Hi all,
Just wanting to survey the professional crowd if your organizations utilize RPN (S x O x D) value for Nonconformances this way:
1) To quantity initial risk (characterized by a Cause --> Failure Mode --> Effect).
2) Then develop mitigation actions that address the SOD values, and
3) Then project the new RPN value (assuming the actions have been taken).
Purpose for this is to confirm if the proposed actions will reduce risk to the acceptable level (designated threshold).
This is not part of an
FMEA project, but supposedly to integrate quality risk management into the NC process. But this risk assessment is solely being used to confirm that proposed risk mitigation actions would sufficiently reduce risk to an acceptable level. I haven't come across RPN being used this way, and eager to hear what others have to share.
Thanks