Variation between Faro Arms

DWPOZE

Registered Visitor
#1
We have 4 Faro Arms and I want to see how variation there is between them. I had 4 inspectors measure 1 part on all 4 faro arms. How is the best way to determine how much variation there is between each faro arm?
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

John Predmore

Quite Involved in Discussions
#2
I want to see how [much] variation
The best way to "see" variation is a from graph. In Excel, I would sort the dimensions from nominal-low-to-nominal-high, list the nominals in column A, stack measurements 4 columns wide, 4 stacks of columns high. I would put inspector 1 on machine 1 in column B1, insp 1 on mach 2 in column C1, 1 on 3 in D1, 1 on 4 in E1, then below this matrix, skip a space and put insp 2 on mach 1 in col B, etc. left to right. This 4 up arrangement will produce 4 vertical panels of line graphs, each inspector in its own panel, each panel showing the spread of the 4 machines. What you would like to see is 4 lines in each panel tightly-spaced, ideally all on top of one another. Any spread of the lines indicates variation in measurements. The reason for plotting in this fashion is you are able to see if one machine or one dimension or one operator is more variable than the rest, or if there is some systemic bias, perhaps the bias is greater on larger nominal dimensions or the farther the dimension are from the x,y,z origin. I would also look at the alternative arrangement of 4 stacks of 4 columns, with each machine in a separate panel. This arrangement would highlight different results among inspectors.
 

Welshwizard

Starting to get Involved
#3
Any statistical method of data analysis must filter out the noise from the excessive variation therefore the first step is to start right at the beginning and think about how you are going to design the study to reveal what you want.

For example, if you have anymore than one operator carrying out the studies on four arms you will not effectively be able to tell with any degree of certainty whether the differences you may see can be attributed to the kit or the operator or anything else.

If you want to flush out bias you will need an artefact or part of some sort with known values. This artefact will need to be stable during the studies or once again you will encounter differences that you may not be able to explain.

As you have not mentioned carrying out the studies with the intent on understanding the magnitude and type of variation you will encounter when measuring your parts in reality we needn't worry about making them representative, however, the environment may need to be monitored during the study in case some of the results reveal influences which you will need to explain.

You will need to securely clamp the artefact and the candidate arm and devise a program to measure it. Ideally, the key steps in this program would be documented such as the arm manufacturer , the software and revision, the clamping method, type of probe, calibration results, number of probings per feature, datuming method etc etc. The operator will need to be aware of the method to avoid the rehearsal effect during the study.

The feature of interest will need to be measured multiple times by each arm for at least 20 individual measurements. The measurements of the feature should be plotted in time series on an individual moving range (ImR) chart. If any measurements breach the upper or lower control limits calculated on this chart then the measurement process is not consistent and the measurement procedure should be examined and if necessary corrected (this is the part where the noise is being filtered)

Finally, you should arrive at four ImR charts which should contain consistent measurements. The average range on the moving range charts essentially is a major component of the standard deviation which describes the repeatability so you can compare this across the four arms. The X bar average on the Individual Chart defines the location of the data and if there is a known size on the artefact you can compare this for bias.

From this point, if you want to properly compare the characteristics taking into consideration the noise I suggests you look at the quality digest, (www.qualitydigest.com) articles "When are instruments equivalent?" Part 1 May, 2019 and Part 2 June, 2019 from Dr Donald J Wheeler and James Beagle III. These articles contain simple formulas and example calculations to compute all you need.

Notice how none of what I have said compares the outcomes against tolerance, you can of course do this but only when you know that the differences you see are not noise.

Hope this helps.
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
J What is the difference between Process Variation and Tolerance? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 4
B Components of Variation not within or between Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 4
H What is the difference between Process Variation and Product Tolerance for GR&R? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 5
A Difference between Common Cause Variation and Special Cause of Variation Six Sigma 7
K Analysis variation among the lots during cpk calculation. Design and Development of Products and Processes 1
N Post registration variation to medical device Other Medical Device Regulations World-Wide 1
Q % Study variation low, % tolerance high - GR&R Interpretation help Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3
D Do I need part variation while doing Destructive Variable Gage R&R MSA study Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 19
E Changes to medical device submitted through a variation? EU Medical Device Regulations 1
T GRR based on part tolerance or process variation. Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 7
B Gage R&R Acceptable (10-30%), deduct Total Variation from Tolerance Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 12
D "It depends on the Auditor" Is excessive variation jeopardizing system certification? Registrars and Notified Bodies 40
Q What does % study variation of 20% mean in GRR? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 17
V Query on PA66+GF15% - Color variation (Natural to Yellowish) problem Manufacturing and Related Processes 20
Mikey324 GR&R - Little to no part to part variation in single part number Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 14
K Measurement system analysis "shall be conducted to analyze the variation..." Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3
E Measurement System Analysis (With parts that have variation) Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 1
S Variation Study on Mined Material - What do you call it (not a control chart) Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 7
P Total Variation in Data - Overall Importance of the Principal Components Reliability Analysis - Predictions, Testing and Standards 1
GURU SDI Measurement Variation in a Coating Thickness Meter Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 4
M How to Measure Paper considering Variation and Humidity General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 10
J Nested Gage RR Accounting for Process Variation Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 1
B Gage R&R MSA - Variation, Tolerance, Variance by different methods IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 23
J Calculating part variation from historic data for GRR study Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 1
I Gage R&R confusion on a part that has little variation Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 6
M How do I measure variation in my process ? Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 3
B Reducing variation through multiple readings Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 6
C AS9103 Variation Management Example Procedure AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 1
J Reducing Variation via Multiple Readings Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 5
V Drift and Variation over Time of an Analytical Balance. Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 2
T Variation in values of the levels in Factorial/Response surface design Using Minitab Software 1
B Process Control - Selecting Parts - NDC & Study Variation Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 1
J Weighing Balance Accuracy for Plastic Moulded Parts variation study Manufacturing and Related Processes 3
A How to understand the source of variability and "stream-to-stream variation" Six Sigma 8
I The concept of Surrogate Process Variation in MSAs Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 4
Bev D Probability question - Components of Variation study on a single use diagnostic test Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 1
X Poor GR&R results due to Low Part Variation Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 20
C Design of Experiments to Reduce Variation in a Lathe Operation Quality Assurance and Compliance Software Tools and Solutions 9
M 30% Max Study Variation Criterion - Where Cited? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 6
D Reducing Within Part Variation during a Gage R&R Study Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 26
H "Too little" variation in gage R&R Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 2
C Multiple Variation Gage R&R for Automated Testers Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3
L DOE (Design of Experiments) - Analyse Variation with Minitab Using Minitab Software 5
S Gage R&R - Percent of Tolerance or Percent of Variation? Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3
J Variation (using ANOVA method) Required for Gage R&R Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3
G Crossed and Nested MSA - Determining Components of Variation Using Minitab Software 6
2 DOE to minimize Noise Contributions that enlarge the Variation beyond Part-Part Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 5
G Dealing with Excessive Within-Part Variation when doing MSA and Cpk studies Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 3
M Tolerance vs. Study Variation - Choosing the right one Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 5
S Ppk & Cpk - Within Subgroup Variation is always smaller than Total Variation Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 18
Similar threads


















































Top Bottom