
R Clause 7.7 Replicate, Recalibration and Intermediate checks using Artifact ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
Stoic Are any medical device companies using the 2011 FDA process validation guidance instead of GHTF/SG3/N99-10:2004? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
B Unit of Use DI (Device Identifier) - Products using the same device US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 0
A Using Arduino based sensors for Poke-Yoke Manufacturing and Related Processes 6
M Using your Manufacturer's ISO certification ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
Ed Panek Adverse Event Clinical Trial using a 510K approved Device Other US Medical Device Regulations 6
B Using non CE parts in a machine CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 1
G Gauge R&R on multiple dimensions using 3D measurement system Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 6
A Hospital IT expectations for connected medical device using WIFI Medical Information Technology, Medical Software and Health Informatics 0
Proud Liberal Cp / Cpk on position using multiple MMC bonuses Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 2
B Using external FDA and ISO 13485 audit as internal audit Internal Auditing 6
D Using "Particle Size Standard" templates as gauges - How to avoid giving a gauge # while using for process control? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
J Class 1 Medical Device - Using a UPC over the UDI? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 0
I Reducing CE marking cost using manufacturer test reports CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 5
CPhelan Using clinical trial safety data for evidence for CE marking EU Medical Device Regulations 7
M Accredited Calibration Sevice Provider using computerized system to issue calibration certificate Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 3
M Accredited Calibration Sevice Provider using computerized system to issue calibration certificate General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
M Raw stock material testing discrepancy using an XRF (x-ray fluorescence) analyzer Manufacturing and Related Processes 7
Z Using FMEA for Knowledge Management FMEA and Control Plans 6
Sidney Vianna NASA to Develop a Novel Approach for All-Electric Aircraft Using Cryogenic Liquid Hydrogen as Energy Storage World News 2
S How many of you are using Robotic process automation for calibration lab management? ISO 17025 related Discussions 0
J Including Repeats in DoE using Minitab Using Minitab Software 5
S Legal Manufacturer FDA Reporting Obligations for Using New Contract Sterilization Site Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
John Predmore What size pinhole can be reliably detected using visual inspection? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 7
D I'm new in IMDS special using the IMDS application Manufacturing and Related Processes 8
John Broomfield Workplace by Facebook - Any other organizations using this collaborative tool? Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 0
I Flatness - Rectangular part using the three jack method Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 10
JoshuaFroud How important is using the "correct" GMDN? Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 13
A Overkill? Using the 3L5W tool on non-conformities Nonconformance and Corrective Action 3
M GD&T tolerance or band? Using a symbol like parallelism // Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 8
B Informational Expanded Gage R&R Analysis using Minitab Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 18
S Evaluating the possibilities of using qmswrapper or greenlightguru Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 4
P Is it possible to make an educated decision using a very very small sample size? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3
V Using K-Factor(Tolerance Interval) Analysis for Design Verification Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 3

Similar threads

Top Bottom