Using Risk Management in ISO 10993 - Medical Device Accessory

T

tabcoil_1

#1
I've asked our quality manager at my company if we can perform a risk analysis in support of NOT performing biocompatibility testing on an accessory for a class 2 medical device. I was told that the 10993 standard only includes examples that conclude testing is required and based on his past experiences the auditor will always ask for full biocompatible test results. So our QM is very reluctant to use any other means to satisfy biocompatibility other than testing. So we've never been allowed to use RM to justify not testing. Reading the standard, this appears possible and I'm sure many companies have been able to successfully do this.

Any tips on how you were able to do this? What information did you dig up to support not testing? I would think that an accessory, made from polycarbonate, that the patient will never be able to touch, should be something that can be justified? Or am I wrong?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Marcelo

Inactive Registered Visitor
#2
You can use the standard (not only RM) to support not doing testing. In fact, the objective of the standards is to reduce testing.

You need to apply the full 10993-1 process, including, for example, the material characterization, risk analysis and evaluation, and literature search (and also the steps in the flowchart, between other requirements). If the biological risk is considered acceptable (if the qualified person - the toxicologist, conclude so) due to the data already in existence, you don't need to perform testing.

It's not so simple as it sounds, but it's obviously feasible. Then again, you can also conclude that the data is not enough to consider then risk acceptable, and then some testing may be needed.
 

yodon

Staff member
Super Moderator
#3
This may be where theory and practice don't exactly mesh.

My somewhat limited experience is that a Technical File reviewer drops down to the biocompatibility part of the essential requirement checklist and if he or she doesn't see biocompatibility data from an accredited test lab, boom, you're done. Given their current backlog, this isn't too surprising. Assuming they take the time to review the rationale to not test, they still might not conclude that the claims are sufficiently supported.

I, for one, would be curious to hear of anyone's experience with going the non-test route.
 
T

tabcoil_1

#4
reviewer drops down to the biocompatibility part of the essential requirement checklist and if he or she doesn't see biocompatibility data from an accredited test lab, boom, you're done
This is the feeling I'm getting from our QM. It's just not worth the hassle in trying to justify it (it may take longer to gather the required information than actually having someone else do the testing)
 

Ronen E

Problem Solver
Staff member
Moderator
#5
This is the feeling I'm getting from our QM. It's just not worth the hassle in trying to justify it (it may take longer to gather the required information than actually having someone else do the testing)
It boils down to a benefit/cost analysis. In some cases the tests involved are very expensive (>US$50,000 per test) and long (>6 months) and thus manufacturers (especially small start-up companies) have a clear incentive to exhaust all other options before taking the test route.

Your case might be different, of course.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
J Using JobBoss for Risk Management AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 1
D Risk Analysis using Monte Carlo Simulation instead of Scoring and Heat Map Risk Management Principles and Generic Guidelines 2
K Risk Assessment / FMEA - Using the same Risk Opportunities - Opinion Question AS9100, IAQG, NADCAP and Aerospace related Standards and Requirements 9
T Using FMEA to determine Risk in minimising Testing FMEA and Control Plans 6
V Risk Assessment using the BITS Calculator IEC 27001 - Information Security Management Systems (ISMS) 4
T Internal Audit Plan using Oracle GRC (Governance Risk and Compliance) modules Internal Auditing 4
M Risk Analysis using FMEA Process Flow Chart - Health Care Information System FMEA and Control Plans 6
Ajit Basrur Risk Analysis using Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) or Hazard Operations Analysis (HAZOP) ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
S ISO13485 from a risk analysis point of view using 14971 as a guide ISO 14971 - Medical Device Risk Management 5
Q Using Risk Communication Strategies to leverage Audit Reporting Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 11
W Using tailoring guidelines to tailor a QMS procedure ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 2
Y We found out we have been using a equipment without validation for past 4 years Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 6
D Using Laboratory Notebooks in R&D and Design and Development ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
C Importer shell game - Using a third party logistics provider (3PL) in the EU EU Medical Device Regulations 5
S Work performed in Canada on US patients using US device Canada Medical Device Regulations 1
S Is using ANSI/ASQ Z1.4-2008 the correct sampling plan to determine Pass/Fail of Apparel measurements? AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 4
A What are the pros and cons of using an audit software for internal auditing? General Auditing Discussions 7
Tagin Evaluating nonconformances for escalation using Bayesian methods? Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 2
D Using non-conforming components even though the final assembly is conforming? Manufacturing and Related Processes 5
B Using Unreleased Documents & Process Maps for Internal Audit purposes ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 12
R Clause 7.7 Replicate, Recalibration and Intermediate checks using Artifact ISO 17025 related Discussions 1
Stoic Are any medical device companies using the 2011 FDA process validation guidance instead of GHTF/SG3/N99-10:2004? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
B Unit of Use DI (Device Identifier) - Products using the same device US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 0
A Using Arduino based sensors for Poke-Yoke Manufacturing and Related Processes 6
M Using your Manufacturer's ISO certification ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 5
Ed Panek Adverse Event Clinical Trial using a 510K approved Device Other US Medical Device Regulations 6
B Using non CE parts in a machine CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 1
G Gauge R&R on multiple dimensions using 3D measurement system Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 6
A Hospital IT expectations for connected medical device using WIFI Medical Information Technology, Medical Software and Health Informatics 0
Proud Liberal Cp / Cpk on position using multiple MMC bonuses Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 2
B Using external FDA and ISO 13485 audit as internal audit Internal Auditing 6
D Using "Particle Size Standard" templates as gauges - How to avoid giving a gauge # while using for process control? General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
J Class 1 Medical Device - Using a UPC over the UDI? 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 0
I Reducing CE marking cost using manufacturer test reports CE Marking (Conformité Européene) / CB Scheme 5
CPhelan Using clinical trial safety data for evidence for CE marking EU Medical Device Regulations 7
M Accredited Calibration Sevice Provider using computerized system to issue calibration certificate Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 3
M Accredited Calibration Sevice Provider using computerized system to issue calibration certificate General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 2
M Raw stock material testing discrepancy using an XRF (x-ray fluorescence) analyzer Manufacturing and Related Processes 7
Z Using FMEA for Knowledge Management FMEA and Control Plans 6
Sidney Vianna NASA to Develop a Novel Approach for All-Electric Aircraft Using Cryogenic Liquid Hydrogen as Energy Storage World News 2
S How many of you are using Robotic process automation for calibration lab management? ISO 17025 related Discussions 0
J Including Repeats in DoE using Minitab Using Minitab Software 5
S Legal Manufacturer FDA Reporting Obligations for Using New Contract Sterilization Site Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 0
John Predmore What size pinhole can be reliably detected using visual inspection? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 7
D I'm new in IMDS special using the IMDS application Manufacturing and Related Processes 8
John Broomfield Workplace by Facebook - Any other organizations using this collaborative tool? Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 0
I Flatness - Rectangular part using the three jack method Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 10
JoshuaFroud How important is using the "correct" GMDN? Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 13
A Overkill? Using the 3L5W tool on non-conformities Nonconformance and Corrective Action 3
M GD&T tolerance or band? Using a symbol like parallelism // Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 8

Similar threads

Top Bottom