Week 2 Discussion - What is Quality?

Status
Not open for further replies.
R

Roberta

#11
I agree quality is striving for customer satisfaction of the product, with the added influence that quality is relative to what the customer draws from the market. For example, when digital cameras first came out they were bulky and I am sure the picture quality was nothing compared to what you can get today. Why do we need more megapixels? Because we are all wanting to print poster-size photos? No, because the market is driving the product to have more megapixels and making the customer believe they need a most number of megapixels to have the best quality camera.
 
Elsmar Forum Sponsor

Steve Prevette

Deming Disciple
Staff member
Super Moderator
#12
Roberta said:
For example, when digital cameras first came out they were bulky and I am sure the picture quality was nothing compared to what you can get today.
Funny you should mention digital cameras. I recently heard the story from an ex-Polaroid employee that an engineer at Polaroid suggested the idea of digital photography in 1982. Management snuffed out the idea. Now, you may ask, where is Polaroid today? Simply meeting existing customer expectations for instant picture cameras was not sufficent.
 

amjadrana

Involved - Posts
#13
The definition of quality and grade has mostly been interlinked. Quality has been defined in the standard ISO 9000-2000 as

Degree to which a set of inherent characteristics fulfils requirements.

ISO 9000-2000 (3.1.1)


This is a good and precise definition.

Grade has been defined as:

Category or rank given to different quality requirements for products, processes or systems having the same functional use.
A high grade entity (e.g.a luxurious hotel) can be of unsatisfactory quality and vice versa.
ISO 9000-2000 (3.1.3)

Fitness for use and other definitions offer only one aspect of the whole spectrum. Why re-invent the wheel. Enough time has been given to this topic.
 

Steve Prevette

Deming Disciple
Staff member
Super Moderator
#14
amjadrana said:
Fitness for use and other definitions offer only one aspect of the whole spectrum. Why re-invent the wheel. Enough time has been given to this topic.
Please note this is a student discussion area. I am asking the students to discover some of this past information for themselves, though always appreciative of any outside of the class participation.
 
M

Mary Davenport

#15
Steve Prevette said:
True, there is no "Clear" or "True" definitions for quality. As you consider this question though, what does quality mean to you personally in your purchasing decisions? And can that be extended to a business definition?
Well from a purchasing perspective quality takes on a whole new meaning and increases the number of sign-offs I need on a requisition by 3 people. This only means that our quality/environmental/health people must ensure that various quality considerations are included in the statement of work and that we have completely informed the vendor of our expectations for the services they will provide.
 
R

rtstewart1

#16
Quality....

For my :2cents: , Quality is whatever the customers think it is. In essence, Quality has become a perception. The most precisely designed and accurately manufactured product that has not met the customer's expectations will fall below their level of perceived quality.
 
J

Jamie Morris

#17
Steve Prevette said:
True, there is no "Clear" or "True" definitions for quality. As you consider this question though, what does quality mean to you personally in your purchasing decisions? And can that be extended to a business definition?
From a business prospective, quality has to be institutionlized in every segment of the business process. From inputs (suppliers, raw materials, component parts, etc.) through the transformation process (producing the product, assembling the components parts to make the whole) to the output (final product). Additionally, all the supporting functions that go into taking the product from raw material to distribution (marketing, engineering, sales, etc.) have to ensure the quality of their forecasts, designs, distribution channels, and projections, etc. The final measure of quality is did the product meet and/or exceed the customers' expectations. I believe that if Dr. Demings system (14 points) is applied for each part/function of the system (an organization is a system with component parts or functions), then the organization can achieve a high level of quality in addition to continual improvement and growth. The true measure will be if the P is maximized in this equation: R - C = $P. This is afterall the bottom line.
 

Steve Prevette

Deming Disciple
Staff member
Super Moderator
#18
Jamie Morris said:
The true measure will be if the P is maximized in this equation: R - C = $P. This is afterall the bottom line.
Very good ideas in your post. Integration of quality into production. Perhaps we don't need a "separate" definition for quality . . . treat the whole as a system.
 
D

dwall

#19
ralphsulser said:
Well yes, but: Fit for use of intended function, at a reasonable cost.
Superior quality can be attained, and you expect superior at a high cost.
Why pay for a Rolls Royce if you only need, and want the attributes of a Chevrolet Impala. You can expect good quality and relaibility at a more reasonable cost. Value for your dollar. Isn't this why we shop for the best deal?
I agree...quality should be fit for use of its intended function...as defined by the customer. We could build a high quality product but if it does not meet the customers needs, cost, or time frame I don't think it is considered quality in the customer's eyes. Several years ago. I attended a TQM seminar where we were told that there were 3 words used when discussing a quality product: good, cheap, and fast. But...we could only have two of the three. If we wanted good and fast, it would not be cheap. If we wanted fast and cheap, it would not be good. If we wanted good and cheap, it would not be fast. In our process of continual improvement, I think that we may be able to gain all three by reaching a balance between them. But the ultimate arbitraitor is always the customer.
 
G

Garry

#20
Quality

I would like to challenge the term "Quality Management". Think less of "Quality" and more of Business Process Management. Every process (input - Process - output) is a business process that requires to e managed. Quality is part of the output. The standards world should eliminate the word Quality and replace it completely with Business Management.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Thread starter Similar threads Forum Replies Date
D Scope of Facility - Our auditor asked us last week for our "Scope of the Facility" AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 12
Q Audit 1 week away and no agenda from auditor yet IATF 16949 - Automotive Quality Systems Standard 12
Marc A Four Day Work Week - Reuters - Dec 2018 After Work and Weekend Discussion Topics 7
S Design changes a week after regulatory submission 21 CFR Part 820 - US FDA Quality System Regulations (QSR) 1
B Interview Presentation for Quality Engineer Role Next Week! Career and Occupation Discussions 21
E Irritation test - Dermal Filler - 52-week implantation study EU Medical Device Regulations 0
Marc Adventures in Design Quality Assurance - Two-week-old Pixel 2 XL displays World News 0
W DCMA and AS9100C - Dedicating a week and 5 auditors to perform a AS9100C audit AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 7
B Anyone Attending OTC next week in Houston? (Offshore Technology Confernce) Oil and Gas Industry Standards and Regulations 0
Hershal This week in the High Desert Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 14
R Two Week Notice Backlash Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 17
Mikishots What a week - 15 November 2013 Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 5
Claes Gefvenberg IMS (Integrated Management System) Audited for a week... Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 10
B The Case for a 25-Hour Work Week Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 4
Q Last work week due to immigration process, I'm feeling overwhelmed. Immigration and Expatriate Topics 7
P Suggestions for Europe in a Week - By Car Travel - Hotels, Motels, Planes and Trains 4
chris1price The final version of the RoHS2 recast was published last week as 2011/65/EU RoHS, REACH, ELV, IMDS and Restricted Substances 8
S World Quality Week - PRI Articles AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 0
T It is Audit Week... August 2010 General Auditing Discussions 31
BradM NCSLI this upcoming week! Who will be there? July 2010 General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 11
somashekar Information sharing: Week 27, 2010 (HEAT TREATMENT) The Reading Room 3
somashekar Information sharing: Week 24, 2010 (INDUCTION MOTOR) The Reading Room 0
somashekar Information sharing: Week 22, 2010 (HARDNESS, THREADS, BEARINGS) The Reading Room 3
somashekar Information sharing: Week 22, 2010 (TPM, OEE) The Reading Room 1
somashekar Information sharing: Week 21, 2010 (PAPER SIZES) The Reading Room 1
somashekar Information sharing: Week 21, 2010 (COMPUTER TERMS, NUMBER SYSTEM AND DIGITAL) The Reading Room 0
somashekar Information sharing: Week 21, 2010 (CAPACITORS, TRANSFORMERS, RELAYS) The Reading Room 2
somashekar Information sharing: Week 21, 2010 (LEADACID BATTERY AND 12V ELECTRICAL SYSTEM) The Reading Room 0
somashekar Information sharing: Week 21, 2010 (MOTORS, MACHINES AND LUBRICATION) The Reading Room 0
somashekar Definition Is today (21 May, 2010) in week # 20 or 21 ? Definitions, Acronyms, Abbreviations and Interpretations Listed Alphabetically 1
somashekar Information sharing: Week 20, 2010 (DG set and SYNCHRONIZATION) The Reading Room 0
somashekar Information sharing: Week 19, 2010 (ELECTRICITY, SAFETY & GROUNDING) The Reading Room 0
somashekar Information sharing: Week 19, 2010 (SOLAR ENERGY) The Reading Room 0
somashekar Information sharing: Week 19, 2010 (ENERGY) The Reading Room 0
xcanals_tecno-med.es MDD 93/42 as amended by dir 2007/47 in force next week (21 mars) EU Medical Device Regulations 2
H Elsmar Quote of the Week Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 5
N Ideas for Quality Week Quality Manager and Management Related Issues 18
Claes Gefvenberg Picture of the week Imported Legacy Blogs 1
Claes Gefvenberg Picture of the week Imported Legacy Blogs 0
T How many hours a week do you devote to maintaining your QMS? ISO 9000, ISO 9001, and ISO 9004 Quality Management Systems Standards 15
Claes Gefvenberg Another week, another picture... Imported Legacy Blogs 2
Hershal NCSLI this upcoming week! Who will be there?-2009 General Measurement Device and Calibration Topics 8
J FAA Training suggestions wanted for Sept 1st week Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Standards and Requirements 5
S Wish me luck - whole week Nadcap audit... AS9100, IAQG 9100, Nadcap and related Aerospace Standards and Requirements 10
bobdoering GM prepares to announce Pontiac closure next week Coffee Break and Water Cooler Discussions 1
M Sampling Method for 25 pieces a week of a cable with connectors Inspection, Prints (Drawings), Testing, Sampling and Related Topics 2
Howard Atkins What calender week is it? ISO 8601 is not clear Other ISO and International Standards and European Regulations 4
B Audit Week Is Finally Here Imported Legacy Blogs 2
C Continuous Improvement Toons wanted for Continuous Improvement Awareness Week Preventive Action and Continuous Improvement 2
H I have an interview with LRQA next week - Your advice or experiences? Career and Occupation Discussions 8
Similar threads


















































Top Bottom