SBS - The best value in QMS software

Using K-Factor(Tolerance Interval) Analysis for Design Verification

V

vbhatta

#1
Hi,
I am working on a Design Verification project for a customer where the acceptance criteria used for a diameter feature is K-Factor Analysis at 90%/90% Confidence/Reliability (C/R). The idea is that at stated C/R values, once you compute your Tolerance Intervals, they should be within your specification limits (Upper-one sided limit in our case)

Out of 30 datapoint collected recently, 1 point is outside specification. However, the K-factor (or Tolerance Interval) is still within specification limit (as the process average is well within the USL and std. Deviation is very small).

Our team is suggesting that we can chose to ignore the fact that one point was outside specification since the K-factor is still within specification limits! Doesn't this violate the very first requirement to perform any statistical analysis, that is, the data has to be "in control" prior to analysis?

Has anyone else run into this situation? If so, how did you handle this predicament?

Thanks in advance for your help!
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Bev D

Heretical Statistician
Staff member
Super Moderator
#2
can you describe what the 'k-factor' analysis is? I think I know, but I've been surprised by Customer requirements before. It might also be helpful for you to post your data if you can.

The requirement for statistical analysis is not that the data (or process) be in control. but rather that the choice statistical analysis matches the data's true state of distribution.

If you are referring to the traditional process capability study, then yes the process needs to be in a state of statistical control prior to assessing capability; however one point outside of the spec limits is not an indication of instability. again helpful to see your data
 
V

vbhatta

#3
Hello Bev,

Thanks for a quick response!

K-factor analysis is used in our facility in lieu of a plain +/- 3-sigma tolerance interval. Here are a couple of good primer on Tolerance Interval-

7.2.6.3. Tolerance intervals for a normal distribution
Statistical Tolerance Intervals | Quality Digest


The idea is that, instead of computing average and std. dev. and then using +/- 3 Std. Deviations to figure out your process spread, the K-factor (or K-multiplier) depends on your sample size. Higher the sample size, lower the K-multiplier is. For the same sample size, the K-factor is different for a one-sided Vs. a two-sided specification limit.

For this analysis, once we have computed Average and Std. Deviation from collected data, we have to figure out what K-factor to use. To get this K-factor value, we have to know what Confidence/Reliability (C/R) value we need to use (which in turn is derived based on the Severity/Occurrence values one has on their FMEA- most companies have such a matrix prepared in their site) and we also need to know the sample size. Then it's just a matter of going to this table and looking for a K-factor value corresponding to the C/R value and sample size. Once K-factor is know, you simply multiply it by the standard deviation and then use it for your "Average +/- K x Sigma" equation to compute the process spread and compare it to your specification limit to ensure that this computed Tolerance Interval is smaller than your specification limit.
 

Attachments

Last edited by a moderator:

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Staff member
Moderator
#4
@vbhatta Thanks for highlighting Dr. Wheeler's article on Tolerance Intervals. I find it extremely enlightening and apparently useful for me.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
T 4 Factor Optimization using Minitab Using Minitab Software 7
C Design of Experiments or Factor analysis using existing data Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 7
B Struggling with using the 5.6 version Ford Capacity Analysis Report APQP and PPAP 0
cnbrosa Study Type 1 on a CMM using a measuring support Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 4
R MRB (Material Review Board) Process using MS Sharepoint or MS Teams Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
K 510k FDA review, will they accept Biocompatibility result generated using feasibility product lots? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 8
B AS9100D 7.1.5.2 Calibration or Verification Method using outside cal lab AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
U Medical Device CE Marking - Using a disposable bearing CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 3
D Calibration tolerance question using Pipettes Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 1
D Risk Analysis using Monte Carlo Simulation instead of Scoring and Heat Map Risk Management Principles and Generic Guidelines 2
W Using tailoring guidelines to tailor a QMS procedure ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
Y We found out we have been using a equipment without validation for past 4 years Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 6
D Using Laboratory Notebooks in R&D and Design and Development ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
C Importer shell game - Using a third party logistics provider (3PL) in the EU EU Medical Device Regulations 5
S Work performed in Canada on US patients using US device Canada Medical Device Regulations 1
S Is using ANSI/ASQ Z1.4-2008 the correct sampling plan to determine Pass/Fail of Apparel measurements? AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 4
A What are the pros and cons of using an audit software for internal auditing? General Auditing Discussions 7
Tagin Evaluating nonconformances for escalation using Bayesian methods? Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 2
D Using non-conforming components even though the final assembly is conforming? Manufacturing and Related Processes 5
B Using Unreleased Documents & Process Maps for Internal Audit purposes ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
R Clause 7.7 Replicate, Recalibration and Intermediate checks using Artifact ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
Stoic Are any medical device companies using the 2011 FDA process validation guidance instead of GHTF/SG3/N99-10:2004? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
B Unit of Use DI (Device Identifier) - Products using the same device US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 0
A Using Arduino based sensors for Poke-Yoke Manufacturing and Related Processes 6
M Using your Manufacturer's ISO certification ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
Ed Panek Adverse Event Clinical Trial using a 510K approved Device Other US Medical Device Regulations 6
B Using non CE parts in a machine CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 1
G Gauge R&R on multiple dimensions using 3D measurement system Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 6
A Hospital IT expectations for connected medical device using WIFI Medical Information Technology, Medical Software and Health Informatics 0
Proud Liberal Cp / Cpk on position using multiple MMC bonuses Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 2
B Using external FDA and ISO 13485 audit as internal audit Internal Auditing 6
D Using "Particle Size Standard" templates as gauges - How to avoid giving a gauge # while using for process control? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
J Class 1 Medical Device - Using a UPC over the UDI? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 0
I Reducing CE marking cost using manufacturer test reports CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 5
CPhelan Using clinical trial safety data for evidence for CE marking EU Medical Device Regulations 7
M Accredited Calibration Sevice Provider using computerized system to issue calibration certificate Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 3
M Accredited Calibration Sevice Provider using computerized system to issue calibration certificate General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
M Raw stock material testing discrepancy using an XRF (x-ray fluorescence) analyzer Manufacturing and Related Processes 7
Z Using FMEA for Knowledge Management FMEA and Control Plans 6
Sidney Vianna NASA to Develop a Novel Approach for All-Electric Aircraft Using Cryogenic Liquid Hydrogen as Energy Storage World News 2
S How many of you are using Robotic process automation for calibration lab management? ISO 17025 related Discussions 0
J Including Repeats in DoE using Minitab Using Minitab Software 5
S Legal Manufacturer FDA Reporting Obligations for Using New Contract Sterilization Site Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
John Predmore What size pinhole can be reliably detected using visual inspection? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 7
D I'm new in IMDS special using the IMDS application Manufacturing and Related Processes 8
John Broomfield Workplace by Facebook - Any other organizations using this collaborative tool? Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 0
I Flatness - Rectangular part using the three jack method Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 10
JoshuaFroud How important is using the "correct" GMDN? Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 13
A Overkill? Using the 3L5W tool on non-conformities Nonconformance and Corrective Action 3
M GD&T tolerance or band? Using a symbol like parallelism // Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 8

Similar threads

Top Bottom