Very interesting article concerning MSA (Measurement System Analysis)

B

Black arrow

#1
Hi there,

When i read this article by Q-DAS director Dr. Ing. Edgar Dietrich i really changed my mind when it becomes to selecting reference figures and how they affects the result in the end.Interseting what Q-DAS director recommend and what arguments he has for that choice. This can be read from "Reference Figures affecting the result" and forward.

http://www.q-das.de/en/current/piq-journal-32010/msa-4th-edition/
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor
B

Black arrow

#2
Hi again,

I would be glad if someone comments the article. I agree with him that selecting parts is critical and i think in the end he preferres tolerance as to be compared to. Seems to be resonable. Tolerance is constant, easier to compare measuring equipment with measuring equipment, easier to compare new ones with old,....
What do you say about this?

But i do not know what he mean and disagree with him what he wrote under "Part variation".

" The proposed and preferred part variation is a resasonable reference figure, for sure. However, in order to use this figure, the taken parts must be evenly spread within tolerance and some parts have to lie outside tolerance limits"

This way is not correct way according to manual reference MSA 4 th ed (AIAG) or?
 

Miner

Forum Moderator
Staff member
Admin
#3
I disagree with him on two points. The section on Parts Variation is dead wrong. You should never hand select parts in such a manner. Secondly, you do need to compare measurement variation to the actual process variation. A gage may be suitable for inspection, but be totally useless for SPC because it cannot "see" the part variation.
 

WCHorn

Rubber, Too Glamorous?
Trusted Information Resource
#4
The section regarding part variation makes more sense if applied to attribute gage studies. For those studies, you need product spread throughout the tolerance and even outside the tolerance to make sure the gage can detect good from bad.

If the gage is a variable gage used only for inspection, then comparing the R&R to the tolerance is fine. The location of the samples within the tolerance is not important.

If the gage is a variable gage used for statistical process control, then I agree with Miner. You must know how the gage performs versus product variation.
 
B

Black arrow

#5
For sure, It is important to select parts that are representing the process variation. However I find i it quite difficult to select parts in practice and we have lately been using standard deviation from earlier made cap.study. Is this correct approach according to AIAG guidelines?
 

Miner

Forum Moderator
Staff member
Admin
#6
Yes. You may use the standard deviation or the Cp index from a prior capability study. This is specifically mentioned in the 4th edition manual.

I strongly recommend using the former approach specifically because it is difficult to find 10 representative samples.
 
B

Black arrow

#7
Ok so if i understand you correct, using % Process option in Minitab do not conflict to MSA reference manual.

Thanks!
 

Bev D

Heretical Statistician
Staff member
Super Moderator
#9
i would also be leery of this article simply because it's written by someone at the company that wants to sell your their software.

my recommendation is to stick with independent sources such as donald wheeler...
 
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
S Validation Records - Very young QMS Qualification and Validation (including 21 CFR Part 11) 2
M Informational EU – Candidate List of substances of very high concern for Authorisation Medical Device and FDA Regulations and Standards News 0
M Inputs on definition of very similar processes for multi site audit sample - IAF MD1 2018 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
L What is the very first step to prepare for applying EASA POA? EASA and JAA Aviation Standards and Requirements 1
Sidney Vianna ISO seems not to be aware that ILO is not very happy with ISO's work on OHS Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 5
J Question on very low NDC number with tolerable GRR ratio's Capability, Accuracy and Stability - Processes, Machines, etc. 7
Rincewind Clinical Evaluation of very low risk medical devices EU Medical Device Regulations 3
P Is it possible to make an educated decision using a very very small sample size? Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3
Y Change Management in a very complex Research Organization Misc. Quality Assurance and Business Systems Related Topics 3
Randy Very proud grandfather (Randy Dec 2016) Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 7
R Working on a 510(k) that is very similar to the predicate device Other US Medical Device Regulations 4
A Can we do audit in "VERY CONFIDENTIAL DEPARTMENTS"? Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 9
S How will ISO 9001 help the machinists in a very small Machine Shop ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 23
P Very cheap Hardness Blocks unfortunately without Traceability General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 11
R Determining the feasibility/scope for FDA IQ/OQ against a very simple application US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2
M Document Change Control for a Very Small Business Document Control Systems, Procedures, Forms and Templates 12
V Inference of bad predicted-R-Sq - But very good R-Sq and Adj-R-Sq. Using Minitab Software 2
R IMDS time frame submission for a very old product APQP and PPAP 1
B How to Demonstrate Stability and Repeatability in very Short Run Process AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 10
D Single-Point Scale Calibration - Very Large Scales General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 3
H Digging Up Bones - Inspector Retrieving Very Old Inspection Data Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 3
C Very Small OTC (Over The Counter) Pharmaceutical Company Requirements US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 6
Stijloor American airports don't rank very well. Travel - Hotels, Motels, Planes and Trains 13
T Mercury is covered under RoHS but is not a substance of very high concern (SVHC) ? RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 2
T Very effective movie about clean-up - Tool for 5S Training Lean in Manufacturing and Service Industries 4
Z IEC 60601-1-2 for very simple Medical Device Accessory IEC 60601 - Medical Electrical Equipment Safety Standards Series 4
J EDMS for Very Early Drug Development (Research/Drug Discovery) Pharmaceuticals (21 CFR Part 210, 21 CFR Part 211 and related Regulations) 4
G Very Basic PFMEA (Process FMEA) Guidelines FMEA and Control Plans 17
N What to do about very old MSDS Sheets Occupational Health & Safety Management Standards 24
Q Very Minimal Processes in ISO 9001:2008 ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 6
Stijloor Video clips in VIMEO do not run very well. After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 12
Stijloor Thank you very much!! Covegratulations 5
N Nonconforming Material (NCM) Control in very Small Manufacturing Companies ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 3
R Research involving a very small population (100 approx) - Help with Sampling Statistical Analysis Tools, Techniques and SPC 3
T Risk Management in a very small low tech, Class 1 Medical Device Manufacturer ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 3
C Device 'A' has no applicable Standard, but a very similar product 'B' does Other Medical Device Related Standards 6
Ron Rompen Very Unique Prototype Requirement - Cutting Holes in Tubing Manufacturing and Related Processes 2
smryan SVHC (Substances of Very High Concern) Declaration List Update Notices RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 3
N Dehumidified (Dry) Cleanroom - Running a Cleanroom at very low RH Manufacturing and Related Processes 23
Q What's wrong with my data? MSA result showed very high % R&R Gage R&R (GR&R) and MSA (Measurement Systems Analysis) 4
J Very Funny!! Funny Stuff - Jokes and Humour 1
G VERY easy savory baked Thanks Giving party treat Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 0
N Calculating Sample Size for very low AQL AQL - Acceptable Quality Level 13
Howard Atkins A very Happy Diwali - November 2010 Covegratulations 10
R ASQ CQE Practice Exam - Do I need to score very well to pass? Professional Certifications and Degrees 17
K Very small batch validation ISO 11137 (VDmax25) ISO 13485:2016 - Medical Device Quality Management Systems 6
D Need to get design checklist in place very quickly - as advised by auditor ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 9
B Can Minitab 15 Chart Geometric Distributions with Very Low Defect Rates? Using Minitab Software 2
M Requirements management for a very small medical SW company Quality Tools, Improvement and Analysis 8
B Newbie, easy to follow guide for organizing/assembling very first PPAP booklet APQP and PPAP 3
Similar threads


















































Top Bottom